• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

jett

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,657
Well recently, he tweeted "Great Day" after the announcement of the departure of an openly gay congressman.
Well that's awful, and not surprising from that guy. I'm sure soon enough he'll do something that cause the ire of his peers.

You have zero idea of what you're talking about. Stop whitewashing a literal fascist in Bolsanaro and the shit he has done and continue to do.
I'm not looking to excuse or defend Bolsonaro, but just saying so far as president he doesn't seem to have taken actions that would be condemned by another head of state. Which nobody has. Which is what Iloelemen asked.
 

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
What? I don't have tons of time to spend on arguing with people who cannot see why this move backed by fucking Trump and Bolsanaro is such a disastrous one. I even posted the open letter above to illustrate the many pitfalls of why this is fucking bad.

2 to 5 minutes is tonnes of time? This'd be less of a problem if you could back up your arguments with the slightest depth, and you have done research for this thread to bolster your arguments before.

You posted a letter condemning a coup, not an article showing proof a coup is occurring. That's flimsy evidence for your argument. Now I'm thinking about it I don't recall you condemning Maduro at all during this thread, and you wonder why people don't find you credible. Funny how atrocities by dictators on the left are perfectly ok, but any time the US does it it's bad. Yet while we condemn the actions the US does, you refuse to with Maduro.

lol fuck Trudeau. The fact that people are using him as an excuse to whitewash this imperalist move tells you all you need to know about his willingness to collaborate with fascists. As many progressive voices have shown, Trudeau is neoliberal through and through - even going as far as congratulating Bolsanaro for his win. Meanwhile, Canadian mining companies are eager to have further ventures in South America that exploit the local populations for their resources, something that I'm sure Trudeau would happily welcome.

If you want an idea about Canada's role in imperialism, listen to this podcast episode by Citations Needed: https://soundcloud.com/citationsnee...shing-whats-behind-canadas-progressive-veneer

"For decades, Canada has been a go-to point of reference for American progressives as a country the United States can and should strive to be. And while there are many parts about Canadian society that are measurably preferable, leftists in Canada find their country's glossy, socialist paradise image to be overblown and often a barrier to meaningful change.

This episode examines this tension, the reality versus perception, what we can learn from each other, and the common and existential thread we share of white settler-colonialism."

You'll get no argument from me about Canada's bad history. However, what about everything else Canada does and is? For a progressive you don't seem to like acknowledging the good progressive policies Trudeau or Canada has made as a country, sounds more like a conservative framing to me. Making everything black and white is easier to shape how others view situations to better shift them to attack political enemies. Curiouser and curiouser, huh, comrade.

I'm not following you here at all. If you want to know what the "Russians did", there's tons of threads to go through on this site that illustrate the hysteria by liberals when it comes to election meddling. Suddenly all of them are quite absent when their own country does the same thing - if not explicitly backing this imperialist move by the US.

I know what Russians did, I'm asking if you do. Since this is another deflection, and a disturbing undermining of the severity of what Russia did I'm going to assume you're fine with it. For someone who insists they're against imperialism and meddling this stance is mighty hypocritical, given what Madura and Putin have done to their own countries. Or is it only bad when the West does it? Repeating "imperialist" is not evidence, but repeating words is a technique conservatives exploit to hammer into followers to go in a specific direction. Trump does this regularly with his rallies, and so do Libertarians like Ayn Rand with her books like Atlas Shrugged.

For a "centre-left", he sure has a lot of conservative/Republican talking points. If it walks a duck, talks like a duck...and the search button above can just be used if you are so inclined to find Stinkles' approval of US (soft) imperialism. Otherwise, feel free to go through the thread or just notice all the hostility towards those of us who are critical about US imperialism (which somehow many people are not!)

This is a snipe hunt. Even if I wanted to what you're feeding me is vague insinuations, not a convincing argument that they are what you say are. They both have more credibility in this discussion than you do by operating in good faith. This is your argument, link me to the posts and I'll analyse them. But we both know you won't.

If everyone agrees it needs reforming now, how about doing that right fucking now when US imperialism is staring right in your face?

You're deliberately ignoring how big a task that is and how many people have done that which have died in the process for to get justice. Where is the call for this justice with Maduro and his government? Who are committing the same vile acts on their people. Police brutality, poverty and starvation are a tool for many regimes, including Venezuela's.

The topic of this thread isn't just Madura's regime, but the coup d'etat that the US is instigating and provoking with the new fascist internationale of Trump and Bolsanaro. Here, right now, is the opportunity for the US and liberals and conservatives to say no to US imperialism, yet all we have is a whole lot of people who think it's their business to decide who should be the leader of another country and not the people in that country themselves.

