They have covered it, but have they reached out to GOG and tried to pressure them for comments?
I didn't read it on the RPS article, and my comment to the article suggesting that they should was deleted.
Yesterday I kept thinking I was going to get banned as well for doing a post against the ban of CDPR/GOG discussion on the forum because other posts in chain replying to me got banned
https://www.resetera.com/posts/14156958/
There are more that I don't understand. I understand that moderating a thread like this is hard though.
which reads like defending CDP's right to be transphobic.without taking into consideration that entities have all right to hold their own view no matter if its wrong
who says? You?This. I would describe myself socially as open-minded as it gets, I am member of a liberal party in our country, one of the nicest persons I know is transgender and yet the toxic mood in this very thread kept me from posting, because honestly some of the user's comments and the bannings of "dismissing concerns" worry me more than the initial tweet, I really don't think this is the forum culture we want. I wholeheartly and deeply respect the concerns of people who are affected by shitty government decisions and especially minorities here, not only in the US. But I don't think it is helpful for anyone to follow hardliner's povs, in every direction of the spectrum, even under the disguise of human rights ("well-intentioned is often the opposite of well done"). Maybe it is because of my advanced age or because people have been killed until 30 years ago for stating their opinion or fleeing from persecution in communist regimes only 30km away from here, but freedom of speech should NEVER be limited because of some ill-minded comments or what we think they meant. If it is bannable to have a balanced point of view and not start a witchhunt out of every tweet, then please enjoy your bubble, The fear to join a discussion will kill this or every other place, and I think most of the people on here wouldn't support such an environment. Which would be a shame, because I like this place in general.
I'm pretty sure it's this line which reads like defending CDP's right to be transphobic.
Also, bans aren't always about specific posts. The person you linked to in particular had already made comments in the thread about the LAST time this happened with CDP and it was the same downplaying nonsense. That linked post was just the tipping point.
Kotaku's Heather Alexandra found out from GOG that they don't have a vetting process for their social media.A question I've asked before, but that have gone unanswered, has any gaming site covering this actually reached out to GOG for comments?
Show me someone who's been banned in this thread for a "balanced point of view".
What, hypothetically, would be this balanced-yet-bannable point of view you are talking about? Can you point to an example of such a balanced viewpoint having earned a ban?
I would love some clarification on what you mean by "under the disguise of human rights"
Hey look, the year old 28 post count account did his job in getting a bunch of people to quote/reply to him.
"A minority cant be all militant and then expect to be treated as if they are magnanimous in all things."Yesterday I kept thinking I was going to get banned as well for doing a post against the ban of CDPR/GOG discussion on the forum because other posts in chain replying to me got banned
https://www.resetera.com/posts/14156958/
There are more that I don't understand. I understand that moderating a thread like this is hard though.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-4#post-14078088
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-7#post-14079131
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-8#post-14079251
What has the number of posts to do with it? I was on NeoGAF for years as well with only a few hundred posts, I just don't have time to stay on message boards all day.
And I am really not in need for quotes and replies, I couldn't care less actually.
Kotaku's Heather Alexandra found out from GOG that they don't have a vetting process for their social media.
I meant that I can understand their good intentions by pointing their finger, but throwing the baby out with the bathwater with wanting censorships or bans of discussions.
If those are the 3 posts you could find to prove your point, then you really didn't have a point to begin with.https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-4#post-14078088
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-7#post-14079131
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-8#post-14079251
I meant that I can understand their good intentions by pointing their finger, but throwing the baby out with the bathwater with wanting censorships or bans of discussions.
What has the number of posts to do with it? I was on NeoGAF for years as well with only a few hundred posts, I just don't have time to stay on message boards all day.
And I am really not in need for quotes and replies, I couldn't care less actually.
This is not a tone deaf response or accidental usage of a hashtag, but the third time they have done something like this. Posts which attempt to downplay or dismiss the transphobic nature of the tweet or play things off as simply tone deaf will be moderated appropriately.
Who the fuck would know what the hell the tweet is about? I learn new stuff here on ERA everyday.
No, i dont follow companies on twitter
Yes, i have turned off all notifications on ny phone
No, i don't feel the need to have knowledge of all things related to every minority groups's struggle on a micro level.
I'll have to ask why you would want to enforce it in here in the first place.
It's almost like trans people have to deal with people either hating them to the point of wanting to erase their existence, or the mass majority simply not caring about them on a daily basis.
