okay, so anyone have the answers for my question for Fire Emblem: Three Houses? 👀
Sorry what was the question
okay, so anyone have the answers for my question for Fire Emblem: Three Houses? 👀
Only one side has Hilda, aka best girl.okay, so anyone have the answers for my question for Fire Emblem: Three Houses? 👀
Which question?okay, so anyone have the answers for my question for Fire Emblem: Three Houses? 👀
okay, so anyone have the answers for my question for Fire Emblem: Three Houses? 👀
I have been tempting to open my Fire Emblem Awakening copy so once I'm done with FE:A so I might consider to pick up Three Houses in the future considering people said that it was one of best Fire Emblem in decades or so which got my attention.
But I'm not sure if I want to play all three playthrough (which is like 200 hours according to few members) so which side had best and canon plot as much as it could have.?
You have spent the entirety of Fighters Pass speculation jumping on people for having character desires that don't line up with greater representation. You have inserted yourself into conversations just to bring up the point of representation at any point that you can.I did later acknowledge that it's probably a case of "the absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence". But even then, you can understand why I'd feel pessimistic after this Fighters Pass being all primarily guys.
You've been explain by a woman why this is a problem and all you can muster is condescension.Yeah this is fascinating. I don't know if Byleth broke you guys or if it's just Smash Bros. discourse in general that did it.
Thank you for the first paragraph.I don't think the male default is a non-issue because the male default is a thing. Like, not a Smash Bros thing or a video game thing. There are numerous languages where that's how things are structured - even in Japanese which doesn't have grammatical gender like Spanish or French, a boy is "few years" while a young girl is "few girl". So it doesn't strike me as particularly unfair or pedantic to say that Smash Bros is contributing when it has an overwhelmingly male character select screen and buries the women as options, then says that's good enough.
However, I don't think it's necessarily for lack of effort on the part of Smash Bros that this happens, as this can also come from the pool that Smash Bros is drawing from. The whole concept of of Smash Bros is about pulling from source material, so if the source material is falling on the male default instead of flipping a coin, then that's likely going to be reflected in Smash as well.
The lack of representation is a problem. Saying Sakurai is a secret sexist because he clearly did not ask for a Dragon Quest alt is insane.You've been explain by a woman why this is a problem and all you can muster is condescension.
You have spent the entirety of Fighters Pass speculation jumping on people for having character desires that don't line up with greater representation. You have inserted yourself into conversations just to bring up the point of representation at any point that you can.
I honestly, for the life of me, cannot remember a single conversation you've engaged in on Smash discussion in the past year where your contribution wasn't wasn't just a post on representation that didn't sound like it had been copy/pasted from earlier discussions.
It's one thing to strive for greater representation, and I respect that. But you have frequently been disrespectful toward the desires of others for not matching up with yours. You have been on this for so long, and so frequently, that when someone in a thread asks "What do you want to see in Smash?", you don't even elaborate. You just say, "You know what I'm going to say," and leave it at that.
Like, I'm not going to tell you to give it a rest, because representation is important, but you've apparently forgotten what it means to hold a conversation.
The lack of representation is a problem. Saying Sakurai is a secret sexist because he clearly did not ask for a Dragon Quest alt is insane.
Ignoring women isn't sexist?The lack of representation is a problem. Saying Sakurai is a secret sexist because he clearly did not ask for a Dragon Quest alt is insane.
Holy crap Smash discussion is poison
Not once did I say that Sakurai was sexist, I've even said elsewhere that said conclusion was going too far. There's a difference between negligence & malice. It's still bad, but not as bad.The lack of representation is a problem. Saying Sakurai is a secret sexist because he clearly did not ask for a Dragon Quest alt is insane.
I kind you Imran.Yeah this is fascinating. I don't know if Byleth broke you guys or if it's just Smash Bros. discourse in general that did it.
You've been explain by a woman why this is a problem and all you can muster is condescension.
Keep telling women how they should feel.
Well there's four routes, with 3 characters. I'd say choose Edleguard (the red team girl) and thenWhich route in 3H gives the most interesting gameplay scenarios, for someone who doesn't care at all about the story or characters.
Mostly because of how of 5 1st party characters that have been dlc 3 are from Fire Emblem with the last one being the one to finish a Fighter Pass that only had 3rd party charactersYeah this is fascinating. I don't know if Byleth broke you guys or if it's just Smash Bros. discourse in general that did it.
Ehh, I guess we will never find out unless we're lucky.
I have been tempting to open my Fire Emblem Awakening copy so once I'm done with FE:A so I might consider to pick up Three Houses in the future considering people said that it was one of best Fire Emblem in decades or so which got my attention.
But I'm not sure if I want to play all three playthrough (which is like 200 hours according to few members) so which side had best and canon plot as much as it could have.?
Sakurai's just picking main characters as they're usually the face and most popular character of a game or series. Issue is that most protagonists are dudes which is why Male representation is so large. When people want to pick favorite characters, the pool of male characters is way larger than female which is why most lists have mostly dudes.
He's being aggressive.Cool, lets force another member of the industry out of Era because they aren't "good enough."
And people wonder why this place has the reputation it does.
And calling Sakurai sexist isn't?
How is that aggressive?
Cool, lets force another member of the industry out of Era because they aren't "good enough."