But it is about Madura's regime, which you don't seem that interested in discussing. There has been no evidence of a coup, and if there were nobody in this thread would support it which has been made extremely clear. Lots of apologia for Maduro, however. We have been, you've ignored us for a false narrative to undermine those who disagree with you. The people of Venezuela have spoken and their legit ruler is not Maduro, so why don't you accept their sovereignty? Your argument is that they should fix this on their own, right?
 

FerDS

Member
Oct 27, 2017
317
Caracas
The majority of the world and the majority of Venezuela sees Nicolás Maduro as the president of the country and that will not change until new elections. This coup has already failed.


Sorry? Do you even understand how governments work? How legitimacy works? Maduro is president.
I have been consistent. I criticize PSUV policy, criticize US meddling (also economic) but want change from within the country through dialogue. You can only beat me by, again, reducing my argumentation to an easy to combat caricature. But like I said, whatever this is not happening because this is an opportunistic attempt by the opposition and the US after they could not grab hold of the military.
The majority of Venezuela absolutely does not see Maduro as president. As for the rest of the world, as far as I know most countries are simply not taking explicit sides; in terms of numbers more have officially recognize Guaidó than Maduro.
 

RocknRola

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,229
Portugal
Can't say I'm too heartbroken about a user that constantly ignored any counter-argument (or, you know, the reality of situation in Venezuela to begin with) and spat out the same propagand drivel over and over, being banned...
 
OP
OP
Iloelemen

Iloelemen

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,323
The majority of Venezuela absolutely does not see Maduro as president. As for the rest of the world, as far as I know most countries are simply not taking explicit sides; in terms of numbers more have officially recognize Guaidó than Maduro.

I think this needs to be emphasized.
Sadly, there's a bunch of lefties who get their Venezuela news from Telesur and as a result, think that Maduro's re-election was 100% fair, that people-led opposition protests don't exist and that the protests that do exist and are happening are actually from pro-Maduro people.
It's very disorienting.
 

Bitmap Frogs

Banned
Sep 16, 2018
705
I think this needs to be emphasized.
Sadly, there's a bunch of lefties who get their Venezuela news from Telesur and as a result, think that Maduro's re-election was 100% fair, that people-led opposition protests don't exist and that the protests that do exist and are happening are actually from pro-Maduro people.
It's very disorienting.

I believe that the real problem is that a majority of people talking about this don't give a shit about Venezuelan people and are only invested in it as a proxy battle for the reputation of socialism.
 

mephixto

Member
Oct 25, 2017
306
I believe that the real problem is that a majority of people talking about this don't give a shit about Venezuelan people and are only invested in it as a proxy battle for the reputation of socialism.

This. I live in Peru and seen thounsands of venezulan working on the streets, asking for help, they give away their currency like souvenir (cause basically is worthless) if you help them or buy something from them. I nerver seen a situation like this in my country.

Maduro is dictator he is basically a clear example of late stage socialism. This guy disolved the congress to instate one with only allies, put on jail their oponents, took away people properties and business.

Sometimes I can't belive some people of this forum trying to defend Maduro or his regime just cause he seem socialist or left.
 

Deleted member 1589

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,576
I believe that the real problem is that a majority of people talking about this don't give a shit about Venezuelan people and are only invested in it as a proxy battle for the reputation of socialism.
Pretty much. It's how they sweep aside what Maduro has done and the clusterfuck in Venezuela for the last decade that was highly infuriating.
 

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/08/world/americas/donald-trump-venezuela-military-coup.html What fucking theories, people eagerly await for USA to go over Venezuela and fuck them completely over with their freedom huh

While America has done coups before, particularly in Latin America, right now there is no evidence a coup is occurring as we speak. If it was I'd denounce it, regardless.

edit: The article is about discussing plans for a coup, and while I agree it is chilling that is not the same as the action committing that to reality. When it becomes real then you'll have the evidence to be angry at the US for doing something against Venezuela.
 

The Omega Man

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,916
Are these first world leftist / communist wannabe that call this a coup aware of what Maduro did to secure his win last election? (illegally moving the date up, barring parties and people from running in the election at will among other things)
 

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
Are these first world leftist / communist wannabe that call this a coup aware of what Maduro did to secure his win last election? (illegally moving the date up, barring parties and people from running in the election at will among other things)

My concern is not that they don't know it's that they simply are apathetic about what's happening to the Venezuelan people to score points against capitalism. Defending Maduro to hurt the libs, as it were.
 
Last edited:

The Omega Man

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,916
USA should directly intervene in Rusia as well then.

I fail to see how my post advocates for an intervention

My concern is not that they don't know it's that they simply are apathetic about what's happening to the Venezuelan people to score points against capitalism. Defending Maduro to hurt he libs, as it were.

