I literally just finished typing in there. I hate that sort of photographer harassment. Dude was just chilling taking pics. Now if he was selling the stuff on the side to perverts or something then that's a problem, but until that gets unsurfaced he wasn't really doing anything wrong.
That thread is so long that I couldn't even find your post. It's just a thread full of armchair lawyers.
I honestly need to stop posting in there. General public only allows you to photograph three things: Buildings, birds and trees. They all just seem like a bunch of non creative bores.
Get the 135 regardless. That thread is a shit show.
Imagine thinking ERA would have anything but whataboutisms about that thread.
I would never sell mine, but if I didn't already have mine I would seriously consider the 20mm and put the rest towards the 135mm 1.8
I'm waiting for the "I'll beat the ass of anybody that takes my picture" response. Cops really can't say anything to me for taking your picture, but they can do something about you assaulting me.
I have to admit engagements are getting very strange here. The old place is scary as shit and FM is just boring. And I never really got into reddit.
Or the S1R since they share the same mount, sensor and almost the same specs if I'm not mistaken.
They are similar cameras yeah but the EVF on the SL2 is the best on the market.
I didn't even know it didn't get the same 5.7m dot EVF that the S1R did. How is it better?
Ah never mind, you're right they do have the same EVF.
It's a good thing... From a certain point of view.
This is why I don't system switch, I just add shit on...and go broke.
They don't even need a high MP camera either, 26 MP is very good. Obviously higher MP would be great for even bigger prints and/or cropping closer, but it introduces noise as well. If they can hit 30 MP with one stop noise reduction, that'll be hell of a sensor. File size is an issue as well, even 50 MB files are hard/slow to process, take up space, sometimes you start hitting impracticality.
Do you actually feel limited by the dynamic range of your D750? According to DxOMark the Sony A7 III has 0.2EV greater dynamic range than the D750. No camera will capture "Accurate colours". If you use the JPEGs what you see is the camera manufacturer's interpretation of what accurate colours are. If you actually shoot raw, you are the one who gets to make the decision on colour accuracy by editing the image. I'd stick with Nikon for better lens compatibility, maybe you don't even need to jump to mirrorless, as the D850 could be a viable upgrade path.
I'm on Sony, Nikon and Fuji, your friend can't edit the Sony raws. They come in a bit bland, but once you know what you're doing and what you want to do they're fine to edit. I've shot countless events on my A7RII and A7RIII, same with Fuji, same with Nikon and my photo editor and jobs design team has no problem and probably has no idea which file came off of which camera. We're currently doing an ad campaign shot off my RIII.
AR308029 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
AR307566 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
AR307331 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
AR307234 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
AR303636 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
AR304030 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
AR308906 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
AR309142 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
AR306338 by Marcus Beasley, on FlickrSony isn't a "Jpeg" system, but for me neither is Fuji.
I have my eye on the d850, will probably rent it for the air show this memorial day weekend honestly.
Only if you don't have common sense. I've shifted to two different brands and have even gotten back into shooting Nikon. What lenses do you have?
Well I guess a better question for you is, why shoot across three brands. Besides the love of photography, do you find certain brand lenses achieve certian looks better. I was taught by this girl, who basically interned under this destination wedding photographer in Okinawa. I've always noticed she would use her Fuji for only particular shots but her Canon for her usual spread through out the night. Always insisted on doing the ring shots with the Fuji. Whenever I asked why she would just be like "just the way I do it plus I feel bad that I neglect it most of the night"I'm on Sony, Nikon and Fuji, your friend can't edit the Sony raws. They come in a bit bland, but once you know what you're doing and what you want to do they're fine to edit. I've shot countless events on my A7RII and A7RIII, same with Fuji, same with Nikon and my photo editor and jobs design team has no problem and probably has no idea which file came off of which camera. We're currently doing an ad campaign shot off my RIII.
A7RIII:
I went crazy here:
Sony isn't a "Jpeg" system, but for me neither is Fuji.
The usual suspects
Variety. Nikon's starting to turn into my park camera because of the 200-500 though. My Nikon ecosystem has to play a little bit of catch up though because it's missing an exotic portrait prime which I'm looking to get a 105 1.4 for. Sometimes just to achieve a certain look on the Fuji side because I use their film sims in post to enhance my edits. Also I think I bounce around a bit so nothing feels super routine and I can still have fun with it. Gives everything a different feeling.
Yeah all of that looks about right, I'd be find with all of that minus the 50, I just have no love for that focal length. I'm either a 35 guy or something longer like a 135 for example. I almost got a 150-600, but settled on the 200-500, Nikon picks some very odd focal lengths.
That sounds interesting, as long as they don't mandate that you only shoot Canon.
If I have to get a Canon I'll get a Canon. I always wondered what it would be like to have a white lens anyway
I have two on Sony, they stick out I guess, you eventually just unsee it. Canon just feels like a bit of a lateral move to me.,
