Easy Allies |OT2| Love & Reset

AppleKid · Mar 9, 2019

Nakenorm said:
What, what's wrong with Ian?

Nothing specific to Ian, I just prefer the podcast to remain focused on the panel for that week and their thoughts. I like the rotating 2 (occassionally 3) seats and the different panel dynamics that creates, but with Ian increasingly contributing it starts to make it feel more like a 5 man podcast with 3 regulars. Whenever it cuts to his camera or I hear him cutting in from off-screen it interrupts the flow of the podcast for me. Really boils down to personal preference on structure (shrug)

TheDarkKnight said:
I thought the opposite. The one are where things dragged in an otherwise great ep was having Damiani look up his own prove it ticket challenge instead of having Ian handing it all and keeping things moving smoother.

Oh, I am very pleased with the way Ian streamlines processes like this. It's the interruptions of group discussion I don't like. I'd like to hear his thoughts on things, but as a member of the panel rather than the camera operator who occasionally interjects.

Tetsujin · Mar 9, 2019

Slim Action said:
Neighbors having a screaming match outside Huber's window, lol

Totally thought it was outside my window at first until I realized they were speaking English, haha

Nakenorm · Mar 9, 2019

Tetsujin said:
Totally thought it was outside my window at first until I realized they were speaking English, haha

Me as well actually haha. I live on the first floor so it's not that unusual actually. Had someone shoot at some windows across the streer a while back even.

ZeoVGM · Mar 9, 2019

AppleKid said:
Nothing specific to Ian, I just prefer the podcast to remain focused on the panel for that week and their thoughts. I like the rotating 2 (occassionally 3) seats and the different panel dynamics that creates, but with Ian increasingly contributing it starts to make it feel more like a 5 man podcast with 3 regulars. Whenever it cuts to his camera or I hear him cutting in from off-screen it interrupts the flow of the podcast for me. Really boils down to personal preference on structure (shrug)

Oh, I am very pleased with the way Ian streamlines processes like this. It's the interruptions of group discussion I don't like. I'd like to hear his thoughts on things, but as a member of the panel rather than the camera operator who occasionally interjects.

Just to throw out my own opinion here: I 100% diagree.

I want Ian jumping in as he does now.

Slim Action · Mar 9, 2019

Ian is great, I love his current role(s) on the podcast.

Faintcolt388301 · Mar 9, 2019

ZeoVGM said:
Just to throw out my own opinion here: I 100% diagree.

I want Ian jumping in as he does now.

I share this same sentiment. I love Ian. I think he brings a ton of value. His perspective is often very different than the rest of the main group, much like Don, so I enjoy hearing from him. If anything, give us more Ian.

spman2099 · Mar 9, 2019

AppleKid said:
Nothing specific to Ian, I just prefer the podcast to remain focused on the panel for that week and their thoughts. I like the rotating 2 (occassionally 3) seats and the different panel dynamics that creates, but with Ian increasingly contributing it starts to make it feel more like a 5 man podcast with 3 regulars. Whenever it cuts to his camera or I hear him cutting in from off-screen it interrupts the flow of the podcast for me. Really boils down to personal preference on structure (shrug)

Yeah, those aren't interruptions, dude; Ian IS part of the panel. The podcast does have three regulars, Ian is one of them. Personally, I would be really sad if Ian wasn't giving his input anymore. I think that would hurt the podcast deeply. Him manning the switchboard has been such a fantastic change for the podcast. I couldn't disagree more with you.

AppleKid · Mar 9, 2019

Haha welp, guess I am in the minority on this one. Don't envision his input being reduced anyway so feel you guys will at least continue getting the dynamic you enjoy

spman2099 said:
Ian IS part of the panel.

This I am curious about though. Not that it matters, but is this considered official? For example when Bosman says sth like "question to the panel" is it generally considered he is posing this question to Ian as well?

Hazz3r · Mar 9, 2019

I also think that Ian very rarely says anything in comparison to how much the rest of the panel contributes, and even when he does, "Interrupting" is the last thing I'd call it! He often waits until the very last second to give his take on a topic. He's certainly got more willpower than I have to not rush in to a conversation that I have an opinion on.