I feel like I am taking crazy pills here, if like despite posts from real Venezuelans, despite all the facts against Maduro's catastrophic regime, they just parrot the same words over over over: bu bu bu but capitalism!, illegal coup!, Bolsonaro! Trump, Canada! it's like they want to score a moral victory regardles of the real victims here the Venezuelan people.
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2017
7,510
Were some actually defending Maduro?
The man's heinous as all hell. I'm just contentious with USA because...well, history with this sort of thing has been utter shit.
I hear "regime change" and think you're going to fuck this up like many times before.
 

LeonLeon

Banned
Aug 7, 2018
53
Chile
As venezuelan, im disgusted not only you dare to tell us how our country is or whats happening there. But mocking of our disgrace and suffering when not a single day have gone you without a meal, let alone eating once per day if you are lucky.

You have no fucking idea what despair and hopelessness feels like.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
Were some actually defending Maduro?
The man's heinous as all hell. I'm just contentious with USA because...well, history with this sort of thing has been utter shit.
I hear "regime change" and think you're going to fuck this up like many times before.
Yes.

Claiming the past set of elections were legitimate/free is to be backing Maduro without explicitly saying so.
Claiming Guiado is "right wing" (he's not) is an effort to demonize him and implicitly support Maduro because they're portraying him as the "left" option without explicitly saying the latter part.
Claiming the US is to blame for Venezuela's economic collapse is to be backing Maduro when his admin is constantly blaming the US with conspiracy theories and sanctions are very, very recent relative to the complete collapse of the economy and hyperinflation which occured far before that (and is what triggered the sanctions, along with the end of democratic elections.)

Maduro is to socialism as Kim-Jong Un is to socialism (as in, not at all actually interested in it, they're really just a horrible dictator) but the Chavez/Maduro propaganda campaign that's been going on the past two decades through various channels has an faction online chomping at the bit to defend this crap in the name of "TRUE SOCIALISM" with them portraying it as a continuation of the cold war.

The Last Week Tonight video on Venezuela is a pretty good overview, as is the comic posted earlier in the thread.
 

House_Of_Lightning

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
5,048
As just seen on reddit:

"The PSUV taking ownership of oil refineries and passing profits down to the workers is socialist."

'So oil barons and trickle down economics are socialism now?'


murderedbywords.txt
 

ExpandedKang

Member
Oct 30, 2017
350
Maduro and his his government is inept, corrupt, and failing his citizens. The sooner it's done the better. Regardless of our views, however, this criticism is not coming from a good place with the US republicans, they are only concerned about their ideological war, they couldn't give two shits about the people there. This is the same party that basically left their own people in Puerto Rico to die, they let ill Americans perish every day and they sure as shit don't care about the democratic process given how they've gerrymandered and suppressed their way into power on so many occasions. These are hollow, weasel words. They will look for a solution in Venezuela that benefits them, whether that be domestically or in terms of sway within Venezuela, the humanitarian outcome is entirely irrelevant, as we've seen they have no issues with despots and mass murderers, so long as they are ideologically aligned.

People should absolutely be cynical and worried when he singles out a particular leader like that. People should be similarly worried about what kind of damage he can do with this kind of rhetoric, because words mean different things depending on who they come from and the power they wield. When the president of the US talks it doesn't just carry significant clout, but also historical baggage which in turn carries with it an implicit threat. If this plays into Maduro's paranoia about the US wanting to overthrow him (not an unreasonable fear I might add) then this could cause more violence and a doubling down on suppressing opposition. Issues like these are more nuanced, Maduro can be illegitimate and it's entirely possible Trump can be right in his assessment, yet isn't actually right in saying it. Furthermore, talk of "legitimacy" and similar language is the kind we've heard as a precursor to devastating, destructive intervention so many times in the past. People have a right to be fucking wary at this point.
 

eonden

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,084
As just seen on reddit:

"The PSUV taking ownership of oil refineries and passing profits down to the workers is socialist."

'So oil barons and trickle down economics are socialism now?'


murderedbywords.txt
Issue is that instead of proper socialism, where they give control to the workers and people with knowledge, they gave it to people whose main knowledge was being friends with the president and had no regulations. So they turned corrupt.

Edit: as tends to happen in this kind of states.
 

Funky Papa

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,694
Spanish Foreign Minister just said that the EU is debating the recognition of Guiado if Maduro doesn't call an election after a certain date.
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459
BTW Vela was the one who brought up Russia (which he also infers isn't a thing that even really happened) by trawling other threads for "evidence" of poster's hypocrisy and we still didnt have him cite a single example from anyone in this thread saying "I hope America interferes" and he still hasn't properly addressed the fact that Maduro killed people and committed massive election fraud.
 

