• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 8593

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
27,176
Not sure what the problem is. ERA creating an atmosphere where people are scared to post their shitty hot takes that diminish the plight of minorities sounds like a great idea to me. There's a billion other places where you can do that and get away scot-free.
 

Deleted member 41271

User requested account closure
Banned
Mar 21, 2018
2,258
If it is bannable to have a balanced point of view

I am very sorry, but "The company should not be criticized for transphobia" is not a balanced point of view. Nor is this:

and not start a witchhunt out of every tweet

Criticizing a company for mocking transfolk and appeasing gamergaters is not a witch hunt, and that you use this specific term is very revealing about you. Gotta love dudes using a term referring to men burning women out of male hysteria to ...dudes being criticized for mocking transpeople.
Yes, exactly the same as burning people on the stake, criticizing people in a forum. This is very balanced.

Again, that you are this upset that a company gets criticism speaks volumes. Why are we not allowed to criticize a company? Why is this a witch hunt? Why do you have more sympathy for a company than for the people in a minority the company has now mocked multiple times?


Is criticizing a company really so much worse than a company actively, multiple times, mocking LGBT people? :/ Do we really live in a world where companies deserve so much more compassion than some of the most villified minorities?
 

Jebusman

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,081
Halifax, NS
Yesterday I kept thinking I was going to get banned as well for doing a post against the ban of CDPR/GOG discussion on the forum because other posts in chain replying to me got banned

https://www.resetera.com/posts/14156958/

There are more that I don't understand. I understand that moderating a thread like this is hard though.

I'm pretty sure it's this line
without taking into consideration that entities have all right to hold their own view no matter if its wrong
which reads like defending CDP's right to be transphobic.

Also, bans aren't always about specific posts. The person you linked to in particular had already made comments in the thread about the LAST time this happened with CDP and it was the same downplaying nonsense. That linked post was just the tipping point.
 

disparate

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,904
This. I would describe myself socially as open-minded as it gets, I am member of a liberal party in our country, one of the nicest persons I know is transgender and yet the toxic mood in this very thread kept me from posting, because honestly some of the user's comments and the bannings of "dismissing concerns" worry me more than the initial tweet, I really don't think this is the forum culture we want. I wholeheartly and deeply respect the concerns of people who are affected by shitty government decisions and especially minorities here, not only in the US. But I don't think it is helpful for anyone to follow hardliner's povs, in every direction of the spectrum, even under the disguise of human rights ("well-intentioned is often the opposite of well done"). Maybe it is because of my advanced age or because people have been killed until 30 years ago for stating their opinion or fleeing from persecution in communist regimes only 30km away from here, but freedom of speech should NEVER be limited because of some ill-minded comments or what we think they meant. If it is bannable to have a balanced point of view and not start a witchhunt out of every tweet, then please enjoy your bubble, The fear to join a discussion will kill this or every other place, and I think most of the people on here wouldn't support such an environment. Which would be a shame, because I like this place in general.
who says? You?
 

Arkanius

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,144
I'm pretty sure it's this line which reads like defending CDP's right to be transphobic.

Also, bans aren't always about specific posts. The person you linked to in particular had already made comments in the thread about the LAST time this happened with CDP and it was the same downplaying nonsense. That linked post was just the tipping point.

That's what I get for reading in diagonal. Thanks
 

Freed Games

Member
Oct 29, 2017
159
Austria
User Banned (1 Month): Excusing transphobia; driving thread derailment. Account still in junior phase.
Show me someone who's been banned in this thread for a "balanced point of view".

As well as some examples of "balanced" posts being banned.

What, hypothetically, would be this balanced-yet-bannable point of view you are talking about? Can you point to an example of such a balanced viewpoint having earned a ban?

https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-4#post-14078088
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-7#post-14079131
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-8#post-14079251

I would love some clarification on what you mean by "under the disguise of human rights"

I meant that I can understand their good intentions by pointing their finger, but throwing the baby out with the bathwater with wanting censorships or bans of discussions.

