• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Nome

Designer / Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,312
NYC
I disagree. While it is true that Battlefield V is not obliged to be historically accurate, whether it's books or films or videogames -- all these have always faced criticism for portraying real events -- or fictional events in a real time period -- in an overtly inaccurate way. To varying degrees a significant number of people do care that, for example, Braveheart is complete nonsense. Or that The Great Escape played far too fast and loose with the lives and deaths of those individuals.

Just look at the criticism of the recently released Bohemian Rhapsody film for taking real events that happened and twisting them into something misleading. This falls under the umbrella of "historical accuracy".

Battlefield's problem at its heart is that its multiplayer is quite popular and multiplayer games by nature are never historically accurate and fun at the same time and anyone pretending otherwise is deluding themselves a bit. Historical accuracy is the domain of singleplayer games. Battlefield has long had singleplayer campaigns. So it does fall under that scrutiny to some degree.

The recent 11-11 Memories Retold by Aardman is a recent example of a videogame that has tried to be historically accurate for the purposes of making the stories it has to tell more genuine.
This type of criticism has zero traction behind it. No one is boycotting the game because it's historically inaccurate. No one is writing lengthy Reddit posts because it's historically inaccurate. People who care about this sort of stuff make a note of it and move on. My point is that the people brigading and upvoting shit don't give two fucks about it being historically accurate. They're completely fine with inaccuracies until women and minorities come into play.

Also, elenarie getting called out by the idiots on Reddit, that's how you know you're doing it right
https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefiel..._dice_dev_posts_on_resetera_if_anything_this/
 

Kadath

Member
Oct 25, 2017
621
So battlefield 1942, secret weapons of ww2 expansion? lol

By the way, I didn't think this existed.

From wikipedia:

IGN summarized its reaction in its review of the game: "Secret Weapons of WWII, while based in historical equipment and encounters, nevertheless offers up a steroid-enhanced version of the regular game with plenty of new weapons that were on the cutting edge of technology (or merely on the drawing board) at the close of the Second World War. For some players this extra touch of Hollywood seems a bit out of place relative to the previous games."
 

Skux

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,942
There is more behind the game failing than just the playable-women controversy and the childish reaction certain elements of the internet are having (particularly on reddit), even if it's the thing a large part of Era seems to focus on exclusively.

Yeah the communities on Reddit and Era are a fraction of the Battlefield fanbase.

It isn't selling quite simply because it's not a very good Battlefield game and is getting poor word of mouth. The content isn't there. The gameplay isn't there. But people will blame it on politics because it fits their narrative.
 
Oct 25, 2017
5,846
In Battlefield 1, an American gambler disguises himself as a member of the British upper class while making zero effort to use an accent which everyone notices and is played for laughs, and then he basically wins the Battle of Britain, before dramatically jumping off the side of an exploding German airship into the Thames. He survives, naturally,.

I recall exactly zero complaints about how this was spitting on the graves of the brave men who fought in the Battle of Britain.

Battlefield V comes along, and the weirdos go berserk. I feel like these were the same chaps who got vaguely upset over Hannah in Battlefield 4 (a very authentic character, incidentally, since China has an all-female special forces unit), but their discontent has been amplified by war nerd shit. In Enemy Front, an American journalist was pivotal in, IIRC, the enigma being cracked, and the Warsaw uprising, and also the Heavy Water sabotage operation. I don't remember howling outrage. Sniper Elite has you shooting Hitler in the nuts. Is this historically accurate? No. It doesn't have to be.

This recent wave of GAMER RAGE has become extremely unpleasant to witness. There have always been people trying to stir shit up. But now they feel empowered. I feel like Mass Effect 3 was a bit of a turning point.

On a minor note, DICE put a lot of effort into these campaigns. They're not always good, but as far as storytelling goes, it's something DICE take very seriously, and many reviewers were impressed by the humanity and general decent quality of the War Stories. I kinda wonder whether EA need to create a moderate budget singleplayer "War Story" series to explore human stories of war, basically. Hire people like Peter Jackson to consult. Go for the whole "art game" angle while also making them fun to play. Because making Battlefield campaigns is a bit like casting pearls before swine. The people raging about the contents of Battlefield V's campaign are the exact kind of people who are gonna refuse to play the campaign anyway because they're MP gamers and MP is all they care about. DICE are very proud of what they've made, and it's a pity their work is so ignored.

I really wish they actually pushed more for historical accuracy. As you point out, there were roles for women in these conflicts, as well as huge swaths of lives of soldiers (let alone civilians) we just don't see in games. French resistance fighters. Female SOE agents. Black american engineer corps. Most of the Eastern Front, almost all of the Chinese side of the war, the Phillipines, etc. But it gets flattened into just more variations of shooting.

As it is, it generally only gets brought up in these situations as a disingenuous proxy for culture wars.

I'd love for something like you imagine, though. If these games can't or won't support those tales more story-focused single player games might be a better fit.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
52,914

Okay? That doesn't tell me they are trying to be historically accurate. That tells me they wanna have just enough authenticity to make the game enjoyable while still being respectful.


