I'm not disagreeing with you. I just thought your last post was very reminiscent of Palpatine. I don't think even Trudeau thinks like that.hehehehe
ahhhhh
I lived through Pierre Trudeau, Clark, Mulroney, Chretien, Martin, Harper and now Justin
the ony thing YOU PEOPLE must get through your heads is that this is the norm while operating in Parliament.
This notion that politicians should be pius, righteous and pure is a mythology. Government is about managing a country and making difficult decisions weighed on different factors.
Justin Trudeau weighed on the side of protecting jobs, and I personally think that that is more important than academic, latte sipping righteousness that would cost hard working Canadians thousands of jobs.
sometimes, you must break some eggs to make an omelette and the includes lame ethics. Sometimes, you get to get dirty to get the shit done.
what would you have done in his shoes?
IMO, our PM did the right thing. He's speaking skills sucks, and he says dumb shit but he did the right thing at the end of the day in protecting those jobs.
IMO, our PM did the right thing. He's speaking skills sucks, and he says dumb shit but he did the right thing at the end of the day in protecting those jobs.
I wasn't replying to you actually,I'm not disagreeing with you. I just thought your last post was very reminiscent of Palpatine. I don't think even Trudeau thinks like that.
But it's fine when Liberals had orgasms about Harper shitting the bed? lolI wasn't replying to you actually,
I found your post funny
(I did invoke Palpatine, hehehe)
it's just that the 3rd place Lefty-Left are getting orgasms seeing Trudeau get into trouble and getting annoying about it
it's just that the 3rd place Lefty-Left are getting orgasms seeing Trudeau get into trouble and getting annoying about it
So at what point does it become wrong?
Should we let any crooked corporation get away with murder because of Canadian jobs? What if they just stop paying taxes or break all sorts of labor laws?
Should we do arms deals with Saudi Arabia if it means jobs?
Seems you're teetering close to fascism where the line between government and corporations is almost non-existent.
The problem is whether or not you think Canada should have an independent justice system or if the government should be able to decide who is guilty and who is innocent.Well for SNC Lavalin, the people involved in the Libya scandal are long gone. The company has since tried to do better (supposedly, that's what I gathered). You can't punish the people who are currently there for something that was done by a previous regime. And it is about jobs, I see people saying that who cares about corporations or someone else will take SNC Lavalin's place if they go belly up. But newsflash, there won't be a successor just like Nortel or the Avro Company. And deferred plea agreements are completely fine, many governments use them all the time. In the US, both parties have used them time and time again. Yes, America is pro-corporation but it's not a left/right issue.
The arms deal was under Harper, and it was only recently that Western countries have grown a backbone when dealing with Saudi Arabia, and that's all because of MBS being so reckless.
I just wanted to point those out.
Still, JWR has a book coming up in September so it will be inevitably brought back in the spotlight.
The problem is whether or not you think Canada should have an independent justice system or if the government should be able to decide who is guilty and who is innocent.
So is the Ethics Commissioner A TRAITOR CPC FANBOY WHO WANTS TO DESTROY CANADA FOR REASONS?!?!?! or something?
Just want to see where people stand because Liberals are The Only Choice (tm).
The PMO wasn't trying to decide the guilt or innocence of SNC, they acted on the behalf of the thousands of poor bastards that are slogging it out every day in the trenches just like the rest of us with their decent enough paying jobs. Should the PMO just say fuck all those poor bastards and their families that helped to elect the government for something those workers I'm sure had no say in whatever it was the executive decided to do on their own?
We're seeing a similar situation with the print media companies in Canada as well. Most here think Postmedia should die an evil death, but what of the thousands of poor bastards that have no say in what comes out of the Postmedia ivory tower in Toronto and their continued slide to the right? A good portion of those people have been with the company since the Southam days working in decent enough paying jobs, but fuck them they can get other decent enough paying jobs in print media in Canada? It was another Harper decision that allowed US ownership to come in and takeover the financial ownership of Postmedia, and here we are today. Fuck all those people and their families that have spent a career with the company, which also allows them to spend a career paying taxes, or come up with a $600 million+ contingency fund that will help print media make the transition toward an all digital future.
Is it all right, is it all wrong... I don't fucking know at such a basic level, but I do know that we don't live in such a black and white world. For me I'd say there is at least some merit in the choices made by the PMO, such that there is some value in thinking of those that would feel the real impact if "fuck that company/industry/whatever" were the only answer. Call it the Too Big to Fail Conundrum... bail out the banks, too big to fail... bail out the auto industry, too big to fail... bail out the ship builders in the Maritimes, too big to fail... bail out the logging industry, too big to fail... bail out the farmers, too big to fail... bail out the oil industry, too big to fail... bail out SNC/tech industry, too big to fail. Fuck me Harper even tried to bail out the asbestos industry stooping to the level of attending a BBQ on Canada Day, of all days, that was put on by the CEO of the last remaining asbestos mining company in Quebec.
