I didn't know that. They might have reversed the decision after yesterday's update.
No it's really not, but it has more consistent performance than the X, this is not a good look for the X.
I'd argue it's the best looking game out there, same as the previous Battlefront when that came out.
Source?
Next gen 4K shouldn't be that hard to hit, at all.
I thought John said he wouldn't be touching the game, not that DF wouldn't be. This video is by Dave.
Most of the video is X vs Pro. PC comparison starts at around 6:00. Basically it offers better tessellation and higher-res assets.
Did you watch the video? X drops the odd frame here and there he says you'd barely notice it they are pretty much on par performance wise just x has a massive iq lead and better graphical effects.
Thanks, do they mention performance at all, if it runs as great as Battlefield 1 in lower specs etc? It's crazy how good that could look on a 6 year old 7970 3GB GPU with flawless performance on really high - not Ultra - settings.
Those one or two frame drops are noticeable even on those videos, a solid stable framerate is one of the most important aspects of a multiplayer shooter, and the X falls short. The Pro isn't perfect either but it's definitely more stable.
If you watched the video you'd see the dynamic scaling is still much higher on the X.
That's his opinion, I notice framerate drops very easily and could tell even from that video.
Consoles are rushing for 4k even if it means performance sacrifices, 2-4fps drops may not seem like a lot but it's definitely noticeable, there's a reason some developers prioritise a stable framerate.
There are slight dips on both but even on X it's only to 58-59 FPS for such a short time.
That's a bold statement, mind expanding on this?
Plus much higher resolution shadows, better ambient occlusion, highre framerate and less blurry AA options (I hate TAA)
The biggest drop they showed for xbonex was 58fps. If it were higher I would agree, but for a 2 fps deficit, I'm glad they pursued higher resolution and settings.
Nope I own a G sync 144hz 1440p monitor and enjoy much higher framerates than either consoles, but again performance is much more important than resolution for me and should be for many other in a multiplayer shooter.
No word on PC performance.
A lot of their recent output has focused on the higher-end consoles, so I guess so.
It's mostly CPU fault and balance of what the dev wants to achieve.
I didn't say it wasn't ahead visually, but the performance is worse, that is bad.