Deleted member 176 · Mar 9, 2019

AppleKid said:
Haha welp, guess I am in the minority on this one. Don't envision his input being reduced anyway so feel you guys will at least continue getting the dynamic you enjoy

This I am curious about though. Not that it matters, but is this considered official? For example when Bosman says sth like "question to the panel" is it generally considered he is posing this question to Ian as well?

If you never watched GT time it may seem like a lot more to you than it does to the rest of us

spman2099 · Mar 9, 2019

Hazz3r said:
I also think that Ian very rarely says anything in comparison to how much the rest of the panel contributes, and even when he does, "Interrupting" is the last thing I'd call it! He often waits until the very last second to give his take on a topic. He's certainly got more willpower than I have to not rush in to a conversation that I have an opinion on.

Indeed. More often than not someone has to specifically coax something out of him. That is how you know questions are being addressed to him as well, because if he doesn't give his take Kyle will often ask for it.

antennastoheaven · Mar 9, 2019

If anything I wished they had someone else on the switcher from time to time. Maybe Don or Damiani (the first was on the switcher sometimes on GT Time, Damiani because he's controlling the stream computer usually so maybe he could learn switching too). Then we could get Ian at the table. Or have a backup switcher.

kamen_tater · Mar 9, 2019

Early EZ update this week. Ian plays FTL solitaire board game.

Servbot24 · Mar 9, 2019

AppleKid said:
Nothing specific to Ian, I just prefer the podcast to remain focused on the panel for that week and their thoughts. I like the rotating 2 (occassionally 3) seats and the different panel dynamics that creates, but with Ian increasingly contributing it starts to make it feel more like a 5 man podcast with 3 regulars. Whenever it cuts to his camera or I hear him cutting in from off-screen it interrupts the flow of the podcast for me. Really boils down to personal preference on structure (shrug)

Oh, I am very pleased with the way Ian streamlines processes like this. It's the interruptions of group discussion I don't like. I'd like to hear his thoughts on things, but as a member of the panel rather than the camera operator who occasionally interjects.

Gotta say I super disagree. Ian chiming in is a delight and helps shake things up

Remember Me · Mar 10, 2019

I miss Ian as a desk panelist, but he's job witch the switcher (and not just the switcher) is great and I love every time he jumps in, I'd like he did it more.

Razgriz-Specter · Mar 10, 2019

Yo Huber with that Star Wars Galaxies call out in the podcast,
best MMO of all time

Deleted member 4976 · Mar 10, 2019

I do sort of agree in the sense that I'd love for Ian to be on the table actual from time to time.

stan_marsh · Mar 10, 2019

Please Ian on the table more.
I'll up my pledge lmao

jett · Mar 10, 2019

I personally agree that I'd like to see Ian on the table again

Dysun · Mar 10, 2019

I always liked Ian as the 5th member on the Podcast. I would prefer he stay on the switcher, but feel free to chime in more

TheDarkKnight · Mar 10, 2019

Can we also get Don on the switcher like he did once or twice in the GT Time days?

The Third Heat · Mar 11, 2019

TheDarkKnight said:
Can we also get Don on the switcher like he did once or twice in the GT Time days?

I second this, but I think as long as they keep filming the podcast prior to the group stream, this won't happen because Funhaus.

Cursed Funhaus ruining everything.

But yeah, Ian at the table every once in a while would be nice.

MrMette · Mar 11, 2019

The Third Heat said:
I second this, but I think as long as they keep filming the podcast prior to the group stream, this won't happen because Funhaus.

Cursed Funhaus ruining everything.

But yeah, Ian at the table every once in a while would be nice.

I believe they always filmed the podcast after the groupstream (but maybe that changed in the studio?)
But it's still a valid point that it likely won't happen because of Funhaus (even though it's not really Funhauses fault).

Bloodworth · Mar 11, 2019

MrMette said:
I believe they always filmed the podcast after the groupstream (but maybe that changed in the studio?)
But it's still a valid point that it likely won't happen because of Funhaus (even though it's not really Funhauses fault).

