Democratic Presidential Primaries & Caucuses |March OT| Last Tuesday was 1000 years ago, old news no one cares about (Discussion Guidelines in OP)

Status
Not open for further replies.

klonere

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
3,439
Perhaps that is the problem.

The messenger is flawed; AOC doesn't have these same issues.
I mean for the Bernie brothers, they can at least take solace that the environment itself will more than likely foster some level of revolution in the future. A revolution that the working class will lose but a revolution nonetheless.

Also, AOC has 5 years to start building up "issues". That's basically century in hypernormalization era. I don't really have any faith in her surviving that time.
 

neon/drifter

Member
Apr 3, 2018
3,042
Calling the voters of South Carolina "not working class" is not coalition building.

Coalition building is more than policy proposals. It also is playing nice with others.
I doubt he whole cloth called the voters of SC "not working class" do you have a source for that?

And don't take that the wrong way I want to be informed.
 

Deleted member 82

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,626
"Trump bad. Obama great, therefore I great. M4A pie in the sky. Climate change? Eh, we'll deal with it at some point I guess."

There's your winning pitch. That's gonna galvanize the US population and the world. Trump must be quaking in his boots.

Sending my energy to Bernie, since I can't donate.
 

KidAAlbum

Member
Nov 18, 2017
2,251
Calling the voters of South Carolina "not working class" is not coalition building.

Coalition building is more than policy proposals. It also is playing nice with others.
You just dismissed that entire rebuttal based on some bad faith bs to his quote. Seriously, why is that by him attacking the very very wealthy, of which they are literally buying off politicians to do their bidding, an example of his failure in coalition building? What part of his talking points makes you question that?

Is it him saying "Trump divides us up. We're doing the exact opposite. Blacks, whites, latinos, native americans, asian americans, gay, straight, women, men,...."?

But because he rightly goes after corporate greed waging class war on the working class, he's failing? I don't follow. By not going after them I would say he's failing to build up a coalition that speaks for all of us. Him not speaking up on Israel, means he's failing the Palestinians. Him not speaking up the fossil fuel industry means he's failing the planet. Him not speaking up on the insurance industry and the drug industry is him failing the poor. Him not speaking up on the prison industrial complex is him failing to speak to those of us who have had family members imprisoned for it's racist drug laws, and racist policing.

Sorry, but he needs to attack those who have destroyed our communities.
 
Last edited:

klonere

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
3,439
Not very reassuring to people without healthcare during a global pandemic!

“Maybe some of you will be helped”
yeah this shit is not a game. I don’t know how someone can say that with a straight face
I'm not saying it's a game, but as others have said, helping everyone isn't politically viable. Some will die, mostly the poor, but it seems like it's the will of the American people. Not enough electoral energy behind helping everyone - coalition building exercises entails compromise and that generally means the poor lose out as they are the most disposable in that conversation, severely lacking representation.

Which channel are you watching? M4A is favored by a majority of the US population, and in the democratic party, it polls above 60%+. Regularly.
Clearly not enough to be politically viable.

Well yeah, regardless of the results, it doesn't change the fact that he has given a significant influence to American politics. If he doesn't survive this, maybe someone from down the line will continue his efforts.

I don't believe the movement that he has created will die, even if he loses this election.
I very much doubt the movement survives this. This is very much last chance saloon stuff. The people behind Bernie, the biggest political names all nascent careers and are vulnerable to either changing course policy wise or simply losing power. They certainly don't have the clout to pick this whole thing back up after Bernie fails, the backlash from those who opposed him will be incredible. It will make AOC and co think twice about continuing down this route.

The organisations beneath him will dissipate energies into different causes without a single focal point, as electoralism in America is the ne ultra plus of direct action. Sure, you may have wins here and there on a state by state basis (raising minimum wages, legalization + forgiveness of marijuana etc etc) but universal programs just seem to be a third rail kind of thing and not feasible to build a coalition or campaign around.
 
Oct 27, 2017
8,318
Bandung Indonesia
I very much doubt the movement survives this. This is very much last chance saloon stuff. The people behind Bernie, the biggest political names all nascent careers and are vulnerable to either changing course policy wise or simply losing power. They certainly don't have the clout to pick this whole thing back up after Bernie fails, the backlash from those who opposed him will be incredible. It will make AOC and co think twice about continuing down this route.