Dog of Bork

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,989
Texas
BTW Vela was the one who brought up Russia (which he also infers isn't a thing that even really happened) by trawling other threads for "evidence" of poster's hypocrisy and we still didnt have him cite a single example from anyone in this thread saying "I hope America interferes" and he still hasn't properly addressed the fact that Maduro killed people and committed massive election fraud.
It's more important to whatabout and shit on America than engage with the actual topic of the thread.
 

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
I feel like I am taking crazy pills here, if like despite posts from real Venezuelans, despite all the facts against Maduro's catastrophic regime, they just parrot the same words over over over: bu bu bu but capitalism!, illegal coup!, Bolsonaro! Trump, Canada! it's like they want to score a moral victory regardles of the real victims here the Venezuelan people.

Agreed.
 

Deleted member 1589

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,576
I'm sure all of us are worried about US actually intervening with Venezuela, and more with the chance that Guaido might actually make things worse.

There's always those chances.

Thing is, both of these are assumptions at best. The very real thing that is happening is that Maduro is making Venezuelans suffer and most of them want a change in government. This is what most of us are supporting them for, to get our of a shithole of a situation.
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,351
Maduro and his his government is inept, corrupt, and failing his citizens. The sooner it's done the better. Regardless of our views, however, this criticism is not coming from a good place with the US republicans, they are only concerned about their ideological war, they couldn't give two shits about the people there. This is the same party that basically left their own people in Puerto Rico to die, they let ill Americans perish every day and they sure as shit don't care about the democratic process given how they've gerrymandered and suppressed their way into power on so many occasions. These are hollow, weasel words. They will look for a solution in Venezuela that benefits them, whether that be domestically or in terms of sway within Venezuela, the humanitarian outcome is entirely irrelevant, as we've seen they have no issues with despots and mass murderers, so long as they are ideologically aligned.

People should absolutely be cynical and worried when he singles out a particular leader like that. People should be similarly worried about what kind of damage he can do with this kind of rhetoric, because words mean different things depending on who they come from and the power they wield. When the president of the US talks it doesn't just carry significant clout, but also historical baggage which in turn carries with it an implicit threat. If this plays into Maduro's paranoia about the US wanting to overthrow him (not an unreasonable fear I might add) then this could cause more violence and a doubling down on suppressing opposition. Issues like these are more nuanced, Maduro can be illegitimate and it's entirely possible Trump can be right in his assessment, yet isn't actually right in saying it. Furthermore, talk of "legitimacy" and similar language is the kind we've heard as a precursor to devastating, destructive intervention so many times in the past. People have a right to be fucking wary at this point.
Thank you. The rhetoric that anyone even remotely skeptical of Trump and Pence on this must be some tankie that "stans" for dictators and tyrants is toxic.
 

Deleted member 1589

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,576
Thank you. The rhetoric that anyone even remotely skeptical of all of this must be some tankie that "stans" for dictators and tyrants is toxic.
If this were the case the thread wouldn't be 22 pages long, trust me.

There were people who were handwaving away how Maduro is failing its citizens while talking about a coup that isn't, or hasn't happened. All this while putting up incredulously dubious links or explanations that were countered with facts of what actually happened.

I know most of them aren't stans for dictators, they aren't stupid. What annoyed me was that they chose to ignore what is happening, what Venezuelans had to say about the situation, and instead talk about American imperialism when that's not even a fraction of what went wrong in Venezuela.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
Thank you. The rhetoric that anyone even remotely skeptical of Trump and Pence on this must be some tankie that "stans" for dictators and tyrants is toxic.
That's not what's going on. Posts like the one you quoted, Bernie's take, they are getting posted and no one really has a problem with them.

There are others denying that Maduro is a dictator, that paint the opposition leader as far right, that blame Venezuela's current issues entirely on conspiracy theories about the US. Those are the ones that are getting hard pushback and also the ones who are very very insistent on pushing their POV to try and drown out actual reality.
 

M.Bluth

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,252
BTW Vela was the one who brought up Russia (which he also infers isn't a thing that even really happened) by trawling other threads for "evidence" of poster's hypocrisy and we still didnt have him cite a single example from anyone in this thread saying "I hope America interferes" and he still hasn't properly addressed the fact that Maduro killed people and committed massive election fraud.
Yup.
I have no issue whatsoever with anyone feeling the US, considering their history, should stay out of it. But posts that stan for Maduro, calling him legitimate, talking about western paternalism while they ignore Venezuelan voices, excusing everything by saying the people of Venezuela prefer to be "materially poorer" but at least not a "puppet state"... That garbage is not acceptable.
 

y2dvd

Member
Nov 14, 2017
2,481
Were some actually defending Maduro?
The man's heinous as all hell. I'm just contentious with USA because...well, history with this sort of thing has been utter shit.
I hear "regime change" and think you're going to fuck this up like many times before.

You can have an opinion of not supporting a coup for all intents and purposes and not support Maduro at the same time. Somehow posters aren't getting this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.