They accomplished that. People need to stop trying to make the "historically accurate" defense work. It's not going to.
 

SolidSnakex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,339
Sledgehammer didn't give a fuck. They made a creative decision and stuck with it.
DICE's "mistake" was to directly engage the MAGA shitbirds and call them out.

I think there's more to it. People rarely want to give Activision credit for things, but from the start of this generation with Ghost they pulled the trigger on having women on the battlefield. This was all the way back in 2013. So since there those CoD fans have played a new game every single year that featured women. Which meant by the time WWII rolled around it was just a forgone conclusion that women would be in it. So there really wasn't much pushback to it because fans of the series were already on board with the idea. For whatever reason DICE was the hold out here. I think journalists had been asking them for as far back as BF3 why there weren't any female characters on the Battlefield, and they always had some excuse. And that hear certainly cranked up with BF4 because CoD that year had female characters. DICE still didn't really have a reason for why they weren't in.

So I think a big part of this is that a long time ago Activision made it clear that if you were playing a CoD game then you'd be seeing women on the battlefield. And that's how it'd be regardless of whether it was set in the present, future or past. And for as much as they've been maligned over the past generation for being kids while fans of other games were the real adults, it doesn't really seem like it bothered fans of that series.
 

Greywind

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
362
Okay? That doesn't tell me they are trying to be historically accurate. That tells me they wanna have just enough authenticity to make the game enjoyable while still being respectful.


They accomplished that. People need to stop trying to make the "historically accurate" defense work. It's not going to.
Hey I'm enjoying it too but when they claim to respect history and authenticity it sounds like they will go by the books. And there are some inaccuracies with the "untold" war stories but I'm not gonna derail the thread.
 

Luminish

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,508
Denver
They can interpret World War 2 however they want, and consumers will either respond to it positively and buy the game, or they won't.
Now this is where I call bullshit. No Battlefield fan can be this interested in historical accuracy in a Battlefield game to wish for it's death, with the knowledge that there's a large group of people wishing for that same thing to signal a stance against inclusivity.

I'm not saying you have to buy the game for the sake of wokeness, but you have to know historical accuracy will be the last thing on the list of takeaways from this games failure.
 

Jam

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,050
Yeah the communities on Reddit and Era are a fraction of the Battlefield fanbase.

It isn't selling quite simply because it's not a very good Battlefield game and is getting poor word of mouth. The content isn't there. The gameplay isn't there. But people will blame it on politics because it fits their narrative.

What? Nobody is blaming the poor sales on 'politics' aside from the people criticising the use of women. Even in this thread someone was bleating on about 'DICE got what they deserved, if they listened to the right it would have sold'.

There's been PLENTY of topics on Era and Reddit that have absolutely laid into Battlefield's content issue/release strategy.

And this is a topic specifically about the politics of a certain issue.

People are well aware the game didn't do as well as if could have due to competition and its own design flaws, no sane person is blaming the sales on women being present in the game besides those who are criticising it.
 

FRV

Member
Oct 27, 2017
367
The weird thing here is that Call of Duty WWII did the same thing, including women as soldiers in the multiplayer mode. It became one of the biggest sellers on PS4/Xbox One.

Are Call of Duty fans more mature than Battlefield fans?

Call of Duty never pushed women to the spotlight in COD WW2. It was only later known that they would be in multiplayer.

I think that's the reason, why it didn't have similar effect.
 

SapientWolf

Member
Nov 6, 2017
6,565
Or we could just not give a crap about historical accuracy and include women anyway?
I'd be down for exploding homing pigeons too, historical accuracy be damned.

Like the pigeons, I think expanding the Battlefield across both genders is transformative in a way that won't bother some people and will bother others, to varying degrees. But the people who are the most bothered by the gender issue happen to generally be shitty and misogynistic, so there's additional enjoyment to be had from their impotent cries of anguish.

Using a music analogy, if you're arranging a song and you change sections of it some people will undoubtedly complain. But the artist has to be confident in their art or there's no point. So I admire DICE's confidence in their vision.
 

endlessflood

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
8,693
Australia (GMT+10)
Now this is where I call bullshit. No Battlefield fan can be this interested in historical accuracy in a Battlefield game to wish for it's death, with the knowledge that there's a large group of people wishing for that same thing to signal a stance against inclusivity.

I'm not saying you have to buy the game for the sake of wokeness, but you have to know historical accuracy will be the last thing on the list of takeaways from this games failure.
Personally, I skipped BF5, and it's the first mainline game since BF2142 that I've skipped (2142 was due to non-gaming reasons). For me, the problem is the schizophrenic tone. They are slavishly accurate in some areas - no M1 Garand because British and German Forces didn't field them for example, and only maps that those two factions specifically fought on during a specific period of the war. And then in other areas, zero fucks are given because it allows them to sell more cosmetics, and this game is clearly focused on microtransactions now that Premium has been removed.