Podcast is before group stream now to avoid picking up the loud music from the bar downstairs. We'll still shoot some extra things later like Previews and Huber Syndrome if there isn't time before.

The King beyond the wall · Mar 11, 2019

AppleKid said:
Nothing specific to Ian, I just prefer the podcast to remain focused on the panel for that week and their thoughts. I like the rotating 2 (occassionally 3) seats and the different panel dynamics that creates, but with Ian increasingly contributing it starts to make it feel more like a 5 man podcast with 3 regulars. Whenever it cuts to his camera or I hear him cutting in from off-screen it interrupts the flow of the podcast for me. Really boils down to personal preference on structure (shrug)

Oh, I am very pleased with the way Ian streamlines processes like this. It's the interruptions of group discussion I don't like. I'd like to hear his thoughts on things, but as a member of the panel rather than the camera operator who occasionally interjects.

I could not disagree any more. Ian on the switcher has been a tremendous improvement for the Podcast - he not only gives the Podcast a more dynamic feel but also provides research and fact-checks when necessary and always has an interesting and different interpretation and view on news stories when he does offer his input. The result is a Podcast that feels much more focused, knowledgeable, well-rounded and generally a better produced product.

Tregard · Mar 11, 2019

Absolutely cannot wait to hear the Allies speculate wildly on Google's console.

Tygre · Mar 11, 2019

I'd missed Ian chiming in from the switcher ever since the death of GT.

Bringing that vibe back to the podcast has been awesome, Ian is the 5th chair.

Karu · Mar 11, 2019

Ian at the switcher makes EZA complete.

It has been a long time coming back when they bought the switcher, and I am truly happy he is a mainstay on the podcast. Also have to sign the earlier comment by The king beyond the wall - it does enhance the liveliness of the podcast, and while it may seem like it could break the natural flow - it usually does with good reason, rarely does it hamper the quality, it is part of the unique flow imo. :=)

Tankard · Mar 11, 2019

Could only watch the latest EZA podcast yesterday.

Kudos on Kyle for bringing the THQ discussion back and a lot more informed this time.
My opinion is the same as Huber's. Just had to fire those guys and act like they care.

Deleted member 437 · Mar 11, 2019

Wow, the patreon really grinded to a halt.

Hasney · Mar 11, 2019

Mikey Jr. said:
Wow, the patreon really grinded to a halt.

Not really. The sponsor slots just re-filled up early in the month and this is the new normal until there's more spoiler modes.

Urbannomad123 · Mar 11, 2019

Hasney said:
Not really. The sponsor slots just re-filled up early in the month and this is the new normal until there's more spoiler modes.

Does anyone know when we are likely to get the next Patreon exclusive show? That would probably move things along a bit also. A second season of For That Reason would be very welcome.

Xenoboy · Mar 11, 2019

Still waiting for a Love & Respect game show. That's actually what I would have preferred the game show to be

Tregard · Mar 11, 2019

Xenoboy said:
Still waiting for a Love & Respect game show. That's actually what I would have preferred the game show to be

Feels like a good fit for the Live Show when it happens. Make them work like little chat show segments.

Maybe the next series should be Allies playing board games. "Easy Allies: Unplugged"

Whatever it may be, I imagine we'll see something about it at Mysterious Monster Mash

AllThingsPurple · Mar 11, 2019

Tregard said:
Feels like a good fit for the Live Show when it happens. Make them work like little chat show segments.

Maybe the next series should be Allies playing board games. "Easy Allies: Unplugged"

I'd be well up for something board game related

Mattersnotnow · Mar 11, 2019

Tregard said:
Feels like a good fit for the Live Show when it happens. Make them work like little chat show segments.

Maybe the next series should be Allies playing board games. "Easy Allies: Unplugged"

Whatever it may be, I imagine we'll see something about it at Mysterious Monster Mash

Them doing board games is the thing I most wanted to see how well they'd gel with. Specially hidden traitor games like Battlestar Galactica, Dead of Winter...

