I mean, then you don't have to let that review impact your decision on whether or not to try/buy a game. That doesn't mean it shouldn't exist, or might not somehow be valuable for someone other than you.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Do you think the current pandemic should affect how reviewers rate Resident Evil 3?
- Thread starter SofNascimento
- Start date
I mean, then you don't have to let that review impact your decision on whether or not to try/buy a game. That doesn't mean it shouldn't exist, or might not somehow be valuable for someone other than you.
If anything cities in the real world will be destroyed because of the reaction of the ploiticians in charge, not because of the virus itself.
Yeah, everyone knows RE, its not like someone jumping in the "virus" wagon
But he literally said in his review that he held it against the game?
I would happily move on to another review and wouldn't bemoan its existence, I just don't think that would be particularly good practice.
since reviews are entirely subjective, the reviewer should share their own thoughts and feelings and experiences with the game
if that includes putting the game in the context of the current pandemic, then so be it, stay true to yourself
if you are unaffected by it, then, hey, don't worry about bringing it up
why y'all actin like reviews are objective lmao
if that includes putting the game in the context of the current pandemic, then so be it, stay true to yourself
if you are unaffected by it, then, hey, don't worry about bringing it up
why y'all actin like reviews are objective lmao
Because it made me feel bad. Like when I watched Parasite, I had a miserable stressful/anxious time watching that movie but I loved it even if I did not enjoy my time with it at all because thats the point and the point was well made. Some people dont like stuff that makes them feel bad becasue they feel bad.
I mean, that sounds like something that, If you were writing a critique of the movie, you could articulate without resorting to "shitting" on it.
No and if anything taking this current situation into account for a review of a game franchise that was originally made in 1996 with no awareness of this happening would just show how terrible of a reviewer they are. Sure it's a pandemic, and that's still stretching since at least in this game's timeline the issue is only isolated to raccoon city as far as we know at this time in the game's timeline. No mention of the current virus or anything(i'm certain as I haven't played the game). It would just be in very poor taste to base a review off highly unrelated current events. If people were actually turning into flesh eating zombies then I could understand concerns....but no.
Last edited:
If this game was a new franchise and begun production AFTER the Virus did the damage, then yes, it mnight have been viewed as being in bad taste, but it's a long running franchise, it has been due out for a while, and it's not really about a "disease" as such.
because most of them only care about reviews based on how they validate their own feelings and help them win internet arguments.
You're greatly reducing and under-simplifying how experience can impact how we experience something
And yes, a movie making you feel uncomfortable or tense because of your background can just as much be a point of praise. See my previous example about the new Invisible Man.
Similarly that background can make you uniquely qualified to critique a work from a perspective that others might not consider. Hence the value of personal experience and context in reviews; what might go unseen or glossed over might well be a crucial weakness in representation or a surprising strength given how it resonates
The reviewer had other issues with the game, but everyone decided to completely focus on how the virus being around was the reason he put the score at an 8, which is a great score btw.
In how they rate it, no. But if there is some interesting perspective current events can provide that are worth describing, then go ahead and include it. Write a whole piece comparing the two if it doesn't all fit in the review. I'm not sure what a cheesy horror game would have to say about a real-world pandemic, but I would happily read an article about it.
I mean if the game in some way puts the current pandemic into perspective for a reviewer, why not?
I guess It depends on what type of reviewer you want to read a game synopsis of, a personal review with personal points of experience or a more objective one with the most basic description of quality.
I prefer the basic description because I want to know if the game is for me and not how it affected the reviewer because I dont care and our life experience will be different but I understand that a more personal experience review is almost always going to be more interesting to read but I just dont care enough about how the movie/game whatever affected you because of whats going on in your life.
Exactly. To the point where it's spilling over into other discussion. And like you said - an 8 is a *great* score and it's Opencritic score is a 92. It's got some amazing accolades, but the "internet" decided to descend upon the reviewer for expressing an opinion of how it felt to play the game during a global pandemic while also critically scoring it an 8 based on how he perceived the overall quality of the game.
If a reviewer feels that the current situation has them in a mental state where it affects how they judge the game, they shouldn't review the game. Write an opinion piece on it, but not an official review. It does a disservice to the people who made the game and ultimately it wouldn't be helpful to those wanting to buy the game, especially after this pandemic is behind us.
So if playing this game made them feel sad, they shouldn't consider why they feel sad? And just give the game a low rating?
In that context, of course but don't knock a game that's been longstanding with this plot way before this current event even happened for that. If anything it's supposed to be fun and take your mind off of it. I guess it's just hard for me to fathom people having a direct correlation to our current events and this game. Now i'm sure there are people that will, but I feel there should be some capacity to separate the 2 or I guess just acknowledge it in the review or having someone else do it or not do it at all at that point if it's affecting you to the point of not being able to legitimately review the game and separate the current event's very minimal (i feel) correlation to it.
