What happened to the person who falsely accused him?
I "love" when autistic men use their autism as a shield and people defend them while if you're an autistic woman/nb and make a little mistake people shit themselves. He definitely knew better, given what he said. And just letting people call him slurs in defense of him? How fuckin pathetic.
People, including myself get treated unfairly because of the social stigma, one which this guy is absolutely not helping by using it as an end all excuse for this kind of behavior.
About that plane ticket being provided by AGDQ some of you thought might happen if he did cancel her return ticket: she wasn't registered, tried to get in with last year's badge on 01/07, and has been banned until 2020. So I'm not sure if they'd be quick to help a non-attendee. So if this asshole guy would cancel her ticket, she'll need to have her own cash or hope people there can help her. 😔
https://mobile.twitter.com/Mari_mba_/status/1082491436493344768
Wait, wth, she went through all this and didn't even get a proper badge for the event?
It's actually a bit more common than you think. There are a number of people who do actually go even if they don't get to register, just to hang out with runners/the community who is there. It fills up so fast these days that sometimes you go just for the hanging out stuff. It's not actually that fun sitting in the streaming room the entire day (although the side rooms have lots of cool/interesting stuff happening that you also have to have your badge for). Also, she had agreed to meet up with this guy before he showed his true colours, and he paid her way so she didn't really have anything to lose by going and just hanging out and meeting fellow speedrunners.Wait, wth, she went through all this and didn't even get a proper badge for the event?
I've seen this a few times in this thread and it's really tiresome. We have no idea that they didn't get proof. He's all over twitter blasting us with piss but she's remained quiet. For all we know there was proof, and they have it. Regardless, how he's acted since is 100% worth a ban from the events. Transphobia, for example, is a one-way ticket to a permaban.If he didn't cancel her plane ticket, seems shitty to ban him from the event just based on her word with the evidence he's provided. I can see suspending him from it while they investigate, but a permanent ban is funny.
https://tn.com.ar/sociedad/un-joven-se-suicido-despues-de-que-lo-acusaron-falsamente-de-abuso_928082
Use google translate if you care to read it (spanish to english). He was 18 years old when he commited suicide this past december because he was falsely accused of raping a female friend on instagram. Ironically, a few days before her son's passing, her mother was very actively harassing (actual verbal harassment) facebook users that were against branding people as sexual harassers without evidence. I don't think I need to tell you what she thinks about the whole thing now.
It's not worth it dude. He's wisely decided to peace out on this thread, but is currently PMing me trying to justify why demanding someone share a bed with you isn't sexual harassment. I know we shouldn't backseat mod, but damn.So he has a right to kick her out of the room because he "felt unconfortable" that she didn't agree to play teddy bear with an obvious creep to "help him with his insomnia"? If you're going to ignore the power dynamics here, you might as well condone sexual harassment wholesale. "Hey, she might be my employee, but I didn't force her to have sex with me; I just felt unconfortable to work with someone I can't fuck, so I fired her".
1) A benefit you don't seem to be extending to both parties.
2) Extending the benefit of the doubt to this dude stopped being "reasonable" the second he posted that entire conversation on Twitter.
It's not worth it dude. He's wisely decided to peace out on this thread, but is currently PMing me trying to justify why demanding someone share a bed with you isn't sexual harassment. I know we shouldn't backseat mod, but damn.
Even in the case you mentioned I'd argue it had more to do with the victims mental health and this false narrative that men's lives are destroyed through false accusations
Report the pmsIt's not worth it dude. He's wisely decided to peace out on this thread, but is currently PMing me trying to justify why demanding someone share a bed with you isn't sexual harassment. I know we shouldn't backseat mod, but damn.
Report his PMs.It's not worth it dude. He's wisely decided to peace out on this thread, but is currently PMing me trying to justify why demanding someone share a bed with you isn't sexual harassment. I know we shouldn't backseat mod, but damn.
The guy has been even more of a creep and isn't backing down. His current narrative is that he's autistic, tomorrow he'll be something else.
The issue is how completely unrelated and inapplicable that cherry picked example is. There's no need to victim blame the victim in that case, in turn. Indeed, there's no need to adress it at all, because it has nothing to do with the case discussed in this thread.
It's not worth it dude. He's wisely decided to peace out on this thread, but is currently PMing me trying to justify why demanding someone share a bed with you isn't sexual harassment. I know we shouldn't backseat mod, but damn.
