-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Crackdown 3 Won't Let You Play Wrecking Zone With Friends At Launch (Update - Will be part of Post-Launch Support with other DLC)
- Thread starter Deleted member 249
- Start date
How do you not know that the campaign is the main point of the game ?
I guess you could say the multiplayer components are...up in the clouds.
*Puts on sunglasses*
YEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHHHH
*Puts on sunglasses*
YEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHHHH
I'm so sorry
Lol. To be fair though, Smash at least has shitty online vs. multiplayer
instead of none.
The campaign is the main point of The Last of Us, but even that had the ability to group up with friends in multiplayer.
Dude what? That's the kind of feature oversight that is going to overwhelmingly taint the word of mouth for this game's launch. I don't understand how that happens.
I mean this was something that we figured would be day 1 at launch in some form at least. Wrecking Zone shared destructibility portion must be in worse shape than anticipated if this is really true. I'm just puzzled a bit at that R&D time spent on this and the current results I'm seeing in new gameplay gifs/videos.
I know you are joking, but the game has two separate achievement lists. One for singleplayer and one for multiplayer.
And of course there are cloud saves.
OP
OP
So i guess I have some questions to see if I should even get excited for this anymore. Do you get to create or pick from several characters like in Crackdown 1 and do their appearances change as you level up?
Example
Do agency vehicles also change as you levelup?
Example
Do agency vehicles also change as you levelup?
A reason would be nice.
Like, for example Titanfall was doing Azure for all the AI and it launched with groups, so I imagine it might simply be a design choice to discourage stomping or there simply is a bigger problem with matchmaking.
Like, for example Titanfall was doing Azure for all the AI and it launched with groups, so I imagine it might simply be a design choice to discourage stomping or there simply is a bigger problem with matchmaking.
Wait.. in this the person we're seeing isn't using lock on? Or do you mean the opponent?
Those red lines are nerve wrecking in-game. Really enjoyable.
I don't know how to define if something is two gens apart from something. I do know that it's all in the cloud and doesn't impact my performance on PC. According to Microsoft it's the power of 12 Xbox One's.
Even then, people acting like the multiplayer of this game isn't important are being disingenuous as fuck. That mode is the only one with full destruction, a very high priority with the devs and one of the main selling points of the game.
It is one generation apart, Crackdown 3's entire map is destructible, and it is synchronized online to a dozen players.
The person shooting at the main guy. I get why the game needs it because movement is so fast though.
HUH? Titanfall has tonnes of mobility and speed and does not need a lock on.
As a PC gamer I was really skeptical of the lock on mechanic. I thought it would remove all skill requirements and would make it too casual. But thanks to the great movement and the destruction elements you focus on completely different things during combat. It's more about choosing the high ground, removing lines of sight and evading the red lines. It was quite an enjoyable experience for me.
OP
OP
You mean the mp with the fabled cloud based destruction talked up since the announcement? The only mode with said destruction? That mode? Is suddenly not important anymore?
People on damage control crack me up.
I legit laughed out loud at the "How do you know campaign is not the main mode" I mean this is the game they ushered in the "Cloud" meme.
What does that have to do with the wider point? There is no reason a lock on is needed.
I think there is a reason Microsoft kept silent about it since 2015. We hadn't heard anything about the multiplayer mode for 3 years. Meanwhile we had seen campaign footage at two E3's.
Microsoft didn't promote the multiplayer at all in my opinion. Complete silence about it from Gamescom 2015 to X018 in.. 2018. With Epic buying Cloudgine and stories that the mode was only working as expected one year ago, so they could start building the game mode in 2017. Tells me everything.
When I tested the game this weekend I was surprised with the lack of bugs. I expected buildings flying through the air, terrible lag and other problems. But none of that.
Easy..multiplayer isnt the point of the game....and even if it was you can play multiplayer....
Thank you for letting us know what the point of the game is. It's always nice being told what part of the game I can safely ignore.
There are many things you can go out and defend about this game if you do choose, this not having this simple feature damn sure shouldn't be one of em.
Why are people saying this? The multiplayer was literally the main selling point since it was first announced
Nintendo's track record with party systems in their team based games is absolutely horrendous.
Even better, it was "How do you not know campaign is the main mode", like it's some all known fact by everyone.
That's probably because the multiplayer and cloud functionality were the main reason for the delays in the first place. Which again begs the question, if it's presumably not important, why didn't they just launch the main game (the campaign, according to some, lol) and bring the multiplayer later on?
Not sure why you would be surprised a game of this scope being in the works for 5 years isn't buggy. That's the least I'd expect.
Because they need to do damage control on their console exclusive.