The point being this is the shit that every PMO has to face/will face with every government... it isn't deciding guilt or innocence, it's putting those that elected them in the first place as their primary concern, and do keep in mind the government knows full well that not everyone in these companies or industries voted for them. Or to put that another way for those that are cynical enough... protecting those that pay taxes first, because the government always gotta get that dolla dolla.
HARPER PLAYING 5D CHESS!!!!!!!!!Harper created the Ethics Commissioner so if you really think about it, this is ALL HARPER'S FAULT!!!
That is 100% fluff.
The PM, the Party comes before the MP.
I have been represented by MPs and MNAs in my lifetime who never really represented me.
LOL fucking Gilles Duceppe surely never reflected or represented me and my beliefs in this riding
Well that's troubling.Cross-posting from the other thread, in response to a comment comparing PM Trudeau to Campaign Mode Trudeau:
He won't be able to get away with it this time on the campaign trail.
Now that people have had a good look at him, he's gonna be heavily scrutinized going forward.
God help us if he makes another monumental campaign promise, but proceeds to break it.
At that point, I wouldn't even blame anyone for defecting to the opposition.
What is then gaping in the report is whether Section 9 is designed to catch conflicts of interest which is designed to further the personal interests not only of the person interests of government officials like the prime minister but given that governments frequently advance the interests of the private, for example through subsidies, tax changes, exemptions in regulations, is it limited only in situation where government can in no way claim it is advancing the public interest. This is especially important area for the commissioner to have examined given that the prime minister and his senior staff have strenuously claimed that he was seeking to influence a remediation agreement for SNC-Lavalin in the public interest of saving 9,000 jobs
You joke but the cretin is not out of the game just yet: Stephen Harper Heads a Global Org That Helps Get Right-Wing Parties Elected
Harper resides in Calgary and is chairman and chief executive officer of Harper & Associates, a global consulting firm. In February 2018, in Madrid, Harper was elected chairman of the IDU. Formerly based in Oslo, the organization is now based in Munich. Harper did not respond to a request for an interview.
The IDU website says Harper had overseen "a dramatic deepening of relations with India." The right-wing, Hindu nationalist ruling BJP party joined the IDU in February 2016. The party saw a significant increase in support in the May 23 election, upping the number of seats in their majority government from 282 to 303. India is the world's largest democracy, and as an IDU member it will be able to promote similar ideology around the world. (Could it be that there was a little more to Trudeau's disastrous trip to India than a fashion faux pas?)
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu's hard-right party, Likud, became the 73rd member of the IDU in 2018. The party's initiation was marked by a ceremony at the Ronald Reagan Library in Simi Valley, California, presided over by Harper.
In July, the IDU congratulated member Nea Demokratia for that conservative party's election win in Greece. Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis immediately vowed to slash taxes and accept austerity measures imposed by the European Union.
As head of the IDU, Stephen Harper also personally congratulated Viktor Orbán, a man Maclean's called "one of the most alarming right-wing populists" in Europe. Harper said that he and the IDU looked forward to working with Orbán, who has been widely criticized for his anti-immigrant policies and co-option of the courts and electoral system in Hungary. The European Union has just taken Hungary to the European Court of Justice at The Hague for passing legislation that makes it a "crime" to assist asylum seekers.
Does this look natural to anyone?
Alright, think it's about time for me to put together the Canada Elections ERA Thread.
I'd wait until September. No one is paying attention during summer.Does this look natural to anyone?
Alright, think it's about time for me to put together the Canada Elections ERA Thread.
I remember when he started the firm. I had no idea it was still going... lolYou joke but the cretin is not out of the game just yet: Stephen Harper Heads a Global Org That Helps Get Right-Wing Parties Elected
The election is about 9 weeks away. I think now is exactly the right time to get that thread started.I'd wait until September. No one is paying attention during summer.
I'd also use the same banner this topic is using.
You could literally just post only the banner, and the point of the thread will have been adequately expressed.The election is about 9 weeks away. I think now is exactly the right time to get that thread started.
Also i'll probably do just that since I can't think of another image for the banner outside of Yvon of the Yukon frozen in ice.
True but the mods would probably lock it so...guess i'll take the piss out of the CPC and tell everyone to vote Rhino.You could literally just post only the banner, and the point of the thread will have been adequately expressed.
