Its been confirmed today you can also play local co-op on one Switch.
Cheers.
Its been confirmed today you can also play local co-op on one Switch.
So they are going to give Mario maker 2 a lower score than Mario maker 1 because it's online isn't 100% complete even though Mario maker 1 had no online play at all?Really hope this is taken into cnsideration in the reviews. It was pretty irritating that ultimate's scores didn't get to reflect how the online is all jacked up
No, but it wouldn't be unprecedented to dock a few percentage points from the overall package for omitting an obvious mode.So they are going to give Mario maker 2 a lower score than Mario maker 1 because it's online isn't 100% complete even though Mario maker 1 had no online play at all?
No they should give it a lower score because it requires paid online subscription to have access to functionality that is a big hook of this game, which other games of this genre don't require, and on top of that dropping the ball with the paid online functionality aspects.So they are going to give Mario maker 2 a lower score than Mario maker 1 because it's online isn't 100% complete even though Mario maker 1 had no online play at all?
Did they lower the scores of Mario maker 1 since it had no online play at all?
I mean I was only getting it to play online with my friend.This is so disingenuous. You know very well that the number of people specifically buying Mario Maker 2 for this just announced online mode is absolutely minimal. Yep, it's a stupid design decision. But "cancelled my pre-order!!!" children on the internet totally undermine any sort of serious discussion about it.
My nephews moved from Ohio to NY and this would've been a way for us to game together from a distance. Nintendo just lost two copies as that was the only reason I had to buy the games for us.For real, usually people are being hyperbolic, but there's nothing hyperbolic about being mad about this. This is truly ridiculous and I too have friends who are now passing on it. I'm still getting it because I'd have got it even if it didn't have any online multiplayer, but I am bummed about it.
You not caring means fuck all to those of actually do. Laugh it up.The only online multiplayer(if you can call it that) I care about on this game is being able to share levels and play other people's creations, personally I don't care about the online multiplayer on levels, I'll just say it's a shame it's limited to random people. Although gotta love the hypocrisy of people being outraged for a feature they just learned about two weeks ago not being what they hoped for and now it's a dealbreaker, they weren't going to buy the game anyway.
This is one of those threads on ResetEra that makes me think I'm on Reddit or 4chan. But carry on, at least it's hillarious to read, the ones hoping for the game to fail because of this, you're the ones stealing the show, heh.
Yeah you can stick your symphathy up your ass, but at least you tried.
I mean I was only getting it to play online with my friend.
I didn't care about mario maker 2 before the online announcement (often saying I would only get it if it had online play with my friends) but after I was game to get it.
my friend also cancelled his preorder because the only reason he was getting it was to play with me.
most of my other friends are still getting it though *shrugs*
You not caring means fuck all to those of actually do. Laugh it up.
This is so disingenuous. You know very well that the number of people specifically buying Mario Maker 2 for this just announced online mode is absolutely minimal. Yep, it's a stupid design decision. But "cancelled my pre-order!!!" children on the internet totally undermine any sort of serious discussion about it.
It is entertaining to see the rabid ones with the defense of "you didn't know about this feature before 2 weeks ago"
Doing poorly a new mode is not the same as making a spin off no one asked for after years waiting for a new entry. Also Fed Force initial trailer was terrible and confusing.It's funny when you compare this to something like Metroid Prime Federation Force, where people were practically forming mobs. Shows how different fans' priorities can be.
They dedicated a chunk of the direct to this feature because they knew how much buzz "online mario maker" would create. That was a huge part of the excitement coming out of that direct.
Spoiler alert it won't, Nintendo won't even respond to this they are always the same in this cases they just shamelessly ignore complaints and move on.Hopefully ppl are tweeting at Nintendo or raising a fuss so this gets corrected via a patch
wrong. Nintendo being this stupid angered me and caused me my productivity today :Pok but really, you're a tiny minority because this feature was only announced two weeks ago. So like, if you decided you wanted a game and then decided you didn't want that game anymore within two weeks- cool, you didn't waste much time on it. No damage done. Ultimately, it has basically no impact at all on your life.