The organisations beneath him will dissipate energies into different causes without a single focal point, as electoralism in America is the ne ultra plus of direct action. Sure, you may have wins here and there on a state by state basis (raising minimum wages, legalization + forgiveness of marijuana etc etc) but universal programs just seem to be a third rail kind of thing and not feasible to build a coalition or campaign around.
Ooooffff, when you say it like that... you might be right. I can see how so many people would be extremely dispirited if he loses right now.
 

Rran

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,429
I actually think Sanders has been incredibly effective in building a coalition: I mean, hardly anybody knew who this guy was last election cycle (I sure as hell didn't), and when he announced his campaign, pretty much everyone wrote him off, thinking he's crazy while they waited for Hillary to officially jump in. This old as dirt senator from Vermont somehow managed to inspire young people to vote, and he's been a legitimate force in politics since. Granted, there's a lot of pushback, but he somehow turned his once crazy ideas into something that, to a degree, actually seems attainable. I'm still shocked how he was able to create this movement that's become a legitimate talking point in our elections, and I genuinely believe his platform has a better chance of getting stronger rather than become a footnote.

fuck I'm late. Peace out, everyone, and may America feel the Bern on this super Tuesday...
 

farmland

Member
Oct 30, 2017
619
I'm not American but please don't vote for Biden, foreign policy and climate change require radical solutions and the center has had all the time in the world to deal with them and has been completely incapable. Dare to try something different.
 
Oct 27, 2017
8,318
Bandung Indonesia
I'm not American but please don't vote for Biden, foreign policy and climate change require radical solutions and the center has had all the time in the world to deal with them and has been completely incapable. Dare to try something different.
I am mostly concerned about how the US would continue to be a slave to Israel and AIPAC if he becomes president. With Bernie at least US-Israel will be shaken off somewhat, but with Biden? I don't have any hope.
 

neon/drifter

Member
Apr 3, 2018
3,042
I'm at the polls half an hour early. No one else in line. Weather is perfect. Volunteer workers are friendly but keep informing me "voting is at 6:30" to which I reply "oh I know I'm just beating the line"
 

.exe

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,821
I don't really understand why folks are voting "strategically" in primaries, e.g. bickering about whoever will do best against Trump. Whoever wins the nom will probably be able to challenge the presidency, even though it's never a done deal (apart from '08 which was an anomaly). So just vote for which candidate you think is best for you and the country at large, no? If they lose, you support the nominee at the general.

Anyway, from my outside perspective, Biden seems like a do-over of '16. Dude barely campaigns, does not come off well in public appearances and is coasting on his legacy/name. I don't really understand what people see in his policies, other than the vague idea of him being a "safe" pick against Trump. Though because of how some of the circumstances around him remind me of the previous GE, I would not be surprised if it doesn't quite go the way people want. Warren and Sanders seem like totally reasonable picks, though the former seems practically out of the running already.
 
Last edited:

Lentic

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,437
I don't really understand why folks are voting "strategically" in primaries, e.g. bickering about whoever will do best against Trump. Whoever wins the nom will probably be able to challenge the presidency, even though it's never a done deal (apart from '08 which was an anomaly). So just vote for which candidate you think is best for you and the country at large, no? If they lose, you support the nominee at the general.
This. Electability, pragmatism and safe candidates are a fucking disease in the Democratic Party. In theory, I don’t even mind people voting Warren at this stage, if only the people voting Biden due to “electability” concerns would vote for the candidate whose policies they like the most rather than playing it safe. Media and elites have done a great job at convincing people to vote against their interests in order to avoid a racist Republican in office.
 

Deleted member 10551

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,031
I don't really understand why folks are voting "strategically" in primaries, e.g. bickering about whoever will do best against Trump. Whoever wins the nom will probably be able to challenge the presidency, even though it's never a done deal (apart from '08 which was an anomaly). So just vote for which candidate you think is best for you and the country at large, no? If they lose, you support the nominee at the general.