Noooo don't do it yet. It'll make me cry :'(
I was so positive a week ago. It's just totally crashed again.
Does this look natural to anyone?
Alright, think it's about time for me to put together the Canada Elections ERA Thread.
Let me put this in perspective for you. Even after the Nigel Wright affair Harper was still polling above all other leaders into 2015 election. What did him in was his dog whistling to the racist wing and his association to the Ford's. The recession didn't help either.
These scandals barely register as a ballot question when it comes to it. Campaigns do matter.
LOL. Watch this unfold the exact opposite of what i just implied...
I think the problem for the conservatives right now is the SNC was covered so breathlessly for weeks back when it first came out that people, and maybe even the media, are burnt out on it.
I think the problem for the conservatives right now is the SNC scandal was covered so breathlessly for weeks back when it first came out that people, and maybe even the media, are burnt out on it.
I'd say it's a perfectly legitimate story for a show like PnP to cover. The question is are they still talking about it a week from now.Fuckin PnP and the whole of the CBC aren't done with it in the slightest. I actually like Vassy but I'm so sick of them harping on this shit over and over and mostly leaving the cons alone. How about you do a news story on their repeated lies instead?
Jody Wilson-Raybould says she didn't know how aggressively SNC-Lavalin lobbied for remediation agreement
Former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould said Thursday she didn't realize just how aggressively SNC-Lavalin had lobbied senior members of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government to create a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) regime, a legal avenue it hoped would help it avoid a criminal trial for alleged corporate wrongdoing.
Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion documented the extensive lobbying efforts — the content of which were largely unknown to the public until now — in his report on Trudeau's ethics violations.
"That was of surprise to me. I did not have knowledge," Wilson-Raybould said, in an interview with CBC News Network's Power & Politics. "There were many conversations that were being had by former colleagues of mine, political staffers, around SNC, meeting with officials of the company and having discussions that I wasn't aware of."
Wilson-Raybould said she knew there were some talks between SNC-Lavalin and the upper echelons of the Liberal government, but she didn't realize that the very idea of establishing a DPA regime came from the company itself.
"I undertook, as I was the minister of Justice, to amend the Criminal Code to bring in the new regime and provide that additional discretionary tool to prosecutors, but the extent of the relationship and engagement and the lobbying of that company — I was not aware of that and, to be honest, I find it curious that there were such detailed discussion that was not brought to my attention," Wilson-Raybould said in an interview with host Vassy Kapelos.
While "curious," Wilson-Raybould said she still believes there is nothing criminal about the actions of the prime minister, or the staff acting under his direction, on this file. Wilson-Raybould said as much during a House of Commons justice committee meeting on the affair in February. "I still stand by that answer that I gave at the committee," she said Thursday.
The B.C. MP said she leaves it in the very "capable hands" of the RCMP to decide whether the prime minister's conduct warrants a criminal investigation. She said the RCMP has not yet contacted her as part of any inquiry.
Trudeau told Dion, before a meeting with SNC-Lavalin executives in 2016, he wasn't familiar with a deferred prosecution regime, a legal avenue that is used in other jurisdictions to deal with corporate wrongdoing.
One of his senior staffers, Mathieu Bouchard, went to work studying how Canada could introduce a remediation agreement regime of its own. The government held a series of public consultations throughout 2017. In January 2018, Finance Minister Bill Morneau met with SNC-Lavalin CEO Neil Bruce on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where the executive pushed the case for a remediation agreement. He asked Morneau that there be a "timely implementation of a regime via the federal budget."
The company then provided Morneau and a staffer, Justin To, with a document that outlined how a remediation agreement regime would "increase the likelihood of a settlement of the company's pending criminal charges, of the company maintaining its head office in Canada for the foreseeable future and of an increase in its workforce."
Three weeks later, after the Davos meeting, the government introduced amendments to the Criminal Code to give federal prosecutors the option of pursuing remediation agreements with companies accused of criminality.
The new regime was billed as a way "to reduce the negative consequences of the wrongdoing for persons — employees, customers, pensioners and others — who did not engage in the wrongdoing, while holding responsible those individuals who did engage in that wrongdoing."
The changes were added to the 2018 Federal Budget Implementation Act.
Dion said, based on interviews with expert witnesses, that non-fiscal items are typically included in a federal budget bill to expedite passage through Parliament.
In an interview with Dion as part of his investigation, Trudeau said SNC-Lavalin was not directly involved in the legislative process.
