I hope those "muh electability" voters are realising voting a candidate based on their connection to Obama was incredibly shortsighted.
One of the workers was only at Precinct V011 on Tuesday, March 17, Election Day, which is located at the Martin Luther King Community Center in Hollywood. The other worked at V020 at the David Park Community Center (also in Hollywood) as well as a Weston early voting location.
The supervisor said that county staff as well as other poll workers at the locations have been notified of the situation.
However, voters who were at the polls in person on March 17 at either of those locations or who voted early at the Weston early voting location may "wish to take appropriate steps and seek medical advice."
Coronavirus: Broward poll workers test positive for COVID-19
Seems pretty bad. I'm starting to think that lying to voters and telling them the CDC said it was safe to go vote on the 17th was a big mistake.
Whoever Biden's VP is will run effectively as an incumbent if Biden chooses to be 1 and done I am guessing, so I am not expecting much of an actual open primary in 2024.
Democrats are so fucking stupid. Cuomo has had the worst response compared to Inslee, Newsom, Prizker, etcIt's no longer just Hillary Clinton whom the betting markets feel has a better shot than Sanders at becoming the Democratic nominee. Now Cuomo is higher.
ANDREW CUOMO OVERTAKES BERNIE SANDERS IN ODDS TO BE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE AMID NEW YORK GOVERNOR'S PANDEMIC RESPONSE
An average of recent betting odds compiled by Real Clear Politics shows Cuomo with a 5.6 percent chance of becoming the Democratic presidential nominee, while Sanders trails with an average of 3.6 percent. Biden is far ahead however, with an average of 85.8 percent, while former 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who is not seeking the party's nomination, places second with an average of 6.3 percent
Hilarious and sad at the same time since people still think Sanders has a shot and should stay in.
Democrats are so fucking stupid. Cuomo has had the worst response compared to Inslee, Newsom, Prizker, etc
Democrats are so fucking stupid. Cuomo has had the worst response compared to Inslee, Newsom, Prizker, etc
Man, really sad how so many Americans just want the status quo instead of actual progressive policies. When you have people wanting fucking Hillary Clinton over Bernie, you know there's a fucking issue with American politics. Progress feels so slow in this country sometimes.It's no longer just Hillary Clinton whom the betting markets feel has a better shot than Sanders at becoming the Democratic nominee. Now Cuomo is higher.
ANDREW CUOMO OVERTAKES BERNIE SANDERS IN ODDS TO BE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE AMID NEW YORK GOVERNOR'S PANDEMIC RESPONSE
An average of recent betting odds compiled by Real Clear Politics shows Cuomo with a 5.6 percent chance of becoming the Democratic presidential nominee, while Sanders trails with an average of 3.6 percent. Biden is far ahead however, with an average of 85.8 percent, while former 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who is not seeking the party's nomination, places second with an average of 6.3 percent
Hilarious and sad at the same time since people still think Sanders has a shot and should stay in.
DEAR GOD ONLINE VOTING IS A BAD IDEA.Use the coronavirus as an excuse to do a nationwide online vote. It's a golden opportunity to throw out the entire hilariously outdated and useless system of disjointed primaries and caucuses for something that actually works, and if anyone whinges about how no one will ever care about Indiana or New Hampshire ever again, you can just tell them to kick rocks because it's for public safety.
The issues here are twofold, I think.Use the coronavirus as an excuse to do a nationwide online vote. It's a golden opportunity to throw out the entire hilariously outdated and useless system of disjointed primaries and caucuses for something that actually works, and if anyone whinges about how no one will ever care about Indiana or New Hampshire ever again, you can just tell them to kick rocks because it's for public safety.
Then at least swap to universal mail-in, if you're really that concerned about online voting. (I honestly don't think online is inherently any more fallible or corruptible than offline; not because online is "safe" but rather because people are operating under massive misapprehensions about how accurate and protected offline voting is.)
i dont think thats true. online voting, how do you vet the code, how do you keep it from malfunctioning or maliciously changing the vote?