I mentioned the narrative of false accusations ruining people lives because I was signposting the idea that believing in that narrative can be harmful to the vulnerable people who find themselves in that situation and that people should be more understanding of mental illness as depression was listed in the article to someone who's main takeaway was that the case was all about the false accusation alone. I'd never dream of suggesting that he was in that situation because of any decisions he made; that was clearly all on her.
Ah, that's OK. As someone who struggled with depression (and friends with people in that situation too) I've had more than my share of "blaming the depressive person", so I probably overreacted. :)
Well he keeps digging that hole, it's getting deep. Likely too deep to climb back from.Yeah, this guy can get fucked into the ground forever and ever
Ok there are way more layers to this story. Seriously fuck this guy.
There's several posts with pics in the thread, but it seems like the whole thing from the beginning was a setup by him to get her banned.
Ok there are way more layers to this story. Seriously fuck this guy.
There's several posts with pics in the thread, but it seems like the whole thing from the beginning was a setup by him to get her banned.
Actually this might be a better starting point
I was looking at the replies in cdgexe's thing and one guy said he had more info and not to believe his shit.
I went to his twitter where he linked to her stuff.
Looking at her post history looks like she and cdgexe might've been together at one point
Ok there are way more layers to this story. Seriously fuck this guy.
There's several posts with pics in the thread, but it seems like the whole thing from the beginning was a setup by him to get her banned.
Actually this might be a better starting point
I was looking at the replies in cdgexe's thing and one guy said he had more info and not to believe his shit.
I went to his twitter where he linked to her stuff.
Looking at her post history looks like she and cdgexe might've been together at one point
Added it to the OP. Thanks and man this guy is a manipulative piece of shitMazzle May wanna add this to the OP since it really changes the story he's been bullshitting.
Ok there are way more layers to this story. Seriously fuck this guy.
There's several posts with pics in the thread, but it seems like the whole thing from the beginning was a setup by him to get her banned.
actually twitter suspended it.
Actually this might be a better starting point
I was looking at the replies in cdgexe's thing and one guy said he had more info and not to believe his shit.
I went to his twitter where he linked to her stuff.
Looking at her post history looks like she and cdgexe might've been together at one point
Actually this might be a better starting point
I was looking at the replies in cdgexe's thing and one guy said he had more info and not to believe his shit.
I went to his twitter where he linked to her stuff.
Looking at her post history looks like she and cdgexe might've been together at one point
I would have just suspended the dude until all information came to light. Permanently banning someone immediately on innuendo is such a scorched Earth approach. Whoever's running Games Done Quick should get into politics - he'd be right at home at the DNC or RNC.
I would have just suspended the dude until all information came to light. Permanently banning someone immediately on innuendo is such a scorched Earth approach. Whoever's running Games Done Quick should get into politics - he'd be right at home at the DNC or RNC.
It's like starting from the tip of the iceberg and descending to see the rest. Only instead of an iceberg, it's an endless pile of shit.well this certainly went from disgusting to... more disgusting.
*And yet another anime avatar*I would have just suspended the dude until all information came to light. Permanently banning someone immediately on innuendo is such a scorched Earth approach. Whoever's running Games Done Quick should get into politics - he'd be right at home at the DNC or RNC.
Great Timing dudeI would have just suspended the dude until all information came to light. Permanently banning someone immediately on innuendo is such a scorched Earth approach. Whoever's running Games Done Quick should get into politics - he'd be right at home at the DNC or RNC.
.
It could have gone the other way - hence why a suspension is fine until absolutely sure permanent banning is necessary.
Or, they got all the evidence right away. GDQ isn't obligated to any 3rd party, to inform them about this stuffIt could have gone the other way - hence why a suspension is fine until absolutely sure permanent banning is necessary.
Might want to clean up your language, pig. I'm not really interested in sifting through tweets collated by some Internet detectives - this is a matter for AGDQ to investigate and I hope some people can respect that.
It could have gone the other way - hence why a suspension is fine until absolutely sure permanent banning is necessary.
I would have just suspended the dude until all information came to light. Permanently banning someone immediately on innuendo is such a scorched Earth approach. Whoever's running Games Done Quick should get into politics - he'd be right at home at the DNC or RNC.
Might want to clean up your language, pig. I'm not really interested in sifting through tweets collated by some Internet detectives - this is a matter for AGDQ to investigate and I hope some people can respect that.