But you provided the example as if it's standard behavior and the norm...when it isn't
What limits? That's the same kinda misogynistic jokes stand up comedians have been doing since forever.
That explored the complexity of feelings for a man who both broke a lot of ground for black folk in show business/ provided a role model on TV for black families when there weren't many and was a total monster...
It's got a much clearer and meaningful thesis.
It was bad material but that's the point of these touring shows, is to try out material to see what works and what doesn't, to put together a good set for a cable special. He's probably had a ton of tone deaf duds before, that just were before everyone was a reporter with a video camera.
Tracy Morgan for example joked if he found out his son was gay he would stab him. I don't believe for a minute that is true, it's just a really terribly thought out absurd joke he was trying and after crowd reaction never tried again.
Material like this often builds to form a subversive argument against the basis of the joke itself when put into the larger context of the set, but when something bombs that badly you don't really find out where it was headed.
Comedians poke the audience to see what the limits of acceptable are. Good comedians observe that limit and learn from it in future performances while less good comedians don't learn from it and go on Twitter and whine about PC culture making their jokes bomb. Or in the case of someone like a Tosh or a Michael Richards have on stage meltdowns and take it out on their live audience.
I fully agree, I just think the people saying there is no possible way to joke about rape and be funny are missing the mark.
It's an extremely volatile topic but that's what most comedians aim for. How you execute the joke is the key differentiator between what Chris is dealing with and how Chappelle's joke came across, both generally about the topic of rape.
It's not off limits. It's that it sounds like it wasn't funny and was built off a shaky premise. This post is a concise breakdown of why it doesn't work:Chappelle and Rock have both made murder, AIDs and centuries of oppression and suffering funny.
I don't know why this particular topic is off limits. I'm sure some people have personal reasons and experiences that justify such but it comes off as an arbitrary rule.
The problem with this joke is that the 'women lie about rape for money' isn't the joke. It's the premise upon which the joke is built ('Chris Rock's reaction is hilariously extreme'). Offensive jokes are, I would argue, okay. But the offensive part of this isn't the joke. It's the part that you have to take as true at face value for the joke to work. That's the problem with it.
It's not off limits. It's that it sounds like it wasn't funny and was built off a shaky premise. This post is a concise breakdown of why it doesn't work:
That something happens doe not mean it happens regularly, often, or even infrequently.I was referring more to overall. Rape has always been more off-limits than any other subject.
Also, my problem with that problem of yours is that such things have in fact happened before and could very well happen with the current scandal.