Anyway, from my outside perspective, Biden seems like a do-over of '16. Dude barely campaigns, does not come off well in public appearances and is coasting on his legacy/name. Warren and Sanders seem like totally reasonable picks, though the former seems practically out of the running already.
It's about beating the establishment, or beating Bernie now. That's how much each side has grown to dislike the other.

If this mutual loathing and distrust wasn't there, Warren would probably be a frontrunner, but she's stuck in the middle, and folks had to pick a side of see their vote wasted.
 

Doukou

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,855
I wonder if all this talk of building coalition, earning votes and it being understandable if people who were vilified not wanting to support a candidate will come up in defense of Bernie voters in the general. If Bernie loses.
 

AnilP228

Member
Mar 14, 2018
469
U.K resident here. Can someone summarise the Bernie vs Biden situation and who is favourite to get the nomination? I understand that we're basically at a centrist (Biden) vs Progressive (Bernie) junction and that the democratic establishment don't want Bernie to win, but who is the favourite? From what I recall, Biden has performed poorly throughout the whole campaign but now his chances have gone up as he's getting the support of the other candidates?
 

.exe

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,821
It's about beating the establishment, or beating Bernie now. That's how much each side has grown to dislike the other.

If this mutual loathing and distrust wasn't there, Warren would probably be a frontrunner, but she's stuck in the middle, and folks had to pick a side of see their vote wasted.
If only multi-party coalition governments were a thing. Maybe if there was a proper left party that could come up with a progressive agenda together with the moderates, there'd be a big enough platform that most left leaning folks could agree on. Though, honestly, I'd sooner expect moderates to work with center-right than the left at this point.
 

neon/drifter

Member
Apr 3, 2018
3,042
Guy behind me in line just said "I hope when we come to this place in November the place is surrounded with cops for protection"

Geez. Older middle aged man. Talking to his wife.
 

Doukou

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,855
U.K resident here. Can someone summarise the Bernie vs Biden situation and who is favourite to get the nomination? I understand that we're basically at a centrist (Biden) vs Progressive (Bernie) junction and that the democratic establishment don't want Bernie to win, but who is the favourite? From what I recall, Biden has performed poorly throughout the whole campaign but now his chances have gone up as he's getting the support of the other candidates?
It’s basically coin flip of who gets a plurality and a coin flip if either get a majority.
If neither gets a majority it will be decided by superdelegates which most people assume favor Biden
 

Giant Panda

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,327
I really wish Warren was still competitive. I'm left with what I consider to be two shit choices, but I guess I'll hold my nose and pick one of them.
 

V_Arnold

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
1,166
Hungary
I very much doubt the movement survives this. This is very much last chance saloon stuff. The people behind Bernie, the biggest political names all nascent careers and are vulnerable to either changing course policy wise or simply losing power. They certainly don't have the clout to pick this whole thing back up after Bernie fails, the backlash from those who opposed him will be incredible. It will make AOC and co think twice about continuing down this route.

The organisations beneath him will dissipate energies into different causes without a single focal point, as electoralism in America is the ne ultra plus of direct action. Sure, you may have wins here and there on a state by state basis (raising minimum wages, legalization + forgiveness of marijuana etc etc) but universal programs just seem to be a third rail kind of thing and not feasible to build a coalition or campaign around.
Hey, let me just mention this program called the Green New Deal. Sounds like the perfect one-two punch with M4A to *any* progressive candidate to champion. If Bernie does not get the nomination, the movement will continue to grow. Its movements that build Bernie to be strong like he is now, not the other way around. "not me, us" is more than just a slogan.
 

MilkBeard

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,888
It's really sad that I keep seeing prominent people swear off Bernie just because of online trolls. How many times do we have to say this: social media does not reflect real life properly. This one author was saying Bernie supporters were like gamergaters. I swear to you, if you say something boneheaded like that then of course people are going to get mad.

Sigh.
 

TheHunter

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
16,447
I doubt he whole cloth called the voters of SC "not working class" do you have a source for that?

And don't take that the wrong way I want to be informed.

“When we talk about South Carolina, and when we talk about other places, we are winning working-class people by big numbers,” the Vermont senator said.

