Jay Z put out TWO albums with him when it was common knowledge what r kelly has been doing. This is all very old news in the music industry. It's just that this documentary is shedding so much light on it now, YEARS after the fact
These apologies have really come a long way now, I still remember when the standard reply to media outrages was "sorry not sorry", then people started getting smarter and we started getting the "sorry but..." kind of apologies, and now we have really refined the art of the forced apology, we are now in the "sorry I did this subtle excuse here blah blah so sorry reinforce subtle excuse" what will these young kids come up with next.
I'm not really a fan of this "you must condemn this person" movement. Seems like bullying. I mean, if x doesn't explicitly condemn y, it doesn't mean x support y. Silence is not approval.
I'm not really a fan of this "you must condemn this person" movement. Seems like bullying. I mean, if x doesn't explicitly condemn y, it doesn't mean x support y. Silence is not approval.
(CNN)Lady Gaga once defended her 2013 collaboration with singer R. Kelly by pointing to the "bond" they shared over "very untrue things written about us."
It's not a non-issue that (Edit: Oops, abandoned this train of thought, then didn't delete this bit. Let's try again downstream in the thread.)Kendrick didn't need push back, it's a non issue. The first three artists Spotify went after we're predictably all Black abusers. If they were serious about pulling the music of abusers then they should have went scorched Earth on the 50s-80s rock scene for example, (them fucking junior high school age groupies was well known) pthat's why Kendrick threatened to boycott. You know they wouldn't have pulled Steven Tyler, Elvis, John Lennon, David Bowie etc... Etc... so they dropped their concern trolling about abusers.
Lady Gaga's voice sang a song about how the accusations re: R. Kelly were "very untrue." Nobody cares if you don't think that was hurting anyone.Disgusting is how you make the song seem like it was hurting anyone.
It's meaning was something Gaga was very vocal about in the media and for those that actually care it's worth looking up.
As for the allegations I find it all absolutely horrible.
Maybe it hit Gaga in the head more than some believe and honestly if a friend that I've trusted for years turned out to be everything that he's currently accused of..
I would take a few long days off from reality.
I'm not really a fan of this "you must condemn this person" movement. Seems like bullying. I mean, if x doesn't explicitly condemn y, it doesn't mean x support y. Silence is not approval.
Well so much for being a 'fucking hypocrite' as she has apologized and is taking down their song.It's about not being fucking hypocrite. If Gaga usually speaks about women and is considered an "ally" in this stuff, it's not difficult to see why she should explain this crap.
Also are we exclusively using threadmarks instead of updating OPs now? That's nonsense.
What did Kendrick do wrong? He's not defending R.Kelly, he threatened to pull his music over Spotify's racist behavior. I would have done the same.
I would've just been like:
"I fucked up. I worked with R.Kelly because despite being a shit person, he's extremely talented and has a huge fan base. I thought it would benefit my career during a dark time in my life. Considering what I stand for, it was extremely hypocritical of me to work with him (and Terry Richardson).
I didn't respond sooner because I was hoping it would all go away. Ultimately I was trying to protect myself, and it was cowardly.
I know it's too little too late, but I will be removing the song from all streaming platforms. If you no longer want to support me or my music, I understand.
Again, I fucked up, and I'm sorry."
Celebrities should hire you to write apologiesI would've just been like:
"I fucked up. I worked with R.Kelly because despite being a shit person, he's extremely talented and has a huge fan base. I thought it would benefit my career during a dark time in my life. Considering what I stand for, it was extremely hypocritical of me to work with him (and Terry Richardson).
I didn't respond sooner because I was hoping it would all go away. Ultimately I was trying to protect myself, and it was cowardly.
I know it's too little too late, but I will be removing the song from all streaming platforms. If you no longer want to support me or my music, I understand.
Again, I fucked up, and I'm sorry."
If you're expecting apologies like that from any celeb that has worked with R Kelly you will be waiting a long ass time. They don't havebe to grovel to a fanbase that's not going anywhere. They just have to offer a apology they are comfortable giving. She didn't have to open up the way she did in that apology. Especially a forced one.I would've just been like:
"I fucked up. I worked with R.Kelly because despite being a shit person, he's extremely talented and has a huge fan base. I thought it would benefit my career during a dark time in my life. Considering what I stand for, it was extremely hypocritical of me to work with him (and Terry Richardson).
