So as I said, I feel lol those can be construed differently.he was referring to hype in online communities, i'm referring to the marketing sony gave it.
Agreed. I think that's exactly why Sony moved it to April to ensure that happened.Makes sense. I do think this game will at least make it's budget back. The mainstream audience still likes zombie stuff, and there isn't much else coming out right now in terms of AAA open world games.
Just as a note, Dying Light was a low 70s game and it was successful enough including with its post-launch support that
Dying Light was a low 70s game and it was successful enough including with its post-launch support that we're getting a Dying Light 2 that looks a lot better.
The Order was a super short and linear game. Days Gone is as close to sitting in the 60s, as The Order is to sitting in the 50s. I don't think it's ideal comparing both situations.
Days Gone offers a fun game experience with a lot of elements but lacks the refinement and creativity and innovation, long hours of the game by its main story and if you love to collect everything with games, this game is very busy with so many side missions and developments that are available to you, This game has exceeded my expectations after my experience of it more than once before the E3 exhibitions in the past years and with some additional modifications perhaps in the next parts may be the game is one of the titles of the other distinctive Sony and our series Anshardd example after the first part was medium but turned The chain then to a very strong title and Game Days Gone Remember me so much.
Agree with this post 100%This is the problem when people on this site run full fucking free PR campaigns for games and studios and let their hype get wildly out of control. We get the usual faces posting multiple upon multiple threads pulled from the official PlayStation site/blog with no thoughts of their own, just copy and pasted videos. We got a hype thread with people discussing the glowing previews. It happens all the time but it's overlooked because it's strangely the norm. It's no wonder people expect the world and then feel let down when a game just turns out to be average to good.
I'll be picking this up in a few months with a heavy discount no doubt. The horde mechanic looks great, sadly it seems like it's not used enough.
Klepek's review (in progress?) is scathing.
What I don't understand is how Sony, who are amazing at funding creative and varied projects, greenlit a generic dudebro biker game with zombies. I know that this was probably done ages ago, but it seems so out of character for Sony to push something so creatively bankrupt and uninspired.
The Last of Us Part 2 will save us. Hopefully.
Unless it ends up being open world too.
It's spin city for the die hard defenders of this game
The amount of vitriol that was spewed at people (like myself) for stating this was "generic" and skeptical because Sony Bend were an unproven developer is pathetic. I have no doubt this game will sell well and will have mindless fun with the zombie hordes but this was never going to be some special "amazing" experience like GoW/Spider-Man/TLOU/Uncharted/Infamous/Horizon etc
Those developers have proven track records and an army of top tier talent. I think Bend just got caught up in the "TPS narrative" experiences the other 1st Party Studios were shooting for and thought they could match that level of intensity and perfection
Looks like another Ghost Recon Wildlands.
Fun for folks that are into that kind of gameplay but a pass for most. Both scored in the 70s.
I'm not sure if I agree there - the lower the budget, the more important critical reception is for discovery and user acquisition. The big budget games just throw more $ at that problem.75 is not a bad score...if your game is a low budget indie title that's like $20.
i think you'd be alone in thinking that, but let's agree to disagreeEra loves him too so I honestly think Crackdown 3 had more hype,
It at 73 right now. It will drop to 70 is my guess. In the end, (yes, I'm saying it again) it's a 7/10 game. It's a good game. And that, yes, makes me happy :)Not if it drops below a 7/10 right? Anyway my first point wasn't about scores, it was about the actual reviews (which are more important). Cling to your 7/10 if you want, whatever makes you happy :)
You're definitely not wrong, but I maintain that a 75 for a new IP isn't nearly as bad as a 75 for God of War 2 would've been. There's a lot more room for error (and for consumers forgiving said errors).Yes but similarly priced at $60, and that's where it's actually in same ball game. There are many quality games released today, you wanna earn those $60, you gotta be up there. The competition is real.
