I see what you're saying, but for me, Don't Skips are a chance to shine a spotlight on games they feel don't get the attention they deserve. And I'd argue that despite being Final Fantasy games, 8 and 12 aren't generally as well-regarded as other games in the franchise. Ben simply wanted to counter that perception and express his thoughts on why they deserve a second chance, hence the Don't Skips. I think they're a cool vehicle for any Ally to just praise a game they love. I wish we got more of them.I don't know how I feel about semi popular games getting don't skips. At least with Bully it's somewhat okay since it's kinda lesser known overall I think, but like I dunno why FF8 or FF12 had one
I don't know how I feel about semi popular games getting don't skips. At least with Bully it's somewhat okay since it's kinda lesser known overall I think, but like I dunno why FF8 or FF12 had one
I never thought I would say this, but I can't wait for the Episode IX Spoiler Mode. The review thread is delicious
It'll definitely be interesting, considering the spread of opinions on VIII.I never thought I would say this, but I can't wait for the Episode IX Spoiler Mode. The review thread is delicious
That's right, but the question and the point of us doubting that is, will he even go there ? He is so convinced about the Elite Four being the only thing that is left, that I assume that it will take Kyle to tell him that there is something left to do, after he defeats the Elite Four
That's right, but the question and the point of us doubting that is, will he even go there ? He is so convinced about the Elite Four being the only thing that is left, that I assume that it will take Kyle to tell him that there is something left to do, after he defeats the Elite Four
Totally agree with this. Comcept is gpod but execution is kinda offSo not sure how I feel about Prison of Love so far. The first episode was probably the strongest one since it was focused on a game Kyle genuinely didn't care for.
Since then we've had Jones playing Sabatour which he never even played before and the newest episode is Ian playing X-Men Origins Wolverine.
The problem with the last two episodes (Ian's episode especially) are, not only are they kind of not following the concept of the show, but Huber just kind of chats about Jones's love for open world games. And with Ian, just chatting about his problem with cinematic games in general, barely even talking about the game Ian is playing.
The show is entertaining don't get me wrong, but it feels like it's unfocused and has been straying from the concept that they put forth for the show. Hopefully we get more episodes closer to Kyle's episode.
Completely agree. I'm really enjoying the show because I love Huber showing a game to one of the other Allies and trying to get them to like it, but the concept does not match what's actually happening.So not sure how I feel about Prison of Love so far. The first episode was probably the strongest one since it was focused on a game Kyle genuinely didn't care for.
Since then we've had Jones playing Sabatour which he never even played before and the newest episode is Ian playing X-Men Origins Wolverine.
The problem with the last two episodes (Ian's episode especially) are, not only are they kind of not following the concept of the show, but Huber just kind of chats about Jones's love for open world games. And with Ian, just chatting about his problem with cinematic games in general, barely even talking about the game Ian is playing.
The show is entertaining don't get me wrong, but it feels like it's unfocused and has been straying from the concept that they put forth for the show. Hopefully we get more episodes closer to Kyle's episode.
Huber's Prison of Love
Is there a game one of us hates, but Huber absolutely adores? Huber will lock us in a room and force us to play that game with him. Will he woo us to his side? Only time will tell. Episodes will come out every other week, alternating seasons with Huber Syndrome.
Learn to constructively criticise or stop posting dude.Three episodes in. Two of those have been games that they've never played, and one of them