fuck having context for anything.Women really like to be told what they can't do. especially liberal women.
fuck having context for anything.Women really like to be told what they can't do. especially liberal women.
Women really like to be told what they can't do. especially liberal women.
Please tell me in what context it's OK for Bernie to say that to a Female Presidential Candidate's face?
it's very disappointingThought it would take until tomorrow. Didn't expect her to double down on to say Bernie was lying. It's pretty obvious this was the plan starting with the volunteer script leak.
It's pointless to speculate my feelings on it without knowing the content and context of what he said. What he's said in the past in relation to women running for president and the fact that he tried to get Warren to run in 2016 makes me think that what he actually said wasn't rooted in sexism. But we'll see I suppose.And if he did actually say it? I'm going to vote for him in NY when the time comes, but this is the kinda thing I want to know about beforehand. It's easy to say the right thing in public. It's what you say when no one's looking that matters.
Do I think it got garbled in the telling? Yeah, it probably did. Do I know Bernie's said some not great stuff over the years? Yeah, he definitely has. No one's perfect. Politicians especially. They all suck, it's just a matter of how much and what you can live with to advance your goals.
They don't actually want contextWhy is everyone asking for context?
What context do you need for "if a women was nominated she wouldn't win because she's a women"
rofl
Not buying this head cannon regarding someone who pushed for warren to run just last election (and only entered the race after she didn't)Like I said in the other thread... I've met so many 'liberals' who legitimately think that "we need a white man to beat trump in 2020, sorry there are too many racists to take the risk."
Then why didn't she release a statement before the news cycle ran this story without response from her?Maybe Warren's moved on from that moment and someone leaking that opened it up again and aired it out for all to see when she'd rather be focusing on more pressing matters.
Sanders will be asked again, and will deny (probably more aggressively) again. Warren refusing to back down from the central claim will continue to be an elephant in the room.
I don't see this really playing out in her favor.
That was before Trump won? That changed everything.Not buying this head cannon regarding someone who pushed for warren to run just last election (and only entered the race after she didn't)
Please tell me in what context it's OK for Bernie to say that to a Female Presidential Candidate's face?
If he denies it, he's calling her a liar.Sanders will be asked again, and will deny (probably more aggressively) again. Warren refusing to back down from the central claim will continue to be an elephant in the room. She had a chance to make it clear whether or not she was standing by the essential thrust of the story, and she fumbled that chance badly.
I don't see this really playing out in her favor.
Save us the inflammatory accusations.Save us the concern trolling. You were chomping at the bit for something like this
Sanders is the same guy who called black voters "low information" aka dumb and condescendingly wagged his finger at Hilary at debates. Why should he get the benefit of the doubt over Warren in this situation?
Why is everyone asking for context?
What context do you need for "if a women was nominated she wouldn't win because she's a women"
rofl
It doesn't make sense that he'd want to split off educated women voters from Clinton before consolidating them in 2016, but doesn't have that same issue this go around? And the timeline is well different.Not buying this head cannon regarding someone who pushed for warren to run just last election (and only entered the race after she didn't)
Bernie would've (rightly, in your estimation) told Obama not to run in 2008 because a black man can't win either, then?
Yeah, I'm guessing someone that worked for her was trying to start shit, remembered they heard Warren say something years ago and leaked it, even though Warren likely said, "This is just between us, don't' tell this to anybody else.". If I was Warren, I'd be pissed. It's like, "Goddammit, why'd y'all have to do that, now? You know how the people are going to react to this?! I bet you they are going to start taking sides and try to eat each other alive like if they were trapped in that grocery store from The Mist!"...So we're just not getting any context for what exactly he actually said....oh boy.
My guess is staffers desperately threw that out there so the media could eat it up and of course Warren isnt going to elaborate further on private conversations....
People are just going to move to their corners without any further info. Sounds like a slow news day to me
Even then not really because hilary got 2 million + more votes.
Come again?It doesn't make sense that he'd want to split off educated women voters from Clinton before consolidating them in 2016, but doesn't have that same issue this go around?
YupWarren's response seems actively irritated that this story leaked out.
......he wasn't going to run in 2016 if Warren didIt doesn't make sense that he'd want to split off educated women voters from Clinton before consolidating them in 2016, but doesn't have that same issue this go around?
I really don't buy that he said this and I think the fact that she's doubling down when the truth is probably more along the lines of "it's going to be hard for a woman to win given the sexism in politics" is pretty lame. Bernie literally asked for her to run in 2016, he campaigned for Clinton hard in 2016, it's just patently untrue that he thought a woman couldn't be president by his own words and actions.
I mean, that's part of the liberal bedwetting... that only a white man can win the electoral college from Trump, because of rural states.Even then not really because hilary got 2 million + more votes.
I don't think it's going to work.If he denies it, he's calling her a liar.
If he admits it, he's going to reinforce a lot of negative opinions on him.
There is no good play for him here, and he is not going to come out the winner in this.
I think you can absolutely have a conversation about a shitty American mindset against women, that maybe broadly sexism is so ingrained someone could think we aren't there yet and lament that fact. However, I don't want to think based on nothing that Warren is going to deliberately hide that context.Please tell me in what context it's OK for Bernie to say that to a Female Presidential Candidate's face?
I have no fucking idea, guy. It's frustrating that this is all she has to say about it. Not sure why you're so content w/ having so little informationPlease tell me in what context it's OK for Bernie to say that to a Female Presidential Candidate's face?
pretty muchEveryone: "I don't believe it but I'll wait for Warren to reply"
After Warren says it's what he said
"Ok I still don't believe it because it's not what Sanders said!"
I mean, Bernie is a man who doesn't stop fighting for something just because he believe it's impossible in the short term.
That's, i think, a major point of why so many of us really admire him.
Warren wants them to do this.Also, if you don't think CNN won't ask about this exact issue, REPEATEDLY. And RE-VISIT IT IN THE FUTURE, you're out of your goddammn mind.
You could just believe her, you know.Great, so she didn't explain any of the context and effectively doubled down. Now we get to have fun with He said She said bullshit. Thanks Warren. Thanks for trying to derail the left with your campaign's last gasp smear tactic. I've lost a lot of respect for her today.
Him saying something on television is not in any way evidence of what he might say in private.