Hey look, the year old 28 post count account did his job in getting a bunch of people to quote/reply to him.

What has the number of posts to do with it? I was on NeoGAF for years as well with only a few hundred posts, I just don't have time to stay on message boards all day.
And I am really not in need for quotes and replies, I couldn't care less actually.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Flammable D

Flammable D

Member
Oct 30, 2017
15,205
Yesterday I kept thinking I was going to get banned as well for doing a post against the ban of CDPR/GOG discussion on the forum because other posts in chain replying to me got banned

https://www.resetera.com/posts/14156958/

There are more that I don't understand. I understand that moderating a thread like this is hard though.
"A minority cant be all militant and then expect to be treated as if they are magnanimous in all things."

Wow what a valuable poster we lost there

As you said, you haven't been banned for expressing that opinion. Many others havent. There's a reason others have.

EDIT: Missed that someone else had already replied and explained, didn't mean to pile.
 

Deleted member 41271

User requested account closure
Banned
Mar 21, 2018
2,258
I'm really, really upset that this keeps happening, that "witch hunt" in particular is what people use to describe a company getting criticism for harming real people.

Witch hunts were the time where angry clergymen and male doctors used superstition to murder many innocent women, killing them in a horrible way for the sole crime of being different or, in some cases, being competition to the doctor. It was a time where people in power used their power to harm the weakest members in their society.

And now, criticism for a company is equaled to this. I'm seriously shaking my head. That people like "Freed Games" have so incredibly little empathy for real people that a company gets more compassion than real people, over and over and over and over again in this thread, is just... really hard to even say something to that that won't get me banned. It's just so utterly callous.

You cannot possibly believe that LGBT people are the one wielding the power over poor, defenseless companies here. It's completely, utterly, utterly absurd.
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-4#post-14078088
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-7#post-14079131
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-8#post-14079251



What has the number of posts to do with it? I was on NeoGAF for years as well with only a few hundred posts, I just don't have time to stay on message boards all day.
And I am really not in need for quotes and replies, I couldn't care less actually.

All three posts are blatantly ignoring the OP mod warning, with the last post bitching about "mah games have politics!!!"

Some great examples you found
 

Spyware

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,455
Sweden
Kotaku's Heather Alexandra found out from GOG that they don't have a vetting process for their social media.

Soon after that they posted job ads for PR Managers in NA and UK. There is nothing specifically about social media in the listed responsibilities but there is stuff about supervising the quality of overall PR, and in the qualifications part they list "A minimum of 3 years of experience with brand communications, forums, and social media in games development industry."
Might be just a coincidence. Might also have been a wake-up call.

Edit: And with "that" I am referring to the Cyberpunk tweet and CDPR, not GOG/CDP, sorry for the confusion.
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
I meant that I can understand their good intentions by pointing their finger, but throwing the baby out with the bathwater with wanting censorships or bans of discussions.

That's not what you said, you said under "disguise of human", which means there are inherently ulterior motives at work.

As well as ignoring the fact that you think a "witch-hunt" is happening because a company has decided to signal boost a misogynistic movement and make fun of and marginalize the issue trans people face three times now.
 

NickMitch

Member
Nov 1, 2017
1,289
Using a minority group as a "marketing" skit seems very suspicious.

Gaming is a mainstream entertainment business.

And if not "intended". Who the fuck would know what the hell the tweet is about? I learn new stuff here on ERA everyday.

No. Im not an activist

Yes. I believe in equal rights

No, i dont follow companies on twitter

Yes, i have turned off all notifications on ny phone

Yes, GOG and CPR better stop with this shit if they want to be in business.

No, i don't feel the need to have knowledge of all things related to every minority groups's struggle on a micro level.
 

Deleted member 1849

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,986
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-4#post-14078088
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-7#post-14079131
https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...e-from-gog-read-op.76395/page-8#post-14079251



I meant that I can understand their good intentions by pointing their finger, but throwing the baby out with the bathwater with wanting censorships or bans of discussions.



