Looks like they're already promoting election fraud, preparing for the loss?
That's the best sign yet, you don't "promote" election fraud if the numbers look good
Looks like they're already promoting election fraud, preparing for the loss?
Capital gains are only taxed upon realization, which is a fancy way to say when you sell an asset. The point of the wealth tax would be to tax assets on an ongoing basis and regardless of whether a profit is being realized on it.
I'd imagine it'd be implemented a lot like a management expense ratio in mutual funds and ETFs, at least insofar as public financial securities go. And similarly to property taxes for real estate. The difficult part seems like it would be valuing private corporations whose shares aren't traded on a public stock exchange.
Art should totally be included too. Also there's no good reason for lottery winnings to be excluded. I'd put it at 0.5% per year on all wealth on everyone with more than 2 million dollars in net worth, but excluding TFSAs, RRSPs and other tax advantaged accounts from that net worth calculation, and the assets inside such accounts wouldn't be subject to wealth tax.
That's the best sign yet, you don't "promote" election fraud if the numbers look good
The Conservatives aren't the ones with the "electoral college" advantage in this election.
The Conservatives aren't the ones with the "electoral college" advantage in this election.
Nothing about conservative messaging in the last week implies they think they're winning at the moment.
The Conservatives aren't the ones with the "electoral college" advantage in this election.
Another clue the Conservatives don't think they're going to win right now is that in the last few days they've started talking up Singh on TV, which to me implies the "NDP is tanking in certain key ridings" thing is real and the CPC need them to be doing way better.
Her being on Putin's shit list was enough for me, but that's good as well.
I'd imagine it'd be implemented a lot like a management expense ratio in mutual funds and ETFs, at least insofar as public financial securities go. And similarly to property taxes for real estate. The difficult part seems like it would be valuing private corporations whose shares aren't traded on a public stock exchange.
Art should totally be included too. Also there's no good reason for lottery winnings to be excluded. I'd put it at 0.5% per year on all wealth on everyone with more than 2 million dollars in net worth, but excluding TFSAs, RRSPs and other tax advantaged accounts from that net worth calculation, and the assets inside such accounts wouldn't be subject to wealth tax.
Everybody has been talking up Singh. LOL. I mean, he was mediocre at best during the debates. But I haven't really seen him elevate his game. And his policy proposals leave much to be desired.
has been talking up Singh. LOL. I mean, he was mediocre at best during the debates
Real estate is always tricky because everyone needs a place to live. We can live without stocks or lottery wins but shelter is essential. Some of these paper millionaires are old and retired with little savings; they could sell and cash out, but then they don't have anywhere to go. You can't force them to sell or downsize.
Singh seems like a good dude but he sort of comes off like he's running for student council.
so Trump is pro-ISIS for being okay with Turkey steamroll over the Kurds
so Trump is pro-ISIS for being okay with Turkey steamroll over the Kurds
I think people here are underestimating how much Singh comes across as more likable than Trudeau and Scheer, especially among young people. His personal brand is quite good right now.
I think people here are underestimating how much Singh comes across as more likable than Trudeau and Scheer, especially among young people. His personal brand is quite good right now.
Singh's popularity soars, but party fails to follow suit: Nanos
TORONTO – Over the course of the campaign, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh's personal popularity has been steadily increasing, but the same can't be said for his party.
That's according to polling data from Nanos Research, commissioned by CTV News and The Globe and Mail, which saw the NDP leader's support surge 10 points from the beginning of September.
Pollster Nik Nanos said Singh's support has grown from 36 per cent on Sept. 13 to 46 per cent on Oct. 8. in a survey asking respondents which party leader possesses the qualities of a good political leader.
"What the research clearly shows is that the one big winner on the brand front has actually been Jagmeet Singh," he told CTV's Trend Line podcast on Wednesday.
....
People have been talking up Singh because... he's been doing really well. In the few weeks of the campaign his popularity has increased 10 points.
At the moment it doesn't look like an Orange Wave is about to sweep the nation, but the upside for the NDP at least is that it seems like Singh has made some gains and positive connections. This probably means that even if as expected there's a substantial regression of NDP fortunes in Quebec, there's not going to be a rush to boot Singh from the leadership role.
Someone at work noted there was a research that came out which showed Trudeau actually fulfilled most promises among Canadian PMs. Anyone know if it's true and point me towards the article? Wouldn't mind sharing with friends and even feel good about voting Liberal as it stand I was only gonna do it to prevent Con winning in my riding...i am still pissed about several of Trudeau's broken promises. Tnx in advance.
Just to be clear, my post was about Conservative pundits, who do not actually like Singh.I think people here are underestimating how much Singh comes across as more likable than Trudeau and Scheer, especially among young people. His personal brand is quite good right now.
Ripping up USMCA or giving veto power to provinces doesn't strike me as common sense
Trump don't seem to know anything about anything. He just do stuff depending on his mood and whim.
I rather the NDP keep Singh then fall into the stupid trap of replacing him with Bloc-Lite Nationalistes like Caron or Boulerice
The NDP needs to keep Singh. He's the best thing the NDP has going right now
I would agree that Singh has had a good campaign. Also helped, probably, by still being relatively unknown to low-information voters, who would only be getting a real look at him now.People have been talking up Singh because... he's been doing really well. In the few weeks of the campaign his popularity has increased 10 points.
At the moment it doesn't look like an Orange Wave is about to sweep the nation, but the upside for the NDP at least is that it seems like Singh has made some gains and positive connections. This probably means that even if, as expected, there's a substantial regression of NDP fortunes in Quebec, there's not going to be a rush to boot Singh from the leadership role.
He will never win in Quebec, I'm not sure how the NDP ever hopes to win without winning over QC.
He's a good representative of the party.
True, he would need a wave like in 2015. Which is hard to synthesize considering they would have to leave out Quebec AND the pairies. But he could do the work to set the stage for a leader who can. Either way, the NDP will need to figure out how they break through.
If you didn't get your voter information card or if the information on it is wrong, your voter information may not be up to date. Use the Online Voter Registration Service, contact your local Elections Canada office or call us at 1-800-463-6868 to check and update your information.My girlfriend received her voter card... and a vote card with someone else's name on it? Any advice on what to do?
Conservative internal polling must be bad if they are still continuing to spread likely false rumours about trudeau in newspapers like the Sun
I am not talking about election fraud but something much worseSpreading rumors about election fraud is even worse, although I've seen PP do that before.
I can see PM Scheer enacting an "Old Stock Canadian Elections Act"
you know for a hardcore NDP supporter you sure like to post a lot of conservative tweets
I am not talking about election fraud but something much worse
I'm not entirely sure what's so hilarious about that clip. He's apologizing to kids who asked a tough question. I thought he handled it moderately well?Thanks for the tip. Next time I post a video of Prime Minister Blackface making an ass of himself I'll make sure it's from a more appropriate source.
I'm not worried, I just want the election to be over and for Kinsella to fuck off.Most likely a big pile of nothing, like last time. Let's learn the lesson from a few days ago and stay calm this time. lol!