Not like this, Warren. If you say it's true then it's true but don't play this bullshit game it just makes you look dirty.
Which again, makes it seem more desperate that it's coming out now. Just bad vibes all around.It's actually more believable that fact they did know each other, less guard when you're around friends and you say more truthful things when on topics.
It's just absurdly illogical to get from 1 to 2.. not to mention Sanders' comments from the 80s about women running for president.what degree of irony do I need to level up to in order to believe that Sanders both:
1) famously encouraged Warren to run in 2016 against Clinton as a rebuke to her blatant deck-stacking in the primaries
and
2) discouraged Warren (apparently to the point of mockery or insult) from running in 2020 because he changed his mind and decided that women can't be president
None of the annonymous sources were in the room, theres no tape or video of the exchange and the alledged offender denied.
This is pretty much how you make a standard fabricated story.
Theres literally zero fact checking and they just decided to print it anyway.
Ah, we're back to "ITS A SMEEEAAAARRRR" against any negative story I see. It's not a "fabricated" story if he actually said it, or it was a telephone game version of a milder comment. The idea that "lying and making up stuff is ok, because obviously everyone else is doing it" is complete and total projection.It's fair game, considering it started as a fabricated story using anonymous sources. If CNN can make up a story, a regular staffer can debunk the same story. I don't know why CNN would get more credibility in this story compared to a bernie supporter.
The most "likely" reality is;
Sanders and Warren were having a discussion on running in 2020, the topic of Warren's gender and the difficulty of being a women and running for office came up and Sanders worded it in a way that dug at Warren or insulted her, or at worst was dismissive of her chances while still respecting she is "fit" for office.
It's why Warren told staffers about it right after it happened because it got to her and she was annoyed that he would present it that way, and now that she's down in the polls she fed it to some people to write about in the media because it was actually a thing she was miffed on.
Seems like he should have asked a male candidate to run against Clinton then if he was so sure a woman couldn't become presidentIt's actually more believable that fact they did know each other, less guard when you're around friends and you say more truthful things when on topics.
https://twitter.com/kristenorthman/status/1216879913078329344?s=21
elizabeth Warren responds. Thoughts?
https://twitter.com/kristenorthman/status/1216879913078329344?s=21
elizabeth Warren responds. Thoughts?
Hmm. That is pretty fair, you're right I guess, lol.just making the point that you were the closest thing political threads on here had to an unironic Biden supporter and you don't even support him
Hillary strikes again! Lol.The most likely reality is that one of the Hillary staffers now working for her ran this plan by her as a plausibly deniable way to "upset" Sanders for the debate and to plant in the mind of the public that Sanders is Supreme Misogyny Chairman of vermont.
And if he did actually say it? I'm going to vote for him in NY when the time comes, but this is the kinda thing I want to know about beforehand. It's easy to say the right thing in public. It's what you say when no one's looking that matters.I don't think this is an appropriate attack regardless of what he said. It's a full on low blow that signals desperation and anger. This isn't them winning on a positive campaign, it isn't even doing a fair critique on Bernie's policies, it's a gutter attack meant only to hurt Bernie's campaign. This also opens him up for trouble in the general should he win the primary. It's a dirty move imo.
First off we dont know the gender of any source so its weird to draw lines if gender here when warren herself still hasnt aaid anything regarding this.
Second, accusing her campaign of being cowardly and manipulation isnt saying she herself is either of those things (although both would be fair given she has yet to comment on the matter and has had ample time to do so).
If we want to talk about a history of supporting bad people we should probably also mention warren was a republican twenty years ago.
You dont need to tell us what it sounds like because this was a weak attempt on your part to try and act like the discourse here was sexist in nature and as such would have been properly called as such had you actually made that argument.
Pretty weak-ass response and still directly contradicts Sanders's rejection.
Warren's response seems actively irritated that this story leaked out.
Yup.Warren's response seems actively irritated that this story leaked out.
Save us the concern trolling. You were chomping at the bit for something like this
Maybe Warren's moved on from that moment and someone leaking that opened it up again and aired it out for all to see when she'd rather be focusing on more pressing matters.There's barely any context given about the conversation and now Warren doesn't want to talk about it anymore. She just wants to move on and let people fall something for clearly unsubstantiated for political benefit, especially when there is so much that proves the contrary
Women really like to be told what they can't do. especially liberal women.It really doesn't tell us anything outside of the context of the actual conversation. But I don't think anybody will change their mind about Bernie over this.
You have plenty of audio visual evidence of Bernie defending the possibilities of a woman winning the presidency. This is ultimately a me vs you. Bernie has the evidence to back up this is not a position he has held ever. Warren only has her word and her current position at polls.
People aren't dumb and will see through this. Her team fucked up.
Like I said in the other thread... I've met so many 'liberals' who legitimately think that "we need a white man to beat trump in 2020, sorry there are too many racists to take the risk."It'd be nice to have some context to what was said. Its shitty he said a woman couldn't win, idk why he would say that to her after begging her to run for 16 unless he felt Hilary was evidence it couldn't happen and if thats the case thats fucking stupid as fuck.
I really don't buy that he said this and I think the fact that she's doubling down when the truth is probably more along the lines of "it's going to be hard for a woman to win given the sexism in politics" is pretty lame. Bernie literally asked for her to run in 2016, he campaigned for Clinton hard in 2016, it's just patently untrue that he thought a woman couldn't be president by his own words and actions.