What has the number of posts to do with it? I was on NeoGAF for years as well with only a few hundred posts, I just don't have time to stay on message boards all day.
And I am really not in need for quotes and replies, I couldn't care less actually.
If those are the 3 posts you could find to prove your point, then you really didn't have a point to begin with.

They all deserved their ban. Ignoring mod warnings, bullshit "keep politics out of videogames", etc.
 

Visanideth

Banned
Oct 31, 2017
4,771
Honestly, I think this mod post:

This is not a tone deaf response or accidental usage of a hashtag, but the third time they have done something like this. Posts which attempt to downplay or dismiss the transphobic nature of the tweet or play things off as simply tone deaf will be moderated appropriately.

makes it very clear that the mods (and thus, this community) have taken a stance on the matter. The nature of those tweets and their interpretation is not up for discussion. This is a persistent and intentional behaviour.

And this makes the request for banning the discussion on GoG/CDPR legitimate. If we as a community have decided that a certain developer and/or his associates have engaged in transphobic behaviour, then we can't as a community that wants to define itself as progressive turn our back to the people who we feel are victim of this kind of message. We can't say "this is transphobic" and then provide a platform for advertisement and visibility to those who perpetrated it.
The mods have made it very clear that the seriousness and intent of those tweets are not up to discussion; now we need to put money where our mouth is and take action, even if it may mean losing some traffic. We have a history of banning creators and influencers based on their views and words, saying that what CDP has done (three times) wasn't bad enough to warrant the same reaction would justify questioning the priorities of the community.
 

Deleted member 41271

User requested account closure
Banned
Mar 21, 2018
2,258
Thanks, NickMitch, for showing that ACTUALLY balanced posts still exist. Mean it. Nobody has to be an activist or know of all things related to every minority.

(no irony in the post btw, just had to point out that for all the "balanced post get punished", yours had to be highlighted as a good example of the contrary.
 

Bufbaf

Don't F5!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,640
Hamburg, Germany
Who the fuck would know what the hell the tweet is about? I learn new stuff here on ERA everyday.

No, i dont follow companies on twitter

Yes, i have turned off all notifications on ny phone

No, i don't feel the need to have knowledge of all things related to every minority groups's struggle on a micro level.

You forgot: No, you are not a PR/Social Media Manager. The guy who posted all the posts is, which makes it even worse.
 

Isee

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
6,235
I'll have to ask why you would want to enforce it in here in the first place.

Me? I don't want to enforce anything. In my opinion people are free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't harm others. Again: I suggested a voting process, just in case mods are thinking about enforcing a CDPR ban. If they aren't. No voting process needed, but for when the majority wishes for one.

It's almost like trans people have to deal with people either hating them to the point of wanting to erase their existence, or the mass majority simply not caring about them on a daily basis.

Sorry, you are bringing up two different problems.

I'm talking about putting people under suspicion, because they do not participate in a discussion.
You are talking about people being killed because of their sexual orientation.
One is a terrible, inhuman crime. The other one is a wrong attitude: It's called prejudice. Granted, this kind of "attitude" can get people killed in non democracies, but not in our western world. It can still be harmful though.

Putting everybody under general suspicion because of the bad/dangerous ideology of a minority isn't justifiable though. Should we allow our governments to look into our private lives? Everybody could be a terrorist in this day and age...What? You don't want that. This surely means that you have something to hide. It's suspicious.

You are following the exact same logic here. Not participating = Having something to hide. I've grown up in a pseudo democratic-socialistic state. In truth it was a fascist regime. That kind of prejudice killed people and it still scares me. I don't think you even understand what I'm talking about. In your eyes general suspicion is justified because of the world view of another minority. A minority with a terrible world view.
Why don't you just do the right thing and do what I do: write a letter to your delegate. I did and encouraged my delegate to vote for the new LGBT law in 2017. It probably did nothing and influenced nobody. But I'm convinced that this is the right way to influence a democracy!

