haha nice tryI love how Hader mocks it, yet it's better performed and written than most of his movies.
I love how Hader mocks it, yet it's better performed and written than most of his movies.
Clearly not the only one, just look at the dislikes, but I'm glad people find it funny.I never find these videos to be funny. I guess i am the only one.
To be fair, I can't imagine anyone making ARMS entertaining.I do agree that this was unfunny though. Celebrities add nothing to this. Arms was the worst episode, and I like Will Arnett.
C'mon dude he's joking, stereotypes in jokes are nothing new. Is ok if you don't like it but If not insulting you have to deal with it.Demeaning to the medium, its fans, and the artists who bring it to life.
As always.
Perpetuation of the meme of gamers as lonely nerds is harmful to the industry, as are these videos. One man's opinion.
On the flip-side, Life Is Strange taught me about depression and suicideI thought it was funny, and I'm a big fan of Bill Hader and Conan, but that whole "I don't think anyone plays a videogames and goes "You know what, this videogame taught me that I need to have a better relationship with my son"' is just a completely out of touch, woefully outdated viewpoint on games.
I suppose that's kinda sorta the point though, hence the "Clueless Gamer" moniker.
I thought the ARMS episode was fucking hilarious. Arnett was fantastic.
Yeah, Ubisoft put no effort into the characters in their games. What the hell am I reading?I think the real issue here is that Sony shouldn't have sent their marquee title to Conan just so he can poke fun at it.
The difference between Sony games and EA/Ubisoft stuff that gets sent to Conan is that Sony actually puts an effort into crafting characters, their relationships, and its disheartening to see it get mocked or completely ignored as both Bill and Conan spend more time cracking jokes than actually paying attention to whats going on. I love Clueless gamer but he used to actually play these games and comment on what was happening, but here they are both just flat out ignoring what was happening on screen.
And thats ok. He needs to make the audience laugh. Thats his job. What's not ok is Sony taking something that 300 of their employees have put their heart and soul into making it a cut above other games in the medium when it comes to storytelling and character development and turn it into a joke.
That said, i dont work at SSM and I dont know if they found this funny or disheartening, but I am assuming they probably didnt care for it.
P.S Conan always makes fun of that guy droning on and on about the game's plot instead of just playing the game and yet this video spent two minutes just goofing around before they even brought him in. Kinda ironic. Conan needs to go back to just making this a series with him and his friend playing the game. They were more fun than having these celebrities come in and just pimp their own tv show.
AC is the only series where Ubisoft actually gives a shit about character development and they typically fall short every goddamn time. It's been 9 years since AC2 and they still havent come close to creating anything as good as that original Ezio story.Yeah, Ubisoft put no effort into the characters in their games. What the hell am I reading?
I love God of War, but these reactions in this thread are pathetic. People joke about media all the time. Sheesh.
You know this forum is full of such people. It's all about gameplay to them and that's fine if that's what they prefer. I guess Hader likes to have more control and less cutscenes too and isn't looking for anything deep, it's fine. I'm sure he wouldn't start arguing about it if someone pointed out to him that they play games for stories and can be emotionally invested in them. But yeah I would agree that some games have handled big and heavy themes and had stories with something to say or atleast giving something to think about for well over 20 years. It's not just about saving the princess. Of course sometimes the story is just fun or engaging without any heavier real life themes but still has effort put into it, like witty dialogue or flashy cinematics.I thought it was funny, and I'm a big fan of Bill Hader and Conan, but that whole "I don't think anyone plays a videogame and goes "You know what, this videogame taught me that I need to have a better relationship with my son"' is just a completely out of touch, woefully outdated viewpoint on games.
I suppose that's kinda sorta the point though, hence the "Clueless Gamer" moniker.
Barry has really sold me on him, didn't care about him that much before. Some funny small roles where I've seen him like in Apatow comedies. But Barry is damn good. It actually had a video game reference with "Leeroy Jenkins" too!
while the outrage is funny, it's also equally sad. i worry for some of you.Not sure what is more hilarious, Clueless Gamer or the outrage comments in this thread. Lighten up people.
GAMERS RISE UPUS GAMERS SHOULD RISE UP AGAINST CONAN
NO LONGER WILL THEY SAY WE HAVE NO LIFE(BECAUSE WE CHOOSE TO HAVE MANY) WE WILL POWER UP AND SHOW HIM WHATS UP
His mindset ignores the artistic achievement of narrative or "tone" games, but it also severely limits the definition of art. GaaS are often knocked for being toy-like games, merely for titillation, but the relationship between the community and the developers, where people build a product together, that is constantly evolving, is wholly unique in entertainment, and I consider that relationship to be an artistic achievement, along with the feelings that come from interactions with friends. Anything that evokes an emotional response has at least part of what art is - throw on all the objective artistry on display (designers, concept artists, sound effects, animators, musicians, etc.), and games aren't just art - they're arguably the most complete form of art because they include the audience in the process and employ every other possible kind of art we know of so far.Okay, I struggled to make it to 5 minutes but at that mark I'm kinda offended now by Bill Hader mocking people playing video games and how no one is going to care, or even wants to care, about video games characters. Him saying no one plays a video game and learns anything is especially shitty. So I guess by that train of thought, no one's ever read a book and learnt anything. No one's watched a film and learnt anything.
Squenix flew Conan, Elijah Wood and company out to play FFXV and that resulted in an episode that was far, far, far more savage than anything we saw here, and that was with the developers in the next room. If companies are willing to work with Conan after a brutalization like that one, I think that they're a lot better at taking it all in stride than you think.I think the real issue here is that Sony shouldn't have sent their marquee title to Conan just so he can poke fun at it.
