Just gonna add my two cents and say the game looks real pretty graphically. Still not that all convinced by the game but i feel like a solid gameplay demo could still reel me in somehow. The previous ones left me wanting tbh.
What gets me is that Sony didn't even bother showing it at e3. Feels like Sony's crack down to me. At least it has that Sony look to it so I might give it a try.
This is such shallow and meaningless critique though. Days Gone is a complex, dynamic world with more emergent gameplay opportunity than The Last of Us. It gives the player more options. If you had any idea about this you would not be attempting to call what is dealing with the horde as "mindless," considering there are multiple approach strategies (as Game Informer footage showed), you can run from it at any point, or you can divert it and let them loose in enemy camps, which is cool as fuck and I've never seen that done before. Nothing mindless about it.
Days Gone has had plenty shown and imho looked very generic and underwhelming. Others agree. LoU on the other hand looked pretty damn amazing every time it was shown.
I mean, you're comparing tense action scenes played out between Joel and enemies with extreme brutality versus a mindless fight against a zombie horde. Not hard to see why people would be more hyped for LoU, and that's not even mentioning ND being the developer.
And as far as LoU2 is concerned, it's the sequel to LoU. Of course people will be hyped without having even played it. It's a sequel.
I would also not call out Crackdown 3 as an example of a game that is free from drive-by posting and negativity.While you are correct the poster's intent seems to be that even though those games are bad in their eyes they are not going to enter those thread with negative Nancy opinions to derail the threads original intent. Savvy?
Perhaps, and hear me out on this one, Days Gone excites a lot more people than we thought. Whew, that's a really hot take here.
Also, I've seen a lot of people in this thread say something like "People will get confused and can mix the two games up thinking TLOU is Days Gone, vice versa", where did this idea come from? Cause zombies?
I would also not call out Crackdown 3 as an example of a game that is free from drive-by posting and negativity.
If this thread were about Crackdown 3 winning a most anticipated award, I assure you the discussion would be as (if not more) toxic.
From people that have never actually played TLoU or seen Days Gone. Because there's no fucking way you could genuinely confusing the two otherwise.
Also, I've seen a lot of people in this thread say something like "People will get confused and can mix the two games up thinking TLOU is Days Gone, vice versa", where did this idea come from? Cause zombies?
The motorcycle, you see in the Last of Us Joel and Henry were talking about riding a chopper.
This here leads people to believe that Days Gone is in the Last of Us universe.
I don't think story will be a problem with this game:Mission variety, pacing and story are somewhat of a unknown quantity.
I actually think the story is one of the best aspects of Days Gone :)
I agree with this maybe, personally I am not interested in Days Gone at the moment, but this is probably the only Sony title I've not been interested in a quite a long while, though I wish Bend the best with their new game. It does look "less" polished, and yeah, Sony has set a high bar.I think a reason why some folks are being hyper critical about the game might simply be the level of quality Sony has been publishing games these past few years. Some of the best games of the year are published by Sony, exuding quality and polish. Meanwhile, it's not even that Days Gone looks particularly bad or anything but it looking more on the mediocre side, given the publisher, may be on harsher scrutiny by the high bar Sony has set. I dunno.
Of course you get those console warrior trash concern trolling posts but those are easy to point out. I'm just speaking more of the general era member I guess.
I think a reason why some folks are being hyper critical about the game might simply be the level of quality Sony has been publishing games these past few years. Some of the best games of the year are published by Sony, exuding quality and polish. Meanwhile, it's not even that Days Gone looks particularly bad or anything but it looking more on the mediocre side, given the publisher, may be on harsher scrutiny by the high bar Sony has set. I dunno.
Of course you get those console warrior trash concern trolling posts but those are easy to point out. I'm just speaking more of the general era member I guess.
Nice try. Those games you mentioned all make sense for being green lighted. They do not closely resemble any other game in Sony's portfolio of games.Sony stated this many times but their policy is to let developers pitch their ideas and if it sound cool then they can do it. It might look Medicare to you but the previews we have seen clearly shows Bend's ambition and trust in the game. They have wanted to make this game after they got bored of Syphon Filter and decided to kill the main character off. Sony allows this because they know it is better for the developer to make what they want because it results in a product made of passion.