That implies the people who voted for Biden weren't working class. Black people to be specific.
 

xenocide

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,305
Vermont
I doubt he whole cloth called the voters of SC "not working class" do you have a source for that?

And don't take that the wrong way I want to be informed.
Well he mostly was referring to the black voters of SC via process of elimination. The full context was; In an interview after the SC results came in, he said he thought they did won with working class voters in the state—the problem is he lost every category of black voters which leaves basically white working class voters. This is consistently an issue for Sanders, he prioritizes class over race. He could have easily acknowledged they underperformed which was disappointing, but they’re committed to winning over all working class voters across the country. It would have acknowledged that in his mind working class voters were his priority, and that included black working class voters that didn’t vote for him.
 

TheHunter

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
16,447
You just dismissed that entire rebuttal based on some bad faith bs to his quote. Seriously, why is that by him attacking the very very wealthy, of which they are literally buying off politicians to do their bidding, an example of his failure in coalition building? What part of his talking points makes you question that?

Is it him saying "Trump divides us up. We're doing the exact opposite. Blacks, whites, latinos, native americans, asian americans, gay, straight, women, men,...."?

But because he rightly goes after corporate greed waging class war on the working class, he's failing? I don't follow. By not going after them I would say he's failing to build up a coalition that speaks for all of us. Him not speaking up on Israel, means he's failing the Palestinians. Him not speaking up the fossil fuel industry means he's failing the planet. Him not speaking up on the insurance industry and the drug industry is him failing the poor. Him not speaking up on the prison industrial complex is him failing to speak to those of us who have had family members imprisoned for it's racist drug laws, and racist policing.

Sorry, but he needs to attack those who have destroyed our communities.
Read my above quote.

He isn't good at playing nice with others outside his wheelhouse.
 

klonere

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
3,439
U.K resident here. Can someone summarise the Bernie vs Biden situation and who is favourite to get the nomination? I understand that we're basically at a centrist (Biden) vs Progressive (Bernie) junction and that the democratic establishment don't want Bernie to win, but who is the favourite? From what I recall, Biden has performed poorly throughout the whole campaign but now his chances have gone up as he's getting the support of the other candidates?
To be very crude, they are two sides of raw, emotional reactions to Trump.

Biden is the ultimate "I just want things to be normal again" status quo guy. Ties to Obama, forever a forefront Dem figure, no boat rocking, lots of platitudes, compromise candidate. Easy to line up behind because he represents safety. Considered to be the most electable for reasons.

Bernie is the "The system brought us Trump" radical change guy. Eternal outsider, only found national traction in 2016. Has a rag-tag collection of orgs and people behind him but pretty much zero established support. Renegade candidate in every sense, proposing sweeping societal change.

Basically it comes to down to these two things:

Do you think that Trump is an aberration, and that Republicans will revert to somewhat of a norm once he's gone? Biden.

Do you think it will only get worse after Trump? Bernie.

Bernie is still nominally the front runner but it's a two horse race and Biden has had the most recent wins, so in our breakneck speed narrative world, he's actually got all the momentum.
 

Lentic

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,437

“When we talk about South Carolina, and when we talk about other places, we are winning working-class people by big numbers,” the Vermont senator said.

That implies the people who voted for Biden weren't working class. Black people to be specific.
This is a stretch. He never says he's doing well with all working-class people, just that he's doing winning working-class people by big numbers.
 

xenocide

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,305
Vermont
I really wish Warren was still competitive. I'm left with what I consider to be two shit choices, but I guess I'll hold my nose and pick one of them.
My observation is if the number of people that claimed they wanted to vote for her just voted for her she might be doing better. Rather than doing 4D Electoral Calculus, why not support the candidate you most identify with?