~10% of users participated in this discussion so far. Therefore ~90% are bad people and morally inferior to you. Sure thing. Keep on hallucinating.
 

MrMysterio

Member
Oct 25, 2017
701
I'd rather GOG/CDPR discussion continue on this forum but with a mod notice at the very top of any relevant OTs summarising how awful they are.

Would be a good compromise.

I like this approach. People should get told how awful they are. Also comes with the added bonus of educating people about their politics who are genuinely unaware.
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
Me? I don't want to enforce anything. In my opinion people are free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't harm others. Again: I suggested a voting process, just in case mods are thinking about enforcing a CDPR ban. If they aren't. No voting process needed, but for when the majority wishes for one.



Sorry, you are bringing up two different problems.

I'm talking about putting people under suspicion, because they do not participate in a discussion.
You are talking about people being killed because of their sexual orientation.
One is a terrible, inhuman crime. The other one is a wrong attitude: It's called prejudice. Granted, this kind of "attitude" can get people killed in non democracies, but not in our western world. It can still be harmful though.

Putting everybody under general suspicion because of the bad/dangerous ideology of a minority isn't justifiable though. Should we allow our governments to look into our private lives? Everybody could be a terrorist in this day and age...What? You don't want that. This surely means that you have something to hide. It's suspicious.

You are following the exact same logic here. Not participating = Having something to hide. I've grown up in a pseudo democratic-socialistic state. In truth it was a fascist regime. That kind of prejudice killed people and it still scares me. I don't think you even understand what I'm talking about. In your eyes general suspicion is justified because of the world view of another minority. A minority with a terrible world view.
Why don't you just do the right thing and do what I do: write a letter to your delegate. I did and encouraged my delegate to vote for the new LGBT law in 2017. It probably did nothing and influenced nobody. But I'm convinced that this is the right way to influence a democracy!

~10% of users participated in this discussion so far. Therefore ~90% are bad people and morally inferior to you. Sure thing. Keep on hallucinating.

Nope, nobody ever said that. But the people who come into a thread and bitch about bans, tone police people who are at their wits end for living in a country that is trying to remove what little rights they have, and just generally derailing things, might need to do some self reflection.

You're coming off very defensive and insecure.
 
Last edited:

Eumi

Member
Nov 3, 2017
3,518
Me? I don't want to enforce anything. In my opinion people are free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't harm others. Again: I suggested a voting process, just in case mods are thinking about enforcing a CDPR ban. If they aren't. No voting process needed, but for when the majority wishes for one.



Sorry, you are bringing up two different problems.

I'm talking about putting people under suspicion, because they do not participate in a discussion.
You are talking about people being killed because of their sexual orientation.
One is a terrible, inhuman crime. The other one is a wrong attitude: It's called prejudice. Granted, this kind of "attitude" can get people killed in non democracies, but not in our western world. It can still be harmful though.

Putting everybody under general suspicion because of the bad/dangerous ideology of a minority isn't justifiable though. Should we allow our governments to look into our private lives? Everybody could be a terrorist in this day and age...What? You don't want that. This surely means that you have something to hide. It's suspicious.

You are following the exact same logic here. Not participating = Having something to hide. I've grown up in a pseudo democratic-socialistic state. In truth it was a fascist regime. That kind of prejudice killed people and it still scares me. I don't think you even understand what I'm talking about. In your eyes general suspicion is justified because of the world view of another minority. A minority with a terrible world view.
Why don't you just do the right thing and do what I do: write a letter to your delegate. I did and encouraged my delegate to vote for the new LGBT law in 2017. It probably did nothing and influenced nobody. But I'm convinced that this is the right way to influence a democracy!

~10% of users participated in this discussion so far. Therefore ~90% are bad people and morally inferior to you. Sure thing. Keep on hallucinating.
I don't think I've seen a single person say what you're claiming they're saying.