I didn't respond sooner because I was hoping it would all go away. Ultimately I was trying to protect myself, and it was cowardly.
I know it's too little too late, but I will be removing the song from all streaming platforms. If you no longer want to support me or my music, I understand.
Again, I fucked up, and I'm sorry."
This is the one time where I actually say in earnest -- BOTH SIDES! It was a bad look on Kendrick's part to go so hard in defense of XXXTentacion and R. Kelly - and yes, trying to prevent those two coming to harm commercially is defending them.What did Kendrick do wrong? He's not defending R.Kelly, he threatened to pull his music over Spotify's racist behavior. I would have done the same.
Well at least something good came out of this mess!
I would've just been like:
"I fucked up. I worked with R.Kelly because despite being a shit person, he's extremely talented and has a huge fan base. I thought it would benefit my career during a dark time in my life. Considering what I stand for, it was extremely hypocritical of me to work with him (and Terry Richardson).
I didn't respond sooner because I was hoping it would all go away. Ultimately I was trying to protect myself, and it was cowardly.
I know it's too little too late, but I will be removing the song from all streaming platforms. If you no longer want to support me or my music, I understand.
Again, I fucked up, and I'm sorry."
Where is the thresdmark icons??
AgreedGood response by Gaga, if anyone wants to still be upset about that, then you'll never be satisfied.
You do realize jay-z made the album with him before the fall out right?Jay Z only put out 2 albums with R. Kelly to avoid a lawsuit stemming from the summer tour they were on together. Basically they had a tiff while on tour and R. Kelly filed a suit for money and said he was being threatened by Jay Z's entourage both backstage and from the crowd. Jay Z offered him a chance to make an album together where they can avoid any lawsuit and make money off of it and it convinced R. Kelly to drop the suit and work together.
I'm not really sure where this 'I desperately needed R Kelly's fanbase' narrative is coming from but Gaga's popularity and fanbase was several times (and I'm talking double figures) bigger than what was left of him.
In fact their song together is R Kelly's biggest song SINCE then.
I agree about everything else.
I would've just been like:
"I fucked up. I worked with R.Kelly because despite being a shit person, he's extremely talented and has a huge fan base. I thought it would benefit my career during a dark time in my life. Considering what I stand for, it was extremely hypocritical of me to work with him (and Terry Richardson).
I didn't respond sooner because I was hoping it would all go away. Ultimately I was trying to protect myself, and it was cowardly.
I know it's too little too late, but I will be removing the song from all streaming platforms. If you no longer want to support me or my music, I understand.
Again, I fucked up, and I'm sorry."
Lower right corner, right above the space where you type your reply.
The albums came first, then the tour. Jay-Z is lame. All of NYC knew about RKelly falsifying the marriage certificate and marrying Aaliyah because Hot 97 mentioned it at the time. Jay was in the industry so he definitely knew. Further Aaliyah and him dated briefly before she dated Dame Dash. That dummy knew and still worked with his ex's abuser. Dame is also on the radio now saying Jay tried to steal her from him after they started dating. Ffwd to recent years and that fuckboi gets his ass kicked by Solange Knowles for cheating with Dame Dash's ex-wife. Jay is a lame dude with issues, still Top 5-10 though.Jay Z only put out 2 albums with R. Kelly to avoid a lawsuit stemming from the summer tour they were on together. Basically they had a tiff while on tour and R. Kelly filed a suit for money and said he was being threatened by Jay Z's entourage both backstage and from the crowd. Jay Z offered him a chance to make an album together where they can avoid any lawsuit and make money off of it and it convinced R. Kelly to drop the suit and work together.
it's gone from Apple Music now too.
Yeah, it's just been frustrating to follow. Couldn't understand how this didn't happen after the BBC doco, but heres to hoping he's now held accountableUnless you're into the music scene he's in there are bigger fish to worry about. It's not that people don't care it's that he's under the radar so he doesn't get bought up. He's not Kanye. Normal people can only do so much, all we can do is have a conversation - this is where law enforcement needs to step in. R. Kelly isn't unique in the music business, and many things they do are unknown to the public or aren't widely known. This is why the documentary was necessary to put the spotlight on him again.
Yeah, it's just been frustrating to follow. Couldn't understand how this didn't happen after the BBC doco, but heres to hoping he's now held accountable