"According to Mr. Trudeau, SNC-Lavalin was a timely example of a company with a significant number of employees in Canada, that had engaged in alleged wrongdoing under previous management, and that was now trying to reform. A remediation agreement regime offered a way through for SNC-Lavalin, as had been the case for other large engineering firms in Europe which had benefited from this type of regime," Dion said.
In mid-August 2018, Ben Chin, one of Morneau's senior staffers, spoke with Wilson-Raybould's chief of staff, Jessica Prince, telling her that SNC-Lavalin was complaining about negotiations for a remediation agreement taking too long.
He asked if there was anything he could do to move the process along. Prince said the Public Prosecution Service of Canada, the independent body that prosecutes federal offences, was taking the lead on the file and that any request for a "status update" could be perceived as improper political interference.
Former Indigenous Service minister Jane Philpott, who left cabinet citing a lack of confidence in Trudeau's handling of the SNC-Lavalin matter, said she too was surprised to learn the extent of SNC-Lavalin's advocacy for the creation of a remediation agreement regime.
"Many of the things in [Dion's] report I was aware of, but I was not aware of all the things that came out in this week's report," Philpott said. "It was disturbing. It was unsettling to me to realize the extent to which officials took steps to be able to benefit the interests of a private corporation."
On Sept. 4, 2018, Kathleen Roussel, the director of public prosecutions, informed SNC-Lavalin that she believed a remediation agreement would be inappropriate in its case. It's that decision that then prompted Liberal government officials to encourage Wilson-Raybould to overrule Roussel and begin negotiating an agreement with the engineering firm — an option that was made available to her by virtue of the Criminal Code changes SNC-Lavalin lobbied the government to enact.
Dion found Trudeau violated the Conflict of Interest Act by trying to influence Wilson-Raybould and get her to overrule the decision to not grant a DPA.
"The prime minister, directly and through his senior officials, used various means to exert influence over Ms. Wilson-Raybould. The authority of the prime minister and his office was used to circumvent, undermine and ultimately attempt to discredit the decision of the director of public prosecutions as well as the authority of Ms. Wilson‑Raybould as the Crown's chief law officer," Dion said.
Trudeau maintains he simply encouraged Wilson-Raybould to consider an alternative legal solution so as to help SNC-Lavalin avoid the potentially devastating effects of a criminal trial on the firm. A conviction could bar the construction company from future federal contracts.
Trudeau has said he believes he did nothing wrong — he did not direct her to follow his favoured course of action — and an apology is not necessary because he disagrees with the ethics commissioner's conclusion that any sort of communication with the attorney general on the matter was inappropriate.
"I'm not going to apologize for standing up for Canadians' jobs because that's my job — to make sure that Canadians, communities and families across the country are supported, and that's what I will always do," Trudeau said Wednesday during a campaign-style stop in Fredericton.
Dion has said the attorney general should be free from interference, including from her fellow cabinet colleagues, on decisions related to criminal matters. Under federal law, a prosecutor is barred from considering the "national economic interest," when deciding on whether to bring charges.
Trudeau has said cabinet ministers should be able to talk freely, when warranted, about public interest considerations around criminal prosecutions.
No big deal here right, just a corporation getting the government to write legislation specifically designed to bail themselves out of criminal wrongdoing.
That's synonymous with accomplishing nothing in most cases. Especially as an independent.Except, you know, representing her constituents. Her only fault was not bowing to political pressure by the PM.
But in a Westminster parliamentary system in this day and age we mostly elect trainee monkeys who are whipped into obeying the ringleader.
But as someone who has a cabinet member as their MP your vote has a bit more cachet to it. Those of us who get to vote for backbenchers vote for a party, or have uncompetitive ridings and vote for no real reason at all.False. This is what the system has moved toward, but the basis of the system is that we elect local MPs who then determine who will be government. If you notice, there isn't even any mentioned of parties in the constitution. We could have 100% independent MPs and the country would still function the same way.
Obviously many people vote for the PM and don't even know or don't care who their local MP is (people like you), and other people (like me) care about their local MP. I will be voting for Ralph Goodale this fall as my MP, but I'd prefer if Trudeau was not PM. Though I do want a Liberal or NDP government.
I'm a big fan of Vassy but I'm so fucking sick of hearing JWR on her soapbox talking about all these "relevations" (yes, relevations).Fuckin PnP and the whole of the CBC aren't done with it in the slightest. I actually like Vassy but I'm so sick of them harping on this shit over and over and mostly leaving the cons alone. How about you do a news story on their repeated lies instead?
I'm a big fan of Vassy but I'm so fucking sick of hearing JWR on her soapbox talking about all these "relevations" (yes, relevations).