The difference between Sony games and EA/Ubisoft stuff that gets sent to Conan is that Sony actually puts an effort into crafting characters, their relationships, and its disheartening to see it get mocked or completely ignored as both Bill and Conan spend more time cracking jokes than actually paying attention to whats going on. I love Clueless gamer but he used to actually play these games and comment on what was happening, but here they are both just flat out ignoring what was happening on screen.
And thats ok. He needs to make the audience laugh. Thats his job. What's not ok is Sony taking something that 300 of their employees have put their heart and soul into making it a cut above other games in the medium when it comes to storytelling and character development and turn it into a joke.
That said, i dont work at SSM and I dont know if they found this funny or disheartening, but I am assuming they probably didnt care for it.
P.S Conan always makes fun of that guy droning on and on about the game's plot instead of just playing the game and yet this video spent two minutes just goofing around before they even brought him in. Kinda ironic. Conan needs to go back to just making this a series with him and his friend playing the game. They were more fun than having these celebrities come in and just pimp their own tv show.
DO NOT READ IF YOU CARE ABOUT ENDGAME SPOILERSWhat was the huge spoiler? All I got from that is Kratos kills.
Nah he is worse. He just wants to remain relevant and famous. He has enough money.He's encouraged to improve through the medium of cold hard cash money
Oh wow I didn’t even notice in the video. Unfortunately I spoiled that for myself even before the game was officially released so no biggie for me. Others might wanna stay away then because that moment is fucking hype.DO NOT READ IF YOU CARE ABOUT ENDGAME SPOILERS
They show off Kratos using the Blades of Chaos, which he gets about 2/3 of the way through the game and was kept a complete secret prior to release. It was implied that the only weapon you would get is the Leviathan Axe.
Cuz he killed that stranger dude I guess?What was the huge spoiler? All I got from that is Kratos kills.
There's no such thing as "complete" or "incomplete" art.and games aren't just art - they're arguably the most complete form of art because they include the audience in the process and employ every other possible kind of art we know of so far.
Someone hasn't seen Barry.I love how Hader mocks it, yet it's better performed and written than most of his movies.
Not everyone sees media as art -- it's also just entertainment.His mindset ignores the artistic achievement of narrative or "tone" games, but it also severely limits the definition of art. GaaS are often knocked for being toy-like games, merely for titillation, but the relationship between the community and the developers, where people build a product together, that is constantly evolving, is wholly unique in entertainment, and I consider that relationship to be an artistic achievement, along with the feelings that come from interactions with friends. Anything that evokes an emotional response has at least part of what art is - throw on all the objective artistry on display (designers, concept artists, sound effects, animators, musicians, etc.), and games aren't just art - they're arguably the most complete form of art because they include the audience in the process and employ every other possible kind of art we know of so far.
To be honest, movies (and to a certain extent, literature) have begun to bore me because I pretty much know what I'm going to get in ten years - the formats are pretty fixed. Games as an art form are so immensely exciting because I have no clue what they'll look like in 10 years. I can predict tech advancements, but that's about it. Something like Destiny would have been inconceivable 20 years ago - but movies haven't really changed much in that time. Games are the one art form that will constantly evolve, and that's thrilling, as a consumer of art.
It's unfortunate that many even in our community don't see the huge potential for this medium that is, more and more, being realized daily.
Well, I had two qualifiers, in "most" and "arguably." But regardless, I'm not making them out to be that - if the primary goal of art is to evoke an emotional response using images, music, sounds, narrative, characters, themes, and design, then games are art. I don't care for opera, but I don't dispute it's art.There's no such thing as "complete" or "incomplete" art.
You don't have to make games out to be some higher form of art just because some, like Conan, don't like games.
That's not what he's saying at all. He clearly said videogames encompass numerous forms of art and passion to create, they're continually evolving, and they're interactive. Hence, art. He finds them superior since they don't have the same limitations other mediums do. Videogames can be anything. You can't play movies or books. I find every form of artistic media its own beast and I appreciate them all for their strengths but I see where he's coming from and I rather agree. There is almost no ceiling for videogames.You don't have to make games out to be some higher form of art just because some, like Conan, don't like games.
That's exactly what he's saying when you point at games and say, "this is complete art" and then point to other forms of art and say, "this is incomplete because it has less components".That's not what he's saying at all. He clearly said videogames encompass numerous forms of art and passion to create, they're continually evolving, and they're interactive. Hence, art. He finds them superior since they don't have the same limitations other mediums do. Videogames can be anything. You can't play movies or books. I find every form of artistic media its own beast and I appreciate them all for their strengths but I see where he's coming from and I rather agree. There is almost no ceiling for videogames.
Indeed, it's art and it's all art equally but different and neither is more or less complete. Just different.Whether or not games are art, it's such a stupid subject in the first place. Anyone who doesn't see videogames as art is a moron. It can't be debated whether or not they're art. Whether or not that art is for you is another subject entirely. However a medium that illicits powerful emotions in people, requires the hard work and passion of one to hundreds of people, with the outcome being a visual, interactive work of art, I'm pretty sure that medium is considered art. Hence, to deny that, is idiocy.
It would be preposterous for me to say that about a video game because it's art.I find it strange that any random piece of concept art would be considered art, but if you advance that image and combine it with many others, and other art forms, that questions arise.