You could be right. I can't think of any time they changed something due to a petition.Spoiler alert they won't, they won't even respond to this Nintendo are always the same in this cases they just shamelessly ignore complaints and move on.
This isn't entirely true.Spoiler alert it won't, Nintendo won't even respond to this they are always the same in this cases they just shamelessly ignore complaints and move on.
Good. This isn't a Mario Maker 2 problem only. This is an overall issue among Nintendo.Twitter is shitting on Nintendo something serious right now.
Deserved.
I hope they do but if Smash, Super Mario Party and NSO (the most recent examples i can think of) are any indications they won't.
wrong. Nintendo being this stupid angered me and caused me my productivity today :P
I get it, it's not important to you, but please don't try to act like it's a trivial amount of people that are upset by this. Plenty of people have fond memories of playing mario with their friends while growing up and no longer live near their friends :/
But can twitter change Nintendo?Twitter is shitting on Nintendo something serious right now.
Deserved.
No it wasn't? It was just one feature mentioned amongst many. The main thing mentioned on twitter, reddit, game sites etc was the 3D World mode, and all the new course building options, seeing as that's the actual point of the game.
I don't care that much about the literal numbers, I won't presume that reviews have all the much power over the company's decisions in the future but it's important for informing players and otherwise making some noise on the matterWhy are review scores important other than console war bullshit?
I definitely agree. Smash was just a really irritating experience, I know a few articles came out in the aftermath but it's not quite the same as players and press being fully informed going inReview Scores being slightly lower isn't going to be any effective honestly.
The game is still content rich. And I'm seeing people not really scoring much lower over this. People just gotta make some noise, but respectfully. Launching insults isn't the best way about it.
Hopfully it changes
Don't be a silly goose. Game sequels have higher expectations placed on them than their predecessors, the impetus is on them for improving with each iteration. The og mario maker was trying something new so it's sort of okay that its online wasn't up to snuffSo they are going to give Mario maker 2 a lower score than Mario maker 1 because it's online isn't 100% complete even though Mario maker 1 had no online play at all?
Did they lower the scores of Mario maker 1 since it had no online play at all?
Alright friend you got this. I'm sure limiting online play to randoms will go over well in 2019 because 3D World assets are in building mode. We'll all regale our friends of incredible creations that they too can experience on their own, in this game that clearly has online MP but doesn't allow invites or private lobbies because leaderboards.
🙌
For fucks sake. Why are people in this thread actual children? I'm not saying this is a good choice by Nintendo, I'm just saying that people acting like Nintendo took away something they'd longed for all their life and now all gamerzz are going to rise up in revenge need to get a fucking grip.
I want to actually talk about the issue at hand and not wade through pages of faux-emotion about a recently announced secondary online component of a video game.
Honestly it's not clear what you are trying to do in this thread or what you want to discuss other than to tell people how they should feel. Beyond that, it's quite likely that many buyers/potential buyers were assuming/expecting/hoping for this feature long before the recent direct. Perhaps many were already unhappy that it wasn't in the first, and wanted it in the second. The whole "it was announced two weeks ago" angle doesn't really mean anything.For fucks sake. Why are people in this thread actual children? I'm not saying this is a good choice by Nintendo, I'm just saying that people acting like Nintendo took away something they'd longed for all their life and now all gamerzz are going to rise up in revenge need to get a fucking grip.
I want to actually talk about the issue at hand and not wade through pages of faux-emotion about a recently announced secondary online component of a video game.
Yeah it's pretty nuts. I really hope they reassess this decisionTwitter is shitting on Nintendo something serious right now.
Deserved.
Then talk about it then? Maybe without insults and handwaving concerns.
it's quite likely that many buyers/potential buyers were assuming/expecting/hoping for this feature long before the recent direct. Perhaps many were already unhappy that it wasn't in the first, and wanted it in the second. The whole "it was announced two weeks ago" angle doesn't really mean anything.
They're probably in the "how do we fix this pr fuckup" room as we speakYeah it's pretty nuts. I really hope they reassess this decision