Is there a time stamp for this? I can't find it in the written article.
I don't think that'll be the case if the CPU upgrade is worth a shit, tbh.
I have a 1060 and my game is running at 70-100 fps on high settings except shadows (1080p) This is on the 1.0 build of the game.
could be that the gameplay itself is so good that it over comes any technical issues
Why should the thread title be changed? Does the game not perform badly on Xbox?
it has its own issues but it definitely runs better than PUBG right now
I might agree if it weren't early access. Can't be as critical for its performance.
That's so sad. PUBG really needs to optimize their game.
It's this kind of thinking which will make all games companies bring out their games as "early access" games. When all games become early access games because of the free passes others are given, can we still not be be critical?
This has been something for 5 years or so.
Not if it can't even maintain a steady framerate.
LMFAO. You think they'll double the fps with patches? Well... 15 x 2 = 30. So yeah, I guess they could.
Huh?
Who said double the frame rate? And yes, I think reasonable people expect the performance to be improved to a a table 30 fps.
There are many, many early access games on steam now and it seems it is starting to cross over to console now as well. To some people, the first couple of minutes of the game being 10-15 fps can be seen as broken. And yes people want to play the game, I'm sure many do not know about the technical issues until they play it however.
Yeah, poor them. They have the hottest game of the year and it's selling nutso.
Durante did mention this might already include the optimizations on the pubg pc tests server? So that might account for that differential.
They absolutely would ..
They never said the actual words CPU limitations though. They point to the CPU being a bottleneck but also state that it will get better. They also talk about how the code utilizes PC CPUs and how it's not a good fit for today's consoles. It's clear that more focus needs to be put on CPU optimization but no one with any sense is insinuating that better performance isn't possible on these consoles.
I think it's fine to be critical but at the same time keeping in mind that it is unfinished code in an early access game. I'm not concerned about the future of the game (yet) because it's in early access but that doesn't mean I'm giving them a free pass since I do expect things to improve.
Well his original comment was regarding 60fps which you said we should wait for patches before dismissing.
It isn't much different then what their friends on PC have been playing. PUBG is all about flaws, but it's fun as hell.
No doubt that the game will improve in performance. I guess the question is, will the game improve to the point of being, at the very least, locked 30fps. Also the way it is being marketed as a "preview" game and how we are informed that the game is an unfinished product needs work.
Yeah that's not going to happen. Would give x1 owners an unfair advantage.
Assuming the next Playstation and Xbox use an ATI CPU/CPU system on a chip like the current systems they should be better since Ryzen CPUs are a lot of better than the Jaguar CPUs in the Xbox One and PS4.
Oh come on, not this shit again. Can people finally stop with this nonsense?
It's not surprising at all. PUBG is an unoptimized mess right now. I hear the build up on the pc test servers is a lot better now. Probably wise to just wait until both PC and Xbox builds are at parity, and they have had time to make some Xbox specific optimizations, before we start running around with pitchforks.
Didn't MS or the Dev confirm it was going to be 60fps though (and 30 to 45 on the base model)? Though I will surprise if it eventually is
