Same guy recently appointed the former Rebel Media director to run the 2019 Conservative campaign.
Get ready for a Fox/Trump style antics in Canada.
CPC could win it if the Libs and NDP split a lot of ridings.
The new NDP leader is pretty likable.
At this rate. the CPC could become 3rd party by next election. Delicious.
Lmfao at Scheer thinking this concern trolling will win him an election.
So a creationist is a lock for the minister of science position again if the Cons take government?
Dude. Rob Ford was like a beta version of Donald Trump.Yeah, sorry, there's not as much of an appetite for that here as there is in the US. I do expect an increase in the right-wing version of virtue signalling (if not outright dog-whistling), but the audience for it isn't broad enough for things to become a completely alt-right shitshow, though I'm sure that it would go that way if it honestly won them points.
Scheer is clearly concern trolling. However, the Governor General should not have said what she said. I do not appreciate politicians bringing their religious beliefs into their public speeches. Whether it is American politicians constantly saying "god bless" or our Governor General saying what she said. Both violate the separation of church and state, imo.
I agree with everything else that she said, even though it's not that relevant in Canada.
Lmfao at Scheer thinking this concern trolling will win him an election.
This is the part that I take issue with:Science and atheism aren't a religion. People can believe in fairy tales, but the reality is that evolution is real. If anything her saying this would be more of a credence to keeping religion and the government separated, even though that is not in our constitution.
She stated her religious belief here when she talks about divine intervention. She cannot scientifically prove that life and the universe weren't created by a higher power (btw, I am not talking about evolution which is scientifically proven). She is free to believe that though, just like I am free to believe otherwise. What I take issue with is government officials taking a position, one or the other, while they are representing the country."And we are still debating and still questioning whether life was a divine intervention or whether it was coming out of a natural process let alone, oh my goodness, a random process."
This is the part that I take issue with:
She stated her religious belief here when she talks about divine intervention. She cannot scientifically prove that life and the universe weren't created by a higher power (btw, I am not talking about evolution which is scientifically proven). She is free to believe that though, just like I am free to believe otherwise. What I take issue with is government officials taking a position, one or the other, while they are representing the country.
I have seen people argue about whether or not atheism is a belief or lack thereof and I do not want to go down that rabbit hole. I do not know if the Governor General is atheist or not. I only know what she believes based off of the quoted comment.
Maybe her comments were directed specifically towards evolution but it is hard for me to tell with the wording.
This is the part that I take issue with:
She stated her religious belief here when she talks about divine intervention. She cannot scientifically prove that life and the universe weren't created by a higher power (btw, I am not talking about evolution which is scientifically proven). She is free to believe that though, just like I am free to believe otherwise. What I take issue with is government officials taking a position, one or the other, while they are representing the country.
I have seen people argue about whether or not atheism is a belief or lack thereof and I do not want to go down that rabbit hole. I do not know if the Governor General is atheist or not. I only know what she believes based off of the quoted comment.
Maybe her comments were directed specifically towards evolution but it is hard for me to tell with the wording.
I think you're right and Scheer might have a point if he was concerned at all over what the GG said, but instead he attacks the PM for the most vague of compliments. The line about them just redirecting to Trudeau when asked if the GG should apologize just speaks volumes.
I posted that I know he's concern trolling on the last page. I already know that Scheer is a clown who fakes outrage at everything.This is why people are saying he was concern trolling. He wants to give the impression that she is taking a side and that nobody should express belief or lack thereof while holding public office. There is doubt as to whether he actually believes in a church and state like separation extending all the way to even atheism and he's just using this as a chance to attack liberals.
I see where he is coming from, but when it comes to policy--decisions should be influenced by evidence and observable facts. Expression of an atheistic position here is not nearly as cut and dry as scheer is trying to make it seem as he--like the rest of us are not privy to the personal beliefs of the Gov gen.
CPC could win it if the Libs and NDP split a lot of ridings.
The new NDP leader is pretty likable.
This is the part that I take issue with:
She stated her religious belief here when she talks about divine intervention. She cannot scientifically prove that life and the universe weren't created by a higher power (btw, I am not talking about evolution which is scientifically proven). She is free to believe that though, just like I am free to believe otherwise. What I take issue with is government officials taking a position, one or the other, while they are representing the country.
I have seen people argue about whether or not atheism is a belief or lack thereof and I do not want to go down that rabbit hole. I do not know if the Governor General is atheist or not. I only know what she believes based off of the quoted comment.