Like, who the hell is saying that you either post in this thread or your transphobic?
 

Jebusman

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,081
Halifax, NS
~10% of users participated in this discussion so far. Therefore ~90% are bad people and morally inferior to you. Sure thing. Keep on hallucinating.

But no one has said this. YOU have said this. YOU are the only one making this insinuation. What people have mentioned here, is that if you are "afraid" to post in here, because you think your views are going to get you banned, then your views very likely are garbage. This has held true in every situation this "fear" has popped up in just about every contentious thread.

It's not saying every single person who doesn't post in this thread is bad, because I bet 50% of the user base hasn't even seen this thread. If you sit in EtcetERA all day, you wouldn't even know this thread is here.

And if you were indifferent to the topic, or maybe you felt you didn't have anything else to add that people didn't already, you just don't bother posting in it.

Like I genuinely believe you are not here in good faith, because all you seemingly want to do is conflate the idea that people are afraid to post in this thread because of hot headed mods, and you can only construe that as meaning there are unjustified bans in this thread.

What exact posts do you think fit that bill? That last person agreeing with you was willing to do that, and lo and behold, the posts he linked were ones downplaying and handwaving transphobia! What a fucking shocker.
 

NaDannMaGoGo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,963
Honestly, I think this mod post:

makes it very clear that the mods (and thus, this community) have taken a stance on the matter. The nature of those tweets and their interpretation is not up for discussion. This is a persistent and intentional behaviour.

And thankfully they're handing out bans left and right to all the jerks ignoring it, whether purposely or unintentionally.

Because for fuck's sake are those comments annoying interruptions to the discussion no matter what. "Oh hello, I'm extremely self-important and lazy, so how about the lot of you explain to me what I could've already understood if I spend the time reading instead of typing any of this. And in the best case scenario, I'll reply with an 'Ah thanks. Now I understand.', which still isn't a meaningful contribution! Bye!"

That's the less egregious case where they aren't just pretending.
 

Messofanego

Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,105
UK
That's from the previous debacle though. It's when this happens again, as it have now, that I would have hoped that gaming sites would press them even further.
True, although even when pressed, I'm guessing GoG/CDPR don't want to give a statement. Their silence is telling. Don't know much longer they can be given.
 

lowmelody

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,101
Downloaded all my games from GOG and reuploaded them to my cloud and closed account. I will never spend another dime on anything involving CD Projekt again. There is no coming back from this and the pattern leading up to it. If this was an outlier within their culture it would have been weeded out the first times this happened but it's undeniable at this point and so I'm out, forever.

Witcher 3 one of my favorite games, hell, experiences ever. CP2077 is astounding in almost every way.

Next to the human rights of my trans brothers and sisters, however, those things are worth less than shit.

FUCK your vidyas.
 

Deleted member 41271

User requested account closure
Banned
Mar 21, 2018
2,258
Granted, this kind of "attitude" can get people killed in non democracies, but not in our western world.

This is appalling. You're waxing on and on how oppressed you are, and in the middle of all your pretending to be the poor victim, there's this.
I'm sorry, but no.

http://theconversation.com/new-data-shows-us-hate-crimes-continued-to-rise-in-2017-97989

LGBT people get murdered in western democracies for who they are every year, and that's not even including those pushed to suicide, or those "just" attacked brutally.

You're so utterly swamped by your own ego and your desperate wish to be the true victim here that the comments you throw out just get worse and worse. Have you no shame?

I like this approach. People should get told how awful they are. Also comes with the added bonus of educating people about their politics who are genuinely unaware.

Would like this approach too, but I'm generally way too complacent. Even though stuff like Isees post make this ever so difficult.
 

Deleted member 5086

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,571
This thread appears to have devolved into metacommentary and is no longer about the tweet. The discussion therefore appears to have run its course. The serious concerns about CDPR's social media and PR will remain fair game for discussion, as will the games they develop and publish. No blanket ban on these topics is being considered at this time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.