This is a stretch. He never says he's doing well with all working-class people, just that he's doing winning working-class people by big numbers.
...the Democratic base there is almost entirely black, and he got walloped across the board by black voters. Either he knew what he was saying or he’s kind of dumb and didn’t consider the obvious ramifications of what he was saying. Neither is a good look.
 

klonere

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
3,439
Hey, let me just mention this program called the Green New Deal. Sounds like the perfect one-two punch with M4A to *any* progressive candidate to champion. If Bernie does not get the nomination, the movement will continue to grow. Its movements that build Bernie to be strong like he is now, not the other way around. "not me, us" is more than just a slogan.
Given the history of the left in America, I think i'm fairly confident in saying that it is indeed just a slogan, as much as anyone wants it to be otherwise. The GND will be butchered to be politically viable or may never even see the light of day.

Sorry!
 

V_Arnold

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
1,166
Hungary
This is a fantastic two-minute video for Bernie. Shared by AOC:


I have chills just by listening.


Given the history of the left in America, I think i'm fairly confident in saying that it is indeed just a slogan, as much as anyone wants it to be otherwise. The GND will be butchered to be politically viable or may never even see the light of day.

Sorry!
If there is one thing that the status quo does well, it is to make people think that better things are indeed not possible. That is just a mirage. Things can change quickly, and not just in one direction. There were better times in the US too.
 
May 26, 2019
112
Glad to see Joe Biden could actually win out on Super Tuesday. If all the polls we have been seeing lately are true, it completely destroys any argument about Bernie being able to turn out non-voters and young voters for the general election. I mean he is only leading in Very liberal and very progressive California by 7 points. Bernie’s ground game must be incredibly weak for those polls to be true. But then again, something weird could happen and Sanders may win, so idk.

Bloomberg is also gonna collapse tonight too and that’s a good thing everyone should be happy for.
 

RDreamer

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,395
To be very crude, they are two sides of raw, emotional reactions to Trump.

Biden is the ultimate "I just want things to be normal again" status quo guy. Ties to Obama, forever a forefront Dem figure, no boat rocking, lots of platitudes, compromise candidate. Easy to line up behind because he represents safety. Considered to be the most electable for reasons.

Bernie is the "The system brought us Trump" radical change guy. Eternal outsider, only found national traction in 2016. Has a rag-tag collection of orgs and people behind him but pretty much zero established support. Renegade candidate in every sense, proposing sweeping societal change.

Basically it comes to down to these two things:

Do you think that Trump is an aberration, and that Republicans will revert to somewhat of a norm once he's gone? Biden.

Do you think it will only get worse after Trump? Bernie.

Bernie is still nominally the front runner but it's a two horse race and Biden has had the most recent wins, so in our breakneck speed narrative world, he's actually got all the momentum.
I really don’t understand the whole “the system brought us Trump and Bernie will fix it” thing. How exactly does Bernie fix Trump being possible?
 

Shevek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,787
Cape Town, South Africa
This is a fantastic two-minute video for Bernie. Shared by AOC:


I have chills just by listening.
Yep, I'm on the other side of the world and would never in my life have thought that a political ad could do anything other than inspire either indifference or revulsion in me, but this moved me to tears. Even showed it to my parents who have less than zero interest in American politics and they ended up sending it to family we have in Cali.

Bernie absolutely needs to win.
 

Deleted member 82

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,626
If there is one thing that the status quo does well, it is to make people think that better things are indeed not possible. That is just a mirage. Things can change quickly, and not just in one direction. There were better times in the US too.
Yup, they nip in the bud any contemplation of change. And they make you rationalize it all by convincing you that the system is how it is and couldn't be altered to accommodate the will of the people.
 

eebster

Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,473

I have chills just by listening.




If there is one thing that the status quo does well, it is to make people think that better things are indeed not possible. That is just a mirage. Things can change quickly, and not just in one direction. There were better times in the US too.
That comment section is a fucking mess
 

alexiswrite

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,381
Yup, they nip in the bud any contemplation of change. And they make you rationalize it all by convincing you that the system is how it is and couldn't be altered to accommodate the will of the people.
It could be altered if the will of the people existed in a big enough number to completely reshape everything, but even if Bernie wins, it would seem that it doesn't.
 

klonere

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
3,439
A positive note is that the networks and media will do very well out of this being such a close ST. No doubt people will be glued to social media and TV to keep up, ensuring a ratings bump and more views on articles and info hubs. It's great to see an industry be so vibrant and support so many people doing the important work of journalism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.