Maybe her comments were directed specifically towards evolution but it is hard for me to tell with the wording.
Staying silent will probably not do him any favors either. Maybe I'm just cynical, but I think all a lot of quebecois voters will need to do is look at him and they'll make up their minds. They're trying to create a very secular province and a man holding public office while wearing religious symbols shows up to convince them to vote for his party. It just wouldn't gel. Even if Singh did say anything, I would imagine scheer would fire back with "what are you talking about? you're a man of faith aren't you? why are you defending someone making fun of your beliefs and abusing their power as a public servant with a powerful platform...?!"I posted that I know he's concern trolling on the last page. I already know that Scheer is a clown who fakes outrage at everything.
What I find interesting, however, is the NDP's silence. This is the kind of red meat that Mulcair loved back when he was leader. I suppose Singh is (rightfully) worried about Quebec. Also, it wasn't even Trudeau's comments anyway so this can't really be used to prove that he's a secret Tory at heart. It wouldn't have stopped Mulcair though.
CPC could win it if the Libs and NDP split a lot of ridings.
The new NDP leader is pretty likable.
They're close enough that I'd rather one or the other as opposed to the Cons. Neither one of those parties are as anti-science, anti-immigrants, pro religion, pro gutting the protective measures in place for our natural environment, as the conservatives.I wouldn't call it vote splitting. The parties are fundamentally different in every aspect.
They're close enough that I'd rather one or the other as opposed to the Cons. Neither one of those parties are as anti-science, anti-immigrants, pro religion, pro gutting the protective measures in place for our natural environment, as the conservatives.
I wouldn't call it vote splitting. The parties are fundamentally different in every aspect.
Social issues are also economic issues. I understand that Chretien era liberals were cuts happy, and did a number on social services and what not. But Trudeau pitched a more progressive platform than Mulcair did during the last election.Economic issues are arguably the most important issues to most voters. Liberals voters would probably align more with the conservatives if it came down entirely to economics.
Its been called "vote splitting" since the beginning of time, despite the fact that every person I know who votes NDP would never vote for the Liberals in a million years.
the lack of a belief in a god/creator it's not a religious belief or a theory. Science operates under the assumption that there isn't, until proven otherwiseScheer is clearly concern trolling. However, the Governor General should not have said what she said. I do not appreciate politicians bringing their religious beliefs into their public speeches. Whether it is American politicians constantly saying "god bless" or our Governor General saying what she said. Both violate the separation of church and state, imo.
I agree with everything else that she said, even though it's not that relevant in Canada.
I would and I did. The CPC is a bigger threat to destroying what I believe Canada is and represents, than anything the Liberals could ever hope to do.
Gotta stick to your principles and some times that means voting for the other guy.
Or not voting at all, as most of my NDP voting friends decided was the best course of action.
I, too, voted for the Liberals. I don't think I will again next election.
Anecdotes are anecdotes. I know plenty of NDP voters who'd vote Liberal if it were strategically sound, myself included.Its been called "vote splitting" since the beginning of time, despite the fact that every person I know who votes NDP would never vote for the Liberals in a million years.
With Jagmeet's popularity and socially left Canadians disillusioned with Trudeau, you migjt see that happen if Jagmeet secures the far left and punjabi/indo-canadian vote, coupled stragglers from Trudeau who knows. Trudeaus positions will be a lot centrist and right of Jagmeet on things.
Staying silent will probably not do him any favors either. Maybe I'm just cynical, but I think all a lot of quebecois voters will need to do is look at him and they'll make up their minds. They're trying to create a very secular province and a man holding public office while wearing religious symbols shows up to convince them to vote for his party. It just wouldn't gel. Even if Singh did say anything, I would imagine scheer would fire back with "what are you talking about? you're a man of faith aren't you? why are you defending someone making fun of your beliefs and abusing their power as a public servant with a powerful platform...?!"
I love the right wing tactic of concern trolling shit in the context X will hurt minorities and women.
The thing with jagmeet, despite any good ideas he had, as likeable as he is to people, there are way way way too many people in the country that won't vote for him because he has a funny sounding name, he's brown and/or idiots confuse Sikhs with Muslims and still won't vote for that (which I'm itself is a whole nother problem). And while yes, the majority of those people are conservatives, believe it or not, there are people that are left wing progressives that think that way.
The world is racists. And he's not going to get a fair shake.