I would imagine getting to the register with your food and the customer says "oh, I forgot my wallet", and they might let you take it anyway. This is actually the policy of a lot of food places. They don't make a scene and deny someone food. I remember seeing a new story about this a while back.
Looks like you are and others are happy to jump to conclusions with little information to go on. I'm stating if she was correct about them coming in before and not paying, they weren't entirely wrong for refusing to serve them based on that past behavior. I'm also stating if she was incorrect about that, she was justifiably fired. Either way it wouldn't matter for her. Corporate was going to shitcan her based on the optics alone. You are correct the thing she should have done was to make the food and eat the cost. All I'm saying is IF she is correct, its not wrong to refuse service to someone based on a history of not paying. Neither of us have the information to determine whether or not she was correct. All corporate has said on the matter is that she believed these particular customers were repeat offenders. They said regardless of the fact, she acted inappropriately according to their policy. Nothing about whether she was correct about that being the same person or group or not. That doesn't make her racist...IF that's true. I'm not going to shit down someone's neck unless I know the facts.
Lol I never said she wasn't mistaken. What're you mad about? You're just arguing with me to argue, you're not even proving a point.
They make it as you order it, sorta like an assembly line for burrito. In this case, they weren't even going to start making it unless provided they money upfront.
It's like a cafeteria with the food already out and walking along telling them what you want before paying
So what exactly do these words mean?
Lmfao.astro said:
This is garbage reasoning. She has seen them before and knows something? Based on what evidence?
I'll help you out, dw.
I'm drunk way too early in the day but even I know the OP outlined everything you're "concerned" about.
"Nah, can't trust those black guys, there's gotta be something there." is what some of those posts read like to me.
I just don't see how this could have turned out better, unless somehow she had security footage proving they've come in and done this before. If she'd called the cops and the guys denied ever getting food without paying, and posted it to social media I think it's quite likely this story has the exact same outcome.
The news story only has a quote from Chipotle saying she thought they'd done this before, and they didn't like how she handled it. They offered no opinion on whether she was correct on that point.
I go to Chipotle a lot, and I've literally been behind a person who said they forgot their wallet at the register, and they just told them to take the food and not worry about it.
Your next post claimed it was "obvious". I think it's more "obvious" that you didn't see her say that. You were called out on it by me and another poster. And then you had to cover yourself to make it seem like you actually watched the video before posting an outraged comment by stating that it was so obvious that you didn't believe it. When in fact I'm willing to bet you never saw it before posting.
Outraged just to be outraged. Pathetic, honestly. Absolutely no information to go on whether she was correct about them or not and you just scream "Racism". Whether or not she broke company policy is irrelevant. That doesn't make it immoral and certainly not racist. The version of events you choose to believe are everybit a "hypothetical" as mine because you have absolutely not proof to the contrary. Not even Chipotle corpoate denies what she said. That's a fact.