Weve had these same arguments over and over in BF5 threads. I've previously outlined many approaches they could've taken to, in my opinion, make a more cohesive game while still including their heavy microtransactions focus and still made good use of the WW2 setting.

Unfortunately, the game they've made sits in no man's land. It operates within some arbitrary constraints that limit enjoyment, but then not enough so as to sell the full WW2 setting and make some gains on that side from atmosphere/immersion, or whatever you prefer to call it.

I played the hell out of the BF5 Beta, and it never felt like a WW2 game to me, unlike DICE's previous WW2 entries in BF1942 and BF1943. It felt like watching airsoft players do a low budget WW2 re-enactment. I thought that was really sad, and I still don't know why they opted for WW2 as a setting.
 

Andrew Lucas

Banned
Nov 27, 2017
1,309
Y'all are not talking about the other victim of DICE's game, the WW2 vets, yes - they feel disrespected by this game, by the inclusion of women and minorities. I was just told this, vets are watching this game closely.
 

TI92

Alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,598
Y'all are not talking about the other victim of DICE's game, the WW2 vets, yes - they feel disrespected by this game, by the inclusion of women and minorities. I was just told this, vets are watching this game closely.
Yes I'm sure some WW2 vets are upset about women videogame avatars.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
52,914
if you think that's said, check out the thread at the "old place".

https://www./threads/genderfield-v-the-saga-continues.1468749/

Man, it makes me glad that Era doesn't stand for this kind of shit.

The title of the thread is fucking "GENDERFIELD" and there is not a mod in sight.


That place really has gone to hell since we left hasn't it.
 

Andrew Lucas

Banned
Nov 27, 2017
1,309
Complete "White people______" in any thread in that subreddit and you will get some interesting responses.
 

Deleted member 9100

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
3,076
I just wish it was a better game. As a big fan of battlefield 1, that game just seems better than this one in every way.
 

TheCthultist

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,442
New York
In response to this very thread:
rQYdFU5.jpg

So good news, it's working.
 

Luminish

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,508
Denver
Yes, you nailed the problem.

I was saying that complaints about historical accuracy can be legitimate. Even in this context I can believe that a few people are bothered by the presence of women simply as an immersion breaking level, without any political implication at all.

But it's also true (imo) that this argument is then used as some sort of trojan horse to use as a political movement and that sweeps over like a tsunami (same as GG used journalist transparency as another trojan horse). It's quite possible that a lot of that noise is even coming from people who never played a Battlefield game.

Because of this, it's important to keep them separate and not brush away the fact that some people CAN legitimately complain about historical accuracy and nothing else. They do not deserved to be clumped with bigots and misogynists.
So, maybe drop the defensiveness? You don't have to take this stuff so personally, and you do yourself a disservice by standing up to say why something isn't misogynist in a topic that you agree is about misogynists trying to latch on to those same arguments.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
52,914
For people who like to call others "snowflakes" they sure do like to complain alot and be melodramatic.
 

TI92

Alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,598
The literal fake news retelling of how and why resetera was formed is disgusting. Like... Is this just one twisted guys imagination or is there really some official storyline out there to retell?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/a2vsag/-/eb1ugzo

There is a site called "NeoGaf". Between the years 2012 and 2017, the place became overrun with far-left types openly banning/silencing anyone who dared speak out against the "popular opinion". Well, they weren't able to have as much control as they would like and so they created drama, posted porn, gore, and other nasty things enmasse to get banned and created their own site: ResetEra.

ResetEra is a gaming forum that hates games and gamers. They openly push racist agendas, hope for the deaths/exile of most (if not all) conservatives, openly dox members of the community they do not like (such as the former CDProjektRed community manager) and make false accusations of sexism/transphobia/homophobia/racism/alt-right/etc. You can see it all at ResetEra.*************

Also, their mods post shit like this:
https://i.imgur.com/9Jlx1bb.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/559da4j.jpg

🤢🤢🤢
 

Nome

Designer / Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,312
NYC

Zips

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,913
OP
OP
Deleted member 11093

Deleted member 11093

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,095
The fact that r/the_donald and r/braincels are still active and allowed on Reddit is fucking disgusting. Hell, this guy who posted the 100th thread on the topic is a full-blown pedo, if you check his comment history. Obviously is also an avid user of the mentioned subreddits.

Not surprised SkillUp (or his brother, whatever) is jumping on the bandwagon. I don't know why anyone give his channel, and all similar channels, the light of day. They all parrot the same stuff.
Ah, that guy is... erm.. something.

ezvdxSX.png


tgda8vZ.png
 

entrydenied

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
7,557
I'm getting a headache from all the Reddit users' nonsense.

It'll be a good thing if more devs stand up like DICE did and these people just go away.
 

Andrew Lucas

Banned
Nov 27, 2017
1,309
Would you be surprised if I told you he was a Neogaf member?
https://www./threads/show-us-your-gaming-setup-2018-edition.1460463/page-5#post-253365635

It's funny cause they call ResetEra a safe space, too political and whatnot, and links NeoGaf, a shithole that aligns with his political "views", these people are the true snowflakes.