• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Oct 27, 2017
13,464
The game, titled OpenSC2K, was released on GitHub earlier this year and received quite a bit of attention on sites such as Reddit and Hacker News.

While it is billed as an "open source" version, the remake did include original artwork, belonging to Electronic Arts. These images and sounds are definitely not free to use, something the developer is fully aware of now.

A few days ago Electronic Arts sent a DMCA takedown notice to GitHub asking the platform to remove the infringing repository from its site.

"Assets from the game SimCity 2000 are being infringed upon," EA writes. The company points out that the game can be purchased legally through Origin where it's still being sold for a few dollars.

While OpenSC2K is far from a full remake, Electronic Arts makes it clear that the SimCity 2000 assets are not for public use.

"The current audiovisual output of the repository creates content that infringes on Electronic Arts copyright. As long as that continues to happen, no other changes other than removal is sufficient to address the infringement," the company writes.

Soon after this DMCA notice was submitted, OpenSC2K was indeed taken offline, replaced with GitHub's standard DMCA notification.

This is also the reason why the developer came up with an asset conversion tool early on. That would make it possible to replace the original artwork with open source content, however, due to some code changes and other priorities, this hasn't happened yet.

"The assets are not freely licensed but are currently being included. I have a working asset conversion tool that can pull the original game art from the game files, but I've since pushed out a complete rewrite of the engine that broke a few things," the developer wrote.
https://torrentfreak.com/ea-takes-down-open-source-simcity-2000-remake-180730/
 

MattWilsonCSS

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,349
This seems like a simple fix by changing the art assets, or requiring that you own the original game and supply the files yourself, as some engines do.
 
Oct 29, 2017
5,354
Open-source remakes typically sidestep this by requiring users to supply an existing official installation of the original game, and have the remake code go and pull the assets from that install. That way they're not distributing the copyrighted assets despite using them in the code.

Looks like these guys made an amateur mistake.

EDIT: According to the very last sentence in the OP's quote, this was known already but the guy was like "idk lol", I guess not believing EA would go after him? Yeah, kinda dumb tbh
 

Garlador

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
14,131
EA should make a proper SimCity.

Heh.
c5f.gif
 

elenarie

Game Developer
Verified
Jun 10, 2018
9,779
As an example on how to do this properly, take a look at OpenTTD or OpenRCT2. These games still require the original assets from legitimate copies, or community-developed assets as replacements.
 

Pargon

Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,970
Hopefully all this means is that the developer has to remove the copyrighted material and build in support for loading the game's original data files, rather than shutting down the project.
The company points out that the game can be purchased legally through Origin where it's still being sold for a few dollars.
It's worth pointing out that this is the DOS version of SimCity 2000 packaged with DOSBox, not the Windows version of the game.
It's not the only game like this either - Dungeon Keeper is also the DOS version rather than the Windows version.
 

Jessie

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,921
It's really dumb how they didn't mandate the original game, or used original files. Come on guys. Learn from the other Open devs.
 

chrominance

Sky Van Gogh
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,543
Yeah, this is kind of surprising. And I feel like they must've had an inkling that this would be an issue, since they made a tool that apparently converts the assets from the original game for use in OpenSC2K. If it wasn't ready, they should've just waited until it was and released the code without the infringing assets.

This feels like they skipped classes for Fan Remake 101. Other projects have been shut down for way less.