yep.
In 20 years when they realize the conservatives did nothing for them again maybe they'll give the ndp another shot.
Can't own the libs by voting for them though.
yep.
In 20 years when they realize the conservatives did nothing for them again maybe they'll give the ndp another shot.
Ironic considering Suncor, Cenovus, etc. claim to support a price on carbon.Hmm...
Yeah, this pollster definitely doesn't seem like it could be heavily biased.
Ironic considering Suncor, Cenovus, etc. claim to support a price on carbon.
Shell has come out in support as well.
Probably better carbon tax rather than cap and trade.
Plus they can pretend to care about the environment.
SNC-Lavalin whistleblower claiming a different set of bribes being paid, this time using taxpayer money via EDC:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/snc-lavalin-export-development-canada-loans-1.5079922
This was during the Conservatives, but seriously, this company is the gift that keeps on giving.
But it's all about dem JERBS I guess?
Voters are too dumb to see the Conservative bullshit and will vote Conservative anywayIt certainly makes all the Tory bluster about how Liberals are in bed with big business blow back on them, especially because no one can claim false equivalence in calling them out for it when it's the same company that's involved. I imagine that hypocrisy being on full display might be the very reason that the story came out in the first place, but I won't look a gift horse in the mouth.
It's not that they're too dumb (though they are), it's that they don't care.Voters are too dumb to see the Conservative bullshit and will vote Conservative anyway
It's almost as if Conservatives are liars, hypocrites, and backstabbers, who only care about using power to disenfranchise their enemies and punish anyone who doesn't follow their bigotry and greed driven credo.
Voters are too dumb to see the Conservative bullshit and will vote Conservative anyway
You think Greens are conservatives?
I should vote Liberal after this SNC affair?ah yes because pointing out that voting for an irrelevant and unelectable party is helping the consevative is trolling...
Swing voters will happily paint Tories and Liberals with the same corruption brush. If they couldn't do that, they wouldn't be swing voters in the first place, would they? They change teams at the first sight of problems. They don't vote Conservative because they believe in social conservatism, nor do they genuinely believe in progressive causes, they just look for the politician with the highest profile that can pretend to exhibit values counter to whatever problem caused them to flee voting for the government of the age. That lack of understanding of a bigger picture is quite honestly what I find most revolting and infuriating about them. Thankfully, this new wrinkle in the SNC-Lavalin story (which will get a LOT of coverage, due to being related to the biggest news story of the year) and other stories like it in the next 6 months cause these swing voters to re-consider going elsewhere.Voters are too dumb to see the Conservative bullshit and will vote Conservative anyway
Unless you know where they live and whether or not such a vote is a viable alternative that conforms to the lauded ABC voting strategy, feel free to keep the accusations to yourself.
Thanks. The reality is that the conservative support in my riding is so strong right now that they're pretty much unassailable. It was close-ish for awhile but then that SNC thing happened and that Lib chance is now shot to shit. If it gets close again( narrator: it won't) I'll vote Lib.Unless you know where they live and whether or not such a vote is a viable alternative that conforms to the lauded ABC voting strategy, feel free to keep the accusations to yourself.
Unless you know where they live and whether or not such a vote is a viable alternative that conforms to the lauded ABC voting strategy, feel free to keep the accusations to yourself.
oh please the greens are no ''viable alternative'' to the conservative in any ridings
uh, Saanich?if it prevent a conservative win then hell yeah you should
oh please the greens are no ''viable alternative'' to the conservative in any ridings
That's not true. loloh please the greens are no ''viable alternative'' to the conservative in any ridings
In this thread, I learned that the riding of Saanich-Gulf Islands does not exist.
Not entirely. You'll also need to account for PEI, which are set to turn to the Greens provincially in 21 days, which may have a huge impact on federal voting there. And, as mentioned, May's staying power has influenced Green support in surrounding ridings on Vancouver Island.oops forgot about this one
oh please the greens are only a ''viable alternative'' to the conservative in one ridings which happens to have the chief of the party which of course gave it a boost place a random green candidate and the con would most likely win beside you don't live in that riding so this point is moot
there i fixed it
And the Greens are in a coalition provincially here in BC. I would definitely like for them to gain more standing in the province with a good result in the fed election even if it doesn't translate to seats. It could help them with the appearance of "viability" in the future provincially.Not entirely. You'll also need to account for PEI, which are set to turn to the Greens provincially in 21 days, which may have a huge impact on federal voting there. And, as mentioned, May's staying power has influenced Green support in surrounding ridings on Vancouver Island.
