-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
DCEU Era |OT| Crisis on Infinite Forums
- Thread starter Loxley
- Start date
- Status
T2 as in what? Not Terminator 2 I don't think you mean. Also in Civil War the parents angle wasn't as explicitly on the nose as this, and had been established in the previous film.
Someone frozen for 80 years knowing about the true nature of Starks parents over Stark who has tons of government contacts and contracts is equally, if not, laugable. They've even shown Tony doesn't trust what SHIELD tells him when he hacks into their servers in Avengers. Yet somehow, Cap knows.
I didn't say it was done tho. It's far along because it was. The release was in November. JL would've been finished before that with a few months to spare.
People complained that Batman stopped cos their parents had the same name, yet in Civil War cape literally says Crossbones saying Bucky triggered humans it made him "return to being a kid in Brooklyn"
https://youtu.be/bwbuluSHPLI
Honestly the only difference is one showed Batman having his flashback whilst the other film spelt it out for audiences.
. No matter how many mental gymnastics people go through to say it's different I will never be convinced. You can argue those films did it better because reasons or bvs didn't make it clear he was trying to say save Martha Kent on account he had a boot to his throat at the time. But this is a well worn debate
Last edited:
I'm at this point. I just want to see what his vision for the film.
Same here. I'll take storyboards with voice overs at this point.
You literally see him get this piece of information in The Winter Soldier. The bad guy even gave a huge monologue about it.
Ok. It still doesn't change the fact Stark somehow doesn't have a clue what happened to his own parents given he's either the smartest man in the room or the second smartest along with them showing a general distrust of SHIELD in the Avengers.
Marvel's inner workings is some real boring shit. I check out every time I read something about Shield, Sokovia Accords, Hydra, or some random episode villain that dropped some cliche nonsense before jobbing.
Sounds Like steppenwolf too bruh^^^. Spouting diatribes just to get washed by the league. Tbh apart from Michael Shannon and "some" of eisenberg DC hasn't had any other good villains either. They all get washed like wastemen too.
Last edited:
MHWilliams what are the chances Snyder comes back? Is he done with WB? Could he legally be allowed to do like a x-men movie or something?
Snyder's never directing a DC movie again, or at the very least a long time. But he still has a first-look deal with WB, and he will most likely still consider it his go to/home studio. He even has his own office on the WB lot.
Not sure why it's so hard to make a good villain for a movie. Maybe it's because there's just not enough time? Maybe it's because they're usually only in one movie whereas in a comic book they constantly come back or someone like Lex is always just in the background?
Shannon was good, but that was just Shannon. Zod at his core seems no better than any other strong motherfuckers
Shannon was good, but that was just Shannon. Zod at his core seems no better than any other strong motherfuckers
Ashhong thats a good Q. I think it's because most films in the genre are hero first and the villains get barely any screentime. Most bad villains suffer from this a la Malkieth, Kaecilius, ares, and guy from Suicide Squad. Just there as a speed bump, like James Bond. 0 character motivations, 0 plot developments.
Being smart doesn't mean he knows everything or that secrets can't be hidden from him. You're wandering into bleepy territory here
Fucking nice
Hey guys, we get a whole one bonus scene on the JL Blu Ray! I hope the scene is 3 hours long.
Is it the scene were the league is at Burger King and talk about Zack Snyder?
Especially for origin films, you're using all this time to establish the hero themselves. You don't get a lot of time to establish the villain unless you tie them explicitly to hero.
Great casting.
Villains only get one movie which undercuts their overall significance. They're never allowed to have a victory either. It doesn't help that most don't even get the courtesy of putting up a fight. The hero or heroes show up like John Cena, hit the 5 moves of doom, and roll out with the easy W.
If only there were action movies where villains only get one movie and are still memorable.
I'm not saying they don't exist...
However, in the current CBM world, most are cannon fodder.
In the whole of action movies, most are cannon fodder.
CBM films are just science fiction action films!
I'm sure there are some but what are they? Memorable not because they're cool like Terminator 2, but because they are a good character
I vote Royalton in Speed Racer :)
Fan art but looks good
It's probably has more to do with the fact that people are going into these movies to watch the heroes instead of the villain. They want to see the heroes win and kick ass and be cool. A good villain doesn't really allow that. When a director gives a shit about story integrity, they'll give you a good villain like BvS, The Dark Knight, X2, but on the whole, this genre was cooked up to sell toys so villains are fodder like Saibamen in Dragonball.
I wonder if JL will do better in home video release than in theaters
I always enjoy when his guy pops up in random tv and film. Great choice for the role.
I assume you're referring to Batman and/or Superman (depending on your allegiance, delete as applicable) when you say that?
Seems like Squad guys are back in the gym
https://www.instagram.com/p/BeHAk-aHWGY/
El Diablo isn't dead?
https://www.instagram.com/p/BeHAk-aHWGY/
- Status