Thank god Sony isn't thinking the same as you because then we wouldn't have gotten games like GoW4, Horizon or even Ghost of Tsushima.
I, umm, quoted why that is.
Neither does days goneNice try. Those games you mentioned all make sense for being green lighted. They do not closely resemble any other game in Sony's portfolio of games.
You either didn't read my post or not understood the point so let me say it again:Nice try. Those games you mentioned all make sense for being green lighted. They do not closely resemble any other game in Sony's portfolio of games.
I'm not interested in debating how Days Gone and TLOU are different from one another. Neither of us is changing our minds on that point.You either didn't read my post or not understood the point so let me say it again:
Sony only asks developers to pitch what they want to make and if it sounds cool then they let them do it. Period.
Doesn't matter how they "resemble" each others (even though Last of Us and Days Gone are very different in everything but the fact they both have an apocalyptic setting).
Also do you mind explaining how Days Gone and Last of Us resemble each other? Because what we know and seen about Days Gone clearly show huge difference.
It is clear you haven't even done research about Days Gone. A good place to start would be the previews thread linked earlier in the topic.
Ah yes sorry. Didn't specify that lol.It was not apparent in that quote, that he was a translator and new the story.
But if his taste is similar to mine the story may be good.
You either didn't read my post or not understood the point so let me say it again:
Sony only asks developers to pitch what they want to make and if it sounds cool then they let them do it. Period.
Doesn't matter how they "resemble" each others (even though Last of Us and Days Gone are very different in everything but the fact they both have an apocalyptic setting).
Also do you mind explaining how Days Gone and Last of Us resemble each other? Because what we know and seen about Days Gone clearly show huge difference.
It is clear you haven't even done research about Days Gone. A good place to start would be the previews thread linked earlier in the topic.
Zombie fatigue doesn't really exist, but people like to think it does.which zombie fatigue? there are people buying COD for the zombie mode...i think the zombie fatigue is a myth, what is with RE2 Remake, this is also a zombie game at its core and many people are awaiting that too, same with Dying Light 2
Zombie fatigue doesn't really exist, but people like to think it does.
Notice how the ones making the "generic and bland" assertion about DG never elaborate on anything?
Still don't understand what's supposed to be so impressive about yet another "sad guy in the apocalypse" zombie game.
Bend should've made something else. Anything else.
Notice how the ones making the "generic and bland" assertion about DG never elaborate on anything?
That's how you know it's not true.
Perhaps, and hear me out on this one, Days Gone excites a lot more people than we thought. Whew, that's a really hot take here.
And yet it closed an E3, had a big presence at the next E3, and has had almost 2 hours of gameplay shown.What gets me is that Sony didn't even bother showing it at e3. Feels like Sony's crack down to me. At least it has that Sony look to it so I might give it a try.
I'm looking forward to DG, but I feel disappointed every time I think back to the "open world horror game" tease years ago. I really hoped it would tackle something else; eldritch horror? Horror from space (like The Blob) in an open world town? Something different.
Hell, even vampires. Imagine an I Am Legend like open world where in the day you scavenge for survival supplies and fortification tools. You have to get back to your home/base/whatever before the sun goes down and prepare for vampire attacks with what you found during the day. It could still have a strong narrative core. Something other than damn zombies/infected/whatever.
This is what you said as a response to my point:I'm not interested in debating how Days Gone and TLOU are different from one another. Neither of us is changing our minds on that point.
I only wanted to say nothing would indicate I wasn't in favor of Sony funding GoW, Horizon, or Ghost of Tsushima, and yet you just made that assertion.
Yeah I know how you feel."do you mind explaining how Days Gone and Last of Us resemble each other? Because what we know and seen about Days Gone clearly show huge difference."
I asked this already the answer was basically: zombies and they "look the same" to people who have never seen either game before lmao.