No, sorry but I'd side with any other company in the same situation. IMO Sapkowski's demand is akin to placing a bet on a fairly safe runner in a race, then demanding to retroactively change that bet after the race because the 1000/1 shot that you ignored a tip about won.
I have big problems with the idea that someone can willingly accept a deal that's risk free and advantageous to them in the short term, then demand more money years later when it turns out that the riskier deal that they refused would have paid off in the long term.
He could have accepted royalties, or he could have negotiated time or sales based renegotiation clauses in the contract, but no, he signed over the rights in perpetuity for a tiny amount because he thought that the game would fail, the rights would return to him, and he'd be quids in with no risk.
Hold on, I'm going to sign a legally binding contract and sell you something, and a few years later I'm going to ask you for more money cuz 'I was wrong and made a mistake and undervalued my asset/work/IP'.
Yeah, no. That's not how life works.
I know right? Who cares about signing legally binding documents like contracts? Life isn't about that amiright?
I am shocked at how oblivious some of you are to real life. You seem to have some ideas that will be detrimental to your future financial decisions. Even a high schooler has more sense than that. Seriously...I honestly hope that you'll care and pay attention to what contracts you sign.
And yeah, Sapkowski is a greedy asshole. He should've accepted royalties from the beginning, not ask for them when he saw the games mde big money, after he already forfeited royalties.
He was alredy compensated, according to the terms of his own choosing. Asking for more money later is just greed.
...which noone would have known about in the west if it wasn't for the gamesWho created an incredible fantasyworld full of compellingcharacters
He certainly isn't. He's collaborating witht the TV series as far as I know.They know they paid too little, they gave the option and he took what he believed was right.
He was wrong and missed out on tons of cash.
Hopefully both parties are happy with the outcome now and everyone got what they deserved and Sapkowski doesn't underestimate other mediums going forward.
And the games would have no basis if it weren't for his books....which noone would have known about in the west if it wasn't for the games
Poland is not the west?...which noone would have known about in the west if it wasn't for the games
Just think how great an upcoming mid to late-gen Witcher game would be. I'm glad things have worked out this way.
But this also means there is inherent unfairness in our society when it comes to gaming. He gets to shit on gaming medium AND profit from it because gaming is still silly and has no principles. He basically shouldered his way into compensation.I've always understood it that artists should be paid what they're due.
10k on a series that has earned millions is NOT proper compensation by any barometer. It's understandable that initially, that was the best they could offer, but now the series is a success thanks to the symbiotic relationship between his written work and the game company.
Writing up a whole world with lore and characters isn't easy. They've been using all that creative content that he spent countless hours on, spanning books.
He could be a decrepit sack of sentient bones that thinks gaming is satanic, and he STILL deserves to be compensated properly for his work.
That anyone can gleefully enjoy The Witcher game series, and then come here and say it's okay that he got paid out the equivalent of what a minimum wage American makes in a year is...idk, weird.
And it seems Polish Law agrees that he should be able to renegotiate the terms of the contract. And CDPR also agreed to a settlement.
You mean the website of sore fired people? NiceMost likely going he Glass Door reviews. They have a 3.3 rating. Some pretty vocal critics who work there.
He was an old man thatprobably didn't know shit about the videogame industry and the concept of a game selling for millions might have been alien to him.
He also signed that contract for the first game when cd projekt was completely unknown, I'm sure he didn't know he was giving them the rights for all eternity.
Cd projekt was taking advantage of that ridiculous contract and they looked shady for doing so. But then cd projekt fans/gamers see an old man talking shit about them/videogames and he suddenly deserves to rot in a hole.
I'll give this another shot.
THERE IS NO DEAL YET. The original Puls Biznesu article is based on off-the-record statements by "people close to the case." It says that hopefully an agreement can be reached by the end of February and the general takeaway is that while an amicable solution is likely, it is still not certain. The article does mention additional royalties and "a special form of recognition" for Sapkowski but merely as speculation on what he might get in the end according to an unnamed source whose relation to the case is not established within the text.
So again, no agreement has been reached yet.
So is he paying CDPR from all the extra books he sold thanks to their games?
I doubt his books would be in every freaking book store across Europe if it weren't for the games.
He was the one doing the screwing. CDPR wanted to give him a royalty deal at first but he demanded a hefty one time price for it. Dudes a douchebag. He was fine with screwing them until they became big.So, according to some users here, as the author was being mean to those who screwed him and were making millions out of his ip, he didn't deserved any of the money. Is that correct?