The fact that you posted these well deserved bans as worrying you more than the transphobic tweets has me thinking maybe you don't understand what was so bad about the tweets.
You forgot: No, you are not a PR/Social Media Manager. The guy who posted all the posts is.
I'd rather GOG/CDPR discussion continue on this forum but with a mod notice at the very top of any relevant OTs summarising how awful they are.
Would be a good compromise.
Me? I don't want to enforce anything. In my opinion people are free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't harm others. Again: I suggested a voting process, just in case mods are thinking about enforcing a CDPR ban. If they aren't. No voting process needed, but for when the majority wishes for one.
Sorry, you are bringing up two different problems.
I'm talking about putting people under suspicion, because they do not participate in a discussion.
You are talking about people being killed because of their sexual orientation.
One is a terrible, inhuman crime. The other one is a wrong attitude: It's called prejudice. Granted, this kind of "attitude" can get people killed in non democracies, but not in our western world. It can still be harmful though.
Putting everybody under general suspicion because of the bad/dangerous ideology of a minority isn't justifiable though. Should we allow our governments to look into our private lives? Everybody could be a terrorist in this day and age...What? You don't want that. This surely means that you have something to hide. It's suspicious.
You are following the exact same logic here. Not participating = Having something to hide. I've grown up in a pseudo democratic-socialistic state. In truth it was a fascist regime. That kind of prejudice killed people and it still scares me. I don't think you even understand what I'm talking about. In your eyes general suspicion is justified because of the world view of another minority. A minority with a terrible world view.
Why don't you just do the right thing and do what I do: write a letter to your delegate. I did and encouraged my delegate to vote for the new LGBT law in 2017. It probably did nothing and influenced nobody. But I'm convinced that this is the right way to influence a democracy!
~10% of users participated in this discussion so far. Therefore ~90% are bad people and morally inferior to you. Sure thing. Keep on hallucinating.
I don't think I've seen a single person say what you're claiming they're saying.Me? I don't want to enforce anything. In my opinion people are free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't harm others. Again: I suggested a voting process, just in case mods are thinking about enforcing a CDPR ban. If they aren't. No voting process needed, but for when the majority wishes for one.
Sorry, you are bringing up two different problems.
I'm talking about putting people under suspicion, because they do not participate in a discussion.
You are talking about people being killed because of their sexual orientation.
One is a terrible, inhuman crime. The other one is a wrong attitude: It's called prejudice. Granted, this kind of "attitude" can get people killed in non democracies, but not in our western world. It can still be harmful though.
Putting everybody under general suspicion because of the bad/dangerous ideology of a minority isn't justifiable though. Should we allow our governments to look into our private lives? Everybody could be a terrorist in this day and age...What? You don't want that. This surely means that you have something to hide. It's suspicious.
You are following the exact same logic here. Not participating = Having something to hide. I've grown up in a pseudo democratic-socialistic state. In truth it was a fascist regime. That kind of prejudice killed people and it still scares me. I don't think you even understand what I'm talking about. In your eyes general suspicion is justified because of the world view of another minority. A minority with a terrible world view.
Why don't you just do the right thing and do what I do: write a letter to your delegate. I did and encouraged my delegate to vote for the new LGBT law in 2017. It probably did nothing and influenced nobody. But I'm convinced that this is the right way to influence a democracy!
~10% of users participated in this discussion so far. Therefore ~90% are bad people and morally inferior to you. Sure thing. Keep on hallucinating.
~10% of users participated in this discussion so far. Therefore ~90% are bad people and morally inferior to you. Sure thing. Keep on hallucinating.
Honestly, I think this mod post:
makes it very clear that the mods (and thus, this community) have taken a stance on the matter. The nature of those tweets and their interpretation is not up for discussion. This is a persistent and intentional behaviour.
Kotaku's Heather Alexandra found out from GOG that they don't have a vetting process for their social media.
True, although even when pressed, I'm guessing GoG/CDPR don't want to give a statement. Their silence is telling. Don't know much longer they can be given.That's from the previous debacle though. It's when this happens again, as it have now, that I would have hoped that gaming sites would press them even further.
True, although even when pressed, I'm guessing GoG/CDPR don't want to give a statement. Their silence is telling. Don't know much longer they can be given.
Granted, this kind of "attitude" can get people killed in non democracies, but not in our western world.
I like this approach. People should get told how awful they are. Also comes with the added bonus of educating people about their politics who are genuinely unaware.