How do you keep the humans doing recounts from lying, doctoring records, or just being tired and inattentive? Doing physical audits of their work is wildly impractical and just raises the further question of, "Who audits the auditors?"
There are vulnerabilities to online elections. There are vulnerabilities to physical elections. It's likely the prior are not actually that much more severe or difficult to mitigate than the latter. It honestly reminds me of when online banking first started to be a thing and everyone was terrified their money would get hacked.
In Florida at least, both parties supervise and monitor election offices with on the ground personnel to ensure no funny business. It was a big thing in 2018 when the results came down to the wire.
Is it possible one day to develop a system ala online banking? Sure. Over the course of a long multi-year development with massive testing.Use the coronavirus as an excuse to do a nationwide online vote.
While I think this would be a good idea, considering how well gerrymandering works, the political parties already know who you're statistically likely to vote for based on where you live. I can already imagine a world where we wake up to hearing about how thousands (or more) ballots were trashed (whether by political parties or activist postal workers).Then at least swap to universal mail-in, if you're really that concerned about online voting. (I honestly don't think online is inherently any more fallible or corruptible than offline; not because online is "safe" but rather because people are operating under massive misapprehensions about how accurate and protected offline voting is.)
Warren not even waiting until her ostensible friend and fellow progressive Bernie officially loses for her to start gearing up her "grassroots" organization for 2024.
Really puts a cherry on top of her campaign, which started out very well, but became incredibly narcissistic by the end.
Warren not even waiting until her ostensible friend and fellow progressive Bernie officially loses for her to start gearing up her "grassroots" organization for 2024.
Really puts a cherry on top of her campaign, which started out very well, but became incredibly narcissistic by the end.
Last thing the Republicans want. They do best when the least amount of people vote, so making it easier is kryptonite for them.Use the coronavirus as an excuse to do a nationwide online vote. It's a golden opportunity to throw out the entire hilariously outdated and useless system of disjointed primaries and caucuses for something that actually works, and if anyone whinges about how no one will ever care about Indiana or New Hampshire ever again, you can just tell them to kick rocks because it's for public safety.
^^^If it's between Team Warren and "Not me, us, but no actually me for as long as I can legally stay in" I'll happily go Team Warren.
Warren not even waiting until her ostensible friend and fellow progressive Bernie officially loses for her to start gearing up her "grassroots" organization for 2024.
Really puts a cherry on top of her campaign, which started out very well, but became incredibly narcissistic by the end.
I fail to see the problem?The solutions we advocate for now can and should have a lasting impact on our economy and our government. America can come out of this crisis stronger than before — but only if we rally around bold solutions, rather than temporary fixes and short-term deals.
So when a greedy corporation is trying to rig the system and cheat working people, we'll speak out.
When Democrats are running on strong progressive values, we'll shine a spotlight on them.
AOC will be old enough but I'm not sure if she wants to rush into a presidential election so young.
AOC may run into one of the same problems that Hillary Clinton did - she showed the Republicans that she was a real threat early enough that by the time she's ready to run, they'll have years or decades of fan fiction out in the wild to build a message against her with.
She'll make one hell of a Speaker of the House or Cabinet Secretary, though.
Comparing against Clinton's margin in 2016 (via exits):
Is this about her not dropping out early and endorsing Bernie Sanders? Nothing else makes sense, but I would be open to hearing your detailed explanation for the narcissist claim.
Sub samples in the polls always ay have higher MOE.
You're upset that a presidential campaign was a vehicle to try to make the candidate become president. Lol.
Who the fuck are these 11% Liberals voting Trump?
Racists probably
There are a ton of self-identified progressives who are "progressive" when it comes to economic justice and regressive when it comes to racial justice.
Warren not even waiting until her ostensible friend and fellow progressive Bernie officially loses for her to start gearing up her "grassroots" organization for 2024.
Really puts a cherry on top of her campaign, which started out very well, but became incredibly narcissistic by the end.