Hold your horses OP. Per Wiki:Going through the AFI's greatest 100 American movies list and got to this not realizing who he was. So this guy made a movie about intolerance a year after making a movie glorifying the KKK? Pretty mind blowing.
It was not, however, an apology, as Griffith felt he had nothing to apologize for;[4]in numerous interviews, Griffith made clear that the film's title and overriding themes were meant as a response to those who he felt had been intolerant of him in condemning The Birth of a Nation.
Yeah, I learned a lot about Griffith while getting my Minor in Media Arts. The guy was a brilliant technical director, but he supposedly was taken aback at efforts to censor his work, and when Intolerance bombed in the box office, he was financially and mentally ruined. None of his future pictures would be as good as Intolerance, nor would any make the kind of money he made with The Birth of a Nation. He remained a household name with regards to the Hollywood directors and superstars of the time, but he was quickly forgotten by the average moviegoers.
Why is it a shame? That movie revived America's #1 terrorist organization. He deserves it, fuck him and his mama.It's a shame that he is forever tainted by Birth of a Nation, because Intolerance is actually pretty damn good.
It is. The film is "why are you Blacks picking on me? Waaaaaaah. You guys are so intolerant, I make movie they can learn from!"I was under the impression that Birth of a Nation is a racist ass movie and Intolerance is akin to guy screaming SJW is out to censor him over his racist ass movie
LOL This is good to hear. He should have telegram'd the Klan his GoFundMe address.Yeah, I learned a lot about Griffith while getting my Minor in Media Arts. The guy was a brilliant technical director, but he supposedly was taken aback at efforts to censor his work, and when Intolerance bombed in the box office, he was financially and mentally ruined. None of his future pictures would be as good as Intolerance, nor would any make the kind of money he made with The Birth of a Nation. He remained a household name with regards to the Hollywood directors and superstars of the time, but he was quickly forgotten by the average moviegoers.
Why is it a shame? That movie revived America's #1 terrorist organization. He deserves it, fuck him and his mama.
Ah, Intolerance. Arguably the best American movie ever made, and one of the form's most profound cris de coeurs. Griffith was a master of the art. But yes, he took the wrong side of history.
That was Broken BlossomsYou mean the movie in which the main character does Asian face I don't know what you call it I don't know what you call it was really bad.
The KKK had no interest in him. Despite the reason for it's creation, Intolerance wasn't a film they wanted. It was a film beloved and respected and enjoyed by the Hollywood elites and no one else. He was essentially undone by The Birth of a Nation, and he never recovered from it's success. Karma is a bitch.LOL This is good to hear. He should have telegram'd the Klan his GoFundMe address.
That may have been the motivation for making the film but I think it's hardly apparent in the actual content of the film. It's not really about intolerance towards racism.Yep, he made Intolerance after Birth of a Nation in response to what he thought was intolerance to his racist beliefs. A lot of people, even at the time, hated Birth of a Nation and thought it was overtly racist. DW Griffith apparently had no idea people would think a movie starring the KKK would be seen as hateful. So, in shock, he makes an even bigger more ludicrous epic about how mean people were to him and his racist beliefs.
The Birth of a Nation is really only worth watching / owning if you're a film historian.Great movie.
Don't think I can ever watch Birth of a Nation though. More so after having seen Black Klansman.
Going by accounts of people who knew him, Griffith was a dope who did not have any kind of politically-minded sensibilities. Which is not to say he wasn't racist of course, but I think Birth of a Nation was him regurgitating stories he grew up with, without any thought as to what this film was going to do in the real world.Yep, he made Intolerance after Birth of a Nation in response to what he thought was intolerance to his racist beliefs. A lot of people, even at the time, hated Birth of a Nation and thought it was overtly racist. DW Griffith apparently had no idea people would think a movie starring the KKK would be seen as hateful. So, in shock, he makes an even bigger more ludicrous epic about how mean people were to him and his racist beliefs.
I mean, The Birth of a Nation was based on a book and play. The play was very successful. I honestly doubt Griffith really put any real thought into it beyond that, given what I learned about his politics (or general lack of interest in politics).Going by accounts of people who knew him, Griffith was a dope who did not have any kind of politically-minded sensibilities. Not to say he isn't racist, but I think his attachment to Birth of a Nation was fueled by his regurgitating stories he grew up with.
The Birth of a Nation is really only worth watching / owning if you're a film historian.