And people wonder why this place has the reputation it does.
Cool, lets force another member of the industry out of Era because they aren't "good enough."
And people wonder why this place has the reputation it does.
That's honestly going too far. There's disagreement & it should be discussed, but we shouldn't jump to the point of forcing people out.I wholeheartedly agree. As such, please leave, so it may improve.
And that's when I know to cut a conversation off.
That's honestly going too far. There's disagreement & it should be discussed, but we shouldn't jump to the point of forcing people out.
No one has called him sexist
I don't know that I've really seen Neoxon berate people in that way, but I also rarely participate in these forum threads.
...No one said that, not one person.
Now THIS is a great example of losing the plot.
I suggested the ignoring women would be sexist. Which, by definition, it would be. But apparently this parasocial relationship with an auteur takes precedence.
Not once did I say that Sakurai was sexist, I've even said elsewhere that said conclusion was going too far. There's a difference between negligence & malice. It's still bad, but not as bad.
Isn't sexism more malice than negligence? I'm honestly asking here.I suggested the ignoring women would be sexist. Which, by definition, it would be.
Which I did admit was a mistake on my part.Well, you did implied that he was when you found out that Jill Valentine was a bottom tier spirit out of all Resident Evil spirits event.
Well, you did implied that he was when you found out that Jill Valentine was a bottom tier spirit out of all Resident Evil spirits event.
Isn't sexism more malice than negligence? I'm honestly asking here.
Which I did admit was a mistake on my part.
Discrimination can be either or both.Isn't sexism more malice than negligence? I'm honestly asking here.
Which I did admit was a mistake on my part.
Thank you for the first paragraph.
But I disagree with the second. There are plenty of options for standalone female characters, and they are not obligated to reflect the source material to the extent that the male gender option must be the default.
I don't think the male default is a non-issue because the male default is a thing. Like, not a Smash Bros thing or a video game thing. There are numerous languages where that's how things are structured - even in Japanese which doesn't have grammatical gender like Spanish or French, a boy is "few years" while a young girl is "few girl". So it doesn't strike me as particularly unfair or pedantic to say that Smash Bros is contributing when it has an overwhelmingly male character select screen and buries the women as options, then says that's good enough.
However, I don't think it's necessarily for lack of effort on the part of Smash Bros that this happens, as this can also come from the pool that Smash Bros is drawing from. The whole concept of of Smash Bros is about pulling from source material, so if the source material is falling on the male default instead of flipping a coin, then that's likely going to be reflected in Smash as well.
With regarding to representation. DLC is a special issue, I think, in that it has to sell by itself. Other additions to the series are subsidized by the rest of the game, so to speak: people weren't buying Brawl for ROB, but if you buy Brawl for the Subspace Emissary, you get ROB.
DLC doesn't have that option. It has to justify its cost all by its lonesome, not as part of the whole. That pushes DLC towards safer choices that you feel assured will sell; something that lines up with the market, something that you'd previously received data on, things like that.
With the video game market having been a boy's space for so long and the hardcore market in particular gearing towards that, it tends to push towards towards male characters. I've heard that the toy market is similar, where things are very gendered and it takes series force to make change. Hasbro doesn't want to make toys for girl Transformers because boys won't buy toys of girl Transformers, which means that there are fewer toys of girl Transformers to normalize boys into playing with them. It becomes a cycle.
I'm posting this descriptively rather than prescriptively, mind you. As a guy whose preference is for historical and lesser known Nintendo series, a lot of the female representation lines up with the sort of thing that I'm looking for because they fall into different places than we see with DLC: I'm talking about Alex Roivas, Ayumi Tachibana, Lip, whoever the main character of Style Savvy is, Rhythm Girl, Freyja, Mach Rider as dictated by that one ending and so on.
But these sort of characters are a risk, which is why you probably won't see a ton of them in DLC. It starts to demand intentional effort to force the situation. An example that comes to mind is how the writer of Digimon Tamers deliberately made the girl into the coolest character in the series in order to strongarm the market into buying her toys.
None of them has the "most canon" path. Subsequent runs can be considerably shorter if you want them to be.
Blue Lions (Azure Moon; Dimitri) tells a more personal story involving tragedy, trauma, and coping. It contains the least background lore and answers the fewest questions.
Black Eagles (Crimson Flower; Edelgard) tells the most distinct story, involving revolution. It's largely a counterpart to Blue Lions. Answers slightly more questions, but not many. Shortest route. Fewest cinematics.
Golden Deer (Verdant Wind; Claude) far and away reveals the most lore and answers the most questions, so in that way might be the most satisfying for an only route, but still has gaps.
Thanks for detailed information (and everyone involved who gave me the answers.) I really appreciate that much!
is 200 hours for all play though accurate? That's why it's kinda off-putting even it have three different sides of the plot which is pretty cool.
Keep in mind that there's a 4th story path tied to the Black Eagles, which adds to the total play-time.Thanks for detailed information (and everyone involved who gave me the answers.) I really appreciate that much!
is 200 hours for all play though accurate? That's why it's kinda off-putting even it have three different sides of the plot which is pretty cool.
Well, you did implied that he was when you found out that Jill Valentine was a bottom tier spirit out of all Resident Evil spirits event.