To say nothing of the fact that the statement of vote intent was a "maybe" that you interpreted as a "definitely", for no discernible reason.
I've come to accept that most Liberals are Blue rather than Orange. They sup from the same table after all. :pCanada's looking at a Conservative majority.
Conservative acquaintances are very grateful for the kerfuffle and most don't even care about it other than the damage it does.
It's funny that the NDP supporters might have thought they'd get a significant boost from this SNC thing. LOL.
The rise in the PPC isn't so funny though.
Might vote Green next election.
BC is such as jokeThat's not true. lol
I'm from BC and the Greens have a presence here.
Joke of what? They elect a Green MP? Whats wrong with that? Does the world end when they dont elect a Liberal?
Throwing stones all the way from Quebec? That's a beautiful glass house you have there.
Yeah. Don't come out here. It's terrible. The weather sucks too.
2008
Conservative Gary Lunn 27,988 43.43 +6.28
Liberal Briony Penn 25,367 39.36 +13.28
Green Andrew Lewis 6,732 10.45 +0.51
New Democratic Julian West 3,667 5.69 −20.85
2011
Green Elizabeth May 31,890 46.33 +35.88
Conservative Gary Lunn 24,544 35.66 −7.77
New Democratic Edith Loring-Kuhanga 8,185 11.89 +6.20
Liberal Renée Hetherington 4,208 6.11 −33.25
Even this has a huge asterisk on it because a large portion of the NDP's base comes directly from the Youth and Millennial vote. Of which Climate Change is a huge issue for our demographic. In top of several other issues. But it would be disengenoous is the Greens aren't offering some attractive solutions for those other issues as of late.The Greens are not a labour party and environmentalism is pretty orthogonal to everything else so they don't necessarily compete with the NDP base. They make a pretty effective centrist alternative to the Liberals.
They spouting platitudes like "doing the right thing" but keep mumm on details of what is wrong.Dude enough.
If Scheer wins it's on the voters. LPC is hilariously bad at handling this too.
Seriously. All the proof I need that Trudeau fucked up and things are looking bad is just how much Gutter is freaking out over this, trying to set this narrative.Dude enough.
If Scheer wins it's on the voters. LPC is hilariously bad at handling this too.
Even this has a huge asterisk on it because a large portion of the NDP's base comes directly from the Youth and Millennial vote. Of which Climate Change is a huge issue for our demographic. In top of several other issues. But it would be disengenoous is the Greens aren't offering some attractive solutions for those other issues as of late.
lol damn. Remarkable that people think these two have some sort of 4D chess ~agenda~. Nah it's just that they were normal people whose brains hadn't been broken by Ottawa partisan politics.
How come poor and minortized peoples in Canada don't get the same level of mercy when it comes to their own sentencing in courts of law or when dealing with the police?It's the lack of a 4D agenda that's the problem. Not in the made up sense but looking at it as a political war. There's a time and place to fight certain battles and it seemed poorly considered, and almost entirely self regarding, that it risked the loss of allied battles on other fronts.
Discretion is the better part of valour and is part of having integrity.
It is right to want to remove corruption but at what cost? With the type of corruption involved in the SNC thing there were no immediate health and safety risks. The timing and way this battle has been fought has put more people at risk than not.
100% this.
Instead though the government decided to come with a dozen contradictory explanations for its insanely inappropriate behaviour because jobs.
whatabout. a different issue.How come poor and minortized peoples in Canada don't get the same level of mercy when it comes to their own sentencing in courts of law or when dealing with the police?
I mean, thats entirely different. Is it fair, not really. But a poor person going to jail hurts really only that person, maybe their family. A company going down costs lots of people their jobs.How come poor and minortized peoples in Canada don't get the same level of mercy when it comes to their own sentencing in courts of law or when dealing with the police?