-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
CryEngine - Neon Noir: Hardware agnostic ray tracing benchmark
- Thread starter kostacurtas
- Start date
OP
OP
19-33 fps, depending on the scene, on my 1080Ti at 4K and ray tracing on ultra.
28-43 fps, at 4K and ray tracing on very high (that is the lowest setting).
I am impressed.
28-43 fps, at 4K and ray tracing on very high (that is the lowest setting).
I am impressed.
Neon Noir Raytracing Benchmark on my Vega 56:
Settings: Resolution 1080p Raytracing Ultra
FPS low: 38fps
FPS high: 82 fps
FPS avg: in the 58ies
Score: 5462
Settings: Resolution 1080p Raytracing Ultra
FPS low: 38fps
FPS high: 82 fps
FPS avg: in the 58ies
Score: 5462
Last edited:
Wow. This is gonna completely invalidate the existence of Nvidia's RTX lineNeon Noir Raytracing Benchmark on my Vega 56:
Settings: Resolution 1080p Raytracing Ultra
FPS low: 38fps
FPS high: 82 fps
FPS avg: in the 58ies
Score: 5462
Nah. It's just that this RT pipeline is pretty good optimized. Of course it would be much faster by using RT cores.
why would they? Everyone has their own engine now or are comfortable using UE4
Please share your score so I know how my Vega 56 compares to your Vega 64 ... ;)
https://wccftech.com/neon-noir-crye...ic-ray-tracing-demo-tested-and-available-now/
These benchmarks show that the majority of the rtx cards outperform amds offerings at both 1080p and 1440p.
My old card didn't do too well on this.
980TI at 1080p(RayTracing on Ultra)
Score:4805
Highest: 67
Lowest:40
Average:45-50
980TI at 1080p(RayTracing on Ultra)
Score:4805
Highest: 67
Lowest:40
Average:45-50
Wccftech has benchmarks
This implementation may have been bigger news if AMD had anything to offer above 2060 perf levels.
This implementation may have been bigger news if AMD had anything to offer above 2060 perf levels.
Console games would hopefully utilize the built-in hardware to accelerate RT.
interesting results. is this really not using Nvidia's RT cores, cause the results could imply that
It doesn't because it's dialled back compared to the RT we've seen in games that utilise hardware accelerated ray tracing.
DF actually talked about about where they cut corners in one of their videos.
For example look at this scene below, three of the shells on there don't have any reflections because it's only doing glossy reflection on surfaces that are smooth and shiny, but not for surfaces which are slightly rougher (but should still reflective).
Last edited:
That's a good question. AFAIK, it does not make use of Microsoft DXR pipeline and as such, does not use the RT cores. It's probably because Turing is generally better optimized for RT workflows.
It doesn't use RT hardware. It's interesting because it means that Turing cards are inherently good at raytracing even without the hardware.
Actually we already knew this because the 1660 cards take a way smaller hit with RTX effects enabled than Pascal cards. Neither have RT hardware.
I see, whenever they add proper DXR support, then we'll see even better performance then
Would Sony or Microsoft be able to have their own RT library or whatever for all the devs to use?
Turing cards are crushing the benchmark. Does that mean despite being API agonistic, it still using the Ray tracing hardware?
MS will use DirectX like all their consoles. Sony will probably make a vulkan extension like Nvidia did
I agree. We could even a much bigger gap then what we are seeing here.
Ray tracing, HDR, 4K, particle physics out the wahzoo, all at a locked 30 fps... and I am all the way in.
Vega 64
4788 at 1440p Very High. Stayed closed to 50 fps, went up to ~65, and down to ~45
3584 at 1440p Ultra. Averaged below 40fps, ranged from 30 to just over 50fps
7705 at 1080p Very High. Seemed to be 70 to 100 FPS. Dipped into the 70s slightly less I guess. barely a difference compared to Ultra
7700 at 1080p Ultra.
4788 at 1440p Very High. Stayed closed to 50 fps, went up to ~65, and down to ~45
3584 at 1440p Ultra. Averaged below 40fps, ranged from 30 to just over 50fps
7705 at 1080p Very High. Seemed to be 70 to 100 FPS. Dipped into the 70s slightly less I guess. barely a difference compared to Ultra
7700 at 1080p Ultra.
Last edited:
this seems to only support reflections right now. UE4 supports the whole shebang
Seems like this bench calculates the score like the FFXV benchmark, in that something like 6259 equals a 62.59fps avg. Because its a fixed bench with no random elements, its much more reliable.
1080p: 8470, 70 min/114 max fps
1440p: 5227, 45 min/71 max fps
2160p: 2519, 21min/34 max fps
High power CPU (4770k, 4.2Ghz all core), Max performance mode gpu, no gpu oc (EVGA 1080 Ti SC2). Ultra settings, fullscreen.
1080p: 8470, 70 min/114 max fps
1440p: 5227, 45 min/71 max fps
2160p: 2519, 21min/34 max fps
Hmm, i have seen this before, but they have actually explained the technique.
Interesting approach, i hope more engines will adopt it, though it requires full voxelization of the scenes
www.cryengine.com
Interesting approach, i hope more engines will adopt it, though it requires full voxelization of the scenes
CRYENGINE | How we made Neon Noir - Ray Traced Reflections in CRYENGINE and more!
Ahead of GDC 2019, we revealed Neon Noir, a research and development project showcasing real-time mesh ray traced reflections and refractions created with an advanced new version of CRYENGINE’s Total Illumination real-time lighting solution. Needless to say, we did receive a lot of questions...
www.cryengine.com