Looking at the mentioned beat review, they didn't give a bad score, just talked about how playing the game during this time period effected them. Reviews are more that the stupid score and "GAME GOOD ME LIKE" or "GAME BAD ME NO LIKE" I expect reviewers will talk about how this game relates to thee current world, and they should be able to do that if they want to. That does not mean they are going to call it a bad game or give it a bad score.
I'm not especially worried that will be the case but if reviewers feel some events has had an impact on their enjoyment of something, I don't have a problem with that. They aren't robots programmed to write objective pieces - they're merely conveying their experience with the game, so if they had a bad time, they simply had a bad time.
Lord, the only part of the review people in this thread thinks exists is the fucking score isn't? They think they only things to say about a game is if it is good or bad, not note an experience you had with it and how that could be either good or bad or simply interesting. The only way people can remotely imagine the pandemic coming up in a review is if it's used to justify a lower score, because the sore is all that matters.
This is the answer. Some reviewers will mention the current climate in their reviews, others won't. Some people enjoy that type of commentary on the reviews they read, and others don't.
Just figure out where you live on the spectrum and follow reviewers who's mindset matches your own. It's pretty simple if you ask me.
Everyone should just be robots, don't allow your human qualities to spill over into my game reviews.
I can tell none of you guys clicked on the Half Life Alyx review thread. It already happened for one review hence the OP.
There is a difference between "human qualities spilling over in my game reviews" and childish insensitive people bringing up a real virus that is killing real people while writing a review about a remake of a game with zombies in it. By all means, the dark subject matter might be too much for some people right now, it might bring their opinion down on the game. That's fine. Pass the review to someone else then or don't bother until you have a clear head. These reviewers aren't the only people going through hardship right. For most of us, this game is an escape from the real world because we aren't blinded by the most shallow of connections between a real and fake outbreak. A game review should not be a platform for someone to share their sorrow and that sorrow should not be doing a disservice to the media in question. Write a personal blog if you got something to get off your chest.
Game reviews arent the place for the shallow observations and metaphors that reviewers will pry out of a game that was made completely outside of our current crisis. Save that for the "blog post" opinion articles a month or two later so you can spend some time researching your points or sharpening your arguments.
Same shit will happen with TLOU2
Same shit will happen with TLOU2
So anyone who even dares to imagine a link between a fictional virus outbreak and a real life one is childish and insensitive. Let's forget cultural and societal context when talking about media and art. In fact, don't even let them review the game, don't want societal issues or politics touching our game reviews or their precious metascores.
Jesus, this forum sometimes. People's standards for reviews are both incredibly low and super specific...
Nope, just into idiots
People like him were already idiots.
The Half Life: Alyx review that docked points due to "parallels" to our current situation is absolutely fucking absurd.
It is absurd for a reviewers of anything to draw comparisons to real-world events and deduct points from the review as a result. This same thing could occur when The Last of Us Part II releases in May.
I say get the fuck out of here. It is fiction. We need stories, now more than ever. And reviewers who cannot objectively differentiate art from a cruel reality should reexamine their profession.
Resident Evil 3's review should have no bearing on our current situation whatsoever. And any review that considers this differently is idiotic.
It is absurd for a reviewers of anything to draw comparisons to real-world events and deduct points from the review as a result. This same thing could occur when The Last of Us Part II releases in May.
I say get the fuck out of here. It is fiction. We need stories, now more than ever. And reviewers who cannot objectively differentiate art from a cruel reality should reexamine their profession.
Resident Evil 3's review should have no bearing on our current situation whatsoever. And any review that considers this differently is idiotic.
It's not really an outbreak in the same way at all though. It is a bio terror attack on one city and the game is mostly about running away from a tentacle monster. It doesn't deal with stuff like being quarantined and things like that.
It would be like criticizing splatoon for connecting to climate change since the setting is way in ths future after a global warming apocalypse.
I'm aware of that, but there are obviously some overt similarities, the main one being the breakout of a disease with deserted streets.
I also don't necessarily agree that this would affect me but there are those whose experience in-game might be affected by the current real world situation. Mentioning it and saying that also doesn't mean it will affect the review negatively. It might even possibly affect it positively in a weird way. But people saying that reviewers should be robotic to the situation aren't seeing the forest for the trees.
I don't see how the current pandemic relates to a work of fiction, I trust reviewers can separate fact from fiction.
What is it that you think reviews are, if not opinion pieces??
Lmao why does this forum have an entirely different culture in threads related to reviews than it does everywhere else? It's so weird.
Not understanding the premise of this thread.
The real life virus is irrelevant to a videogame one.
The real life virus is irrelevant to a videogame one.
If the game actually has something to say, then yes, but in this case the answer would be no.
Zombie outbreak in Resident Evil is just that, it's not some commentary or trying to draw parallel to Covid-19.
Zombie outbreak in Resident Evil is just that, it's not some commentary or trying to draw parallel to Covid-19.