Deleted member 437 · Mar 11, 2019

Hasney said:
Not really. The sponsor slots just re-filled up early in the month and this is the new normal until there's more spoiler modes.

Patron wise?

Hasney · Mar 11, 2019

Mikey Jr. said:
Patron wise?

Yeah, because of cycles, you can only look at it month by month and they're 242 better off than they were this time last month. And that's with 0 spoiler modes so far in March. Pretty good going.

Tregard · Mar 11, 2019

Old repost as a limited run show idea:

Any thoughts as to what the next Limited Run series is going to be? I personally hope it's "Sensible Drivers", a show in which Brandon acts as a driving instructor taking the other Allies on their driving test, using various games as the testing ground (GTA, Simpsons Hit & Run, Forza Horizon etc.).

Hasney · Mar 11, 2019

Whatever the next series is, I'm guessing it will be announced at the concert/anniversary livestream thingy

EDIT: I don't think the anniversary non-stage stream is confirmed yet, but Jones has mentioned it on CoJ before.

issa · Mar 11, 2019

Glad they ended the "talent" conversation. It's the same argument that leads to witch hunting specific developers.

Urbannomad123 · Mar 11, 2019

For those that watched Friend Code I hope Blood Verdict becomes a thing. With the help of Kyle and others that could easily be worked into a pretty cool limited run series.

MrMette · Mar 11, 2019

Urbannomad123 said:
For those that watched Friend Code I hope Blood Verdict becomes a thing. With the help of Kyle and others that could easily be worked into a pretty cool limited run series.

I agree. It sounds like a cool idea.

Axass · Mar 11, 2019

I don't think we should expect many announcements at the anniversary event this year, Jones has said as much in CoJ, still I hope we at least get one retro and something else.

If they don't give a date for the next retro, they might as well take retrospectives out of the Patreon goals, honestly I wouldn't care anymore, EZA isn't GT, and if abandoning retros gives them time for new, interesting projects, I'm all for it.

klastical · Mar 11, 2019

Axass said:
I don't think we should expect many announcements at the anniversary event this year, Jones has said as much in CoJ, still I hope we at least get one retro and something else.

If they don't give a date for the next retro, they might as well take retrospectives out of the Patreon goals, honestly I wouldn't care anymore, EZA isn't GT, and if abandoning retros gives them time for new, interesting projects, I'm all for it.

I'm with you as well. Retros just dont seem like they are worth the raw man hours they take to pull off. I would much rather see it replaced with something they can deliver with more regularity.

Hasney · Mar 11, 2019

klastical said:
I'm with you as well. Retros just dont seem like they are worth the raw man hours they take to pull off. I would much rather see it replaced with something they can deliver with more regularity.

The way Jones has talked about it on CoJ right now is that there's a couple on the go, but it's one person on each and just doing it when they have other downtime. It sounds like even if it is removed, it's not going to be replaced with much and specifically not something with a schedule.

sora87 · Mar 11, 2019

We've had 2 retros in 3 years, think it should have been taken off as a patreon tier a while ago tbh

Xenoboy · Mar 11, 2019

they should just say what one of them is at point, considering they have several in the works. They are already late for what's supposed to be something they should put out.

LycanXIII · Mar 11, 2019

I understand why they don't want to publicly post about upcoming Retros, but CoJ is where they should be talked about. Same for Game Sleuth.
"A, B, and C are working on this, this, and this. Currently at this step. Release is not known, in a few months/weeks, imminent."
Don't have to say what they are about, but at least acknowledge that the Patreon goal that has been met is being worked on.

MrMette · Mar 11, 2019

I understand the sentiment about taking down the Retro Patreon tier and I would personally be fine with it even though I love retros and I hope they continue to produce them (and I don't really care that it's a tier and they don't produce them too often), but there is a chance there will be backlash if they do as you can be certain not everybody will agree that removing that tier is a good idea. Hopefully there won't be too much drops in their Patreon if they decide to remove the thier.

Easy Allies |OT2| Love & Reset

Unshakable Resolve

User requested account closure

Community Resettler

One Winged Slayer

One Winged Slayer

One Winged Slayer

One Winged Slayer