Bad example, because that "bionic" prosthetic is historically accurate.Anyone who is looking for "historical accuracy" in a game with bionic prosthetics has instantly revealed that they don't actually care about historical accuracy.
Good, maybe they actually stay away. Maybe just maybe there will be less neo Nazi edgelords on PC this time... Ah who am I kidding, just like BF1 it will be filled with Holocaust denying trolls stinking up the chat.
Good response regardless.
Bad example, because that "bionic" prosthetic is historically accurate.
This.
While I won't argue for or against lootboxes, their Star Wars games are amazing graphical and gameplay-wise (except for maybe TOR, but I'm not sure that's EA). Also, while I'm not a fan of sports games, I know people who play FIFA games and think they're amazing. They clearly try to improve upon them year after year, too. What's cookie cutter about that?EA is such a weird company.
They do things like this that have us singing praises, then they turn around and shit all over their Star Wars exclusive license or pump out cookie cutter sports games or test heinous lootbox implementations.
Oh I see.It's more something the line of, "something something I can't identify with someone who doesn't look exactly like me something something".
These are people who are uneducated — they don't understand that this is a plausible scenario, and listen: this is a game,
I don't think they're doing anything more than laughing at these losers.It must be really frustrating for the devs when they put their heart and soul into it and then have to deal with a bunch of sexist crybabies trying to trigger start a dumbass hashtag.