This has gone under the radar.
I always see her name, but I have no idea what she is about?
3 weeks before the harassment group letter dropped, someone had a "blind item" tweet talking about how the assumption among journalists that _____ would be in the 2020 race was bizarre given that they had heard all the horror stories of bad management coming out from a former campaign. At the time people thought it might've been Klobuchar due to high staff turnover, but seems kinda clear it was referring to Sanders now. It's feeling like he wants to run- but the combo of 2016 issues and a bad 2020 outlook (no Hillary- no glue to try and reassemble his coalition) may mean he gets left with a D-team this go round if he does announce.
Except she's branded herself as the dove of the party since her opportunistic swap from fox news dem to bernie dem, which confuses the hell out of me. It's like she chose the most easily disprovable lie to tell.You know how everyone from all sides claimed Hillary was the Warhawk?
Tulsi is that true Warhawk.
Well, why would they want to work for Bernie in 2020 if the stories about how working for Bernie in 2016 was awful? Why would they want to go through that again?I mean yeah, but staffers leaving for Tulsi fucking Gabbard (specially when Bernie is polling 2nd) to me is symptomatic of something else going on, like people looking for whatever job they can get since the main one won't be available.
She's only a dove when it comes to Russian allies. Others, not so much.Except she's branded herself as the dove of the party since her opportunistic swap from fox news dem to bernie dem, which confuses the hell out of me. It's like she chose the most easily disprovable lie to tell.
Tulsi is the ultimate opportunist.Except she's branded herself as the dove of the party since her opportunistic swap from fox news dem to bernie dem, which confuses the hell out of me. It's like she chose the most easily disprovable lie to tell.
Hey Steve Bannon likes her maybe he'll help her campaign.
Except she's branded herself as the dove of the party since her opportunistic swap from fox news dem to bernie dem, which confuses the hell out of me. It's like she chose the most easily disprovable lie to tell.
Except she's branded herself as the dove of the party since her opportunistic swap from fox news dem to bernie dem, which confuses the hell out of me. It's like she chose the most easily disprovable lie to tell.
OP, would you put Al-Qaeda Syrian rebel devotee Harris/Gilibrand/Booker etc. in their respective thread titles when they announce?
No, because "Kirsten Gillibrand, who opposes dictators who gas their own people, announces presidential run" is a really verbose title and kind of unspoken for any candidate not named Tulsi Gabbard.OP, would you put Al-Qaeda Syrian rebel devotee Harris/Gilibrand/Booker etc. in their respective thread titles when they announce?
It's the flip side, Hawaii is a one-party state.How the fuck is she a democrat? Is her district that conservative or is she just riding her father's name?
Her family has a loooooooooooot of connections.Yes, but to keep getting elected she must get votes, and that's what I'm not getting.
The only thing that will be snatched is that old creep from Vermont's chances at the presidency
OP, would you put Al-Qaeda Syrian rebel devotee Harris/Gilibrand/Booker etc. in their respective thread titles when they announce?
You aren't clever in your 'I'm stanning for a Assad supporter' Whataboutism
Or does the 'far left' on this forum now support dictators who gas their own people?
So she'll have the tankie vote on lock or is voting too bougie for them?
You know, there's absolutely nothing wrong with opposing war with or drone strikes on Syria. We're not the world police. Also, if we're going to be tut-tutting war criminals, we should hold ourselves and our allies accountable for our own war crimes against both our own citizens and against citizens of other nations.
I think Tulsi is shit for her views on Islam and her homophobia. But I can't at all fault her for thinking attacking Syria is really stupid. Because it is. Hypocritical too.
You know, there's absolutely nothing wrong with opposing war with or drone strikes on Syria. We're not the world police. Also, if we're going to be tut-tutting war criminals, we should hold ourselves and our allies accountable for our own war crimes against both our own citizens and against citizens of other nations.
I think Tulsi is shit for her views on Islam and her homophobia. But I can't at all fault her for thinking attacking Syria is really stupid. Because it is. Hypocritical too.
Reading through the thread clearly I have.Friend I think you have radically misunderstood Gabbard's position re: attacking Syria
It's a moral obligation of mine. It may not even effect how I vote given how utterly stained basically every politician on a national level is, but I will always call out someone supporting unncecessarily violent acts of war.What motivation would there ever been in holding our politicians responsible for war crimes? When ever has America given a singular fuck about anything to hand over an american politician to the hague?
I love your idealism but man it's getting harder and harder to be optimistic about America taking responsiblity for any crimes
... ewwww.
Reading through the thread clearly I have.
But how the fuck is she a "devotee" of Assad then??? What?
It's a moral obligation of mine. It may not even effect how I vote given how utterly stained basically every politician on a national level is, but I will always call out someone supporting unncecessarily violent acts of war.
vlad has 2 horses in every race