Huh. I knew this was going to be weaker than some people thought, but I thought my 78 guess was pretty solid. Some of these scores are genuinely bad, it's Anthem all over again.
Looks like another Ghost Recon Wildlands.
Fun for folks that are into that kind of gameplay but a pass for most. Both scored in the 70s.
You are naively optimistic. Obviously every Sony 1st Party game, even Naughty Dogs, is doomed because Bends first console game in ages didn't turn out to be amazing.I imagine Naughty dog,Sucker punch and Kojima must be looking at these scores right about now and trying to reevaluate their strategy
TLOU2 might be safe since it's more linear, but Ghost of tsushima and Death stranding are both open world games
and in 2020 the world won't be so kind to open world games anymore, hope they manage to meet expectations but I have my doubts especially for death stranding hope I'm wrong tho and they turn out to be amazing experiences but who knows
Looks like another Ghost Recon Wildlands.
Fun for folks that are into that kind of gameplay but a pass for most. Both scored in the 70s.
I look confused when I see people say the game is getting slaughtered/it's a massacre when it's mostly 7's.
What the fuck is it called when a game gets mostly 4's or below?
there is a difference to the expectations based on a game's budget and dev/publisher pedigree.
The biggest downer from all these reviews is that it sounds like the game is aggressively bloated.
20 hours to reach the end of Act I? 40 hours until your first horde mission? I thought hordes were supposed to be the signature gameplay feature of this game -- not a detail that gets stuffed in after you have nearly 2 days' worth of in-game playtime.
Those games also wouldn't be those studios' first AAA console game. They have the experience and history for making amazing console games.75 is not a bad score...if your game is a low budget indie title that's like $20. Can you imagine Sony releases Uncharted 5 and it gets below 80? Or God of War 2 that's 70. Not a good look right?
...then...
yeah i can't take people who think this is a decent or good result seriously. i can imagine no one at bend is happy right now, this isn't the number you want after spending years on an exclusive for a publisher like sony. this is a bad result by any definition.
It feels very un-Sony like. Like all their studios make these visually distinct games, and out of nowhere comes Bend with another zombie shooter that looks like every other open world game.Klepek's review (in progress?) is scathing.
What I don't understand is how Sony, who are amazing at funding creative and varied projects, greenlit a generic dudebro biker game with zombies. I know that this was probably done ages ago, but it seems so out of character for Sony to push something so creatively bankrupt and uninspired.
This is the problem when people on this site run full fucking free PR campaigns for games and studios and let their hype get wildly out of control. We get the usual faces posting multiple upon multiple threads pulled from the official PlayStation site/blog with no thoughts of their own, just copy and pasted videos. We got a hype thread with people discussing the glowing previews. It happens all the time but it's overlooked because it's strangely the norm. It's no wonder people expect the world and then feel let down when a game just turns out to be average to good.
I'll be picking this up in a few months with a heavy discount no doubt. The horde mechanic looks great, sadly it seems like it's not used enough.
Dying Light is the best zombie game this gen so far, and it has the word of mouth to show for that.Dying Light was a low 70s game and it was successful enough including with its post-launch support that we're getting a Dying Light 2 that looks a lot better.
The Order was a super short and linear game. Days Gone is as close to sitting in the 60s, as The Order is to sitting in the 50s. I don't think it's ideal comparing both situations.
Depends on some publications though, i can see Edge giving this game a 4.It at 73 right now. It will drop to 70 is my guess. In the end, (yes, I'm saying it again) it's a 7/10 game. It's a good game. And that, yes, makes me happy :)
Stop with the Syphon Filter nonsense. They days of Syphon Filter games are gone.You had mother fucking Syphon Filter right there. In your lap.
They went with biker zombies.
Sorry, still a little salty lol.
I always expect a 4 or a 5 from from Edge. No matter what game it is :PDying Light is the best zombie game this gen so far, and it has the word of mouth to show for that.
Depends on some publications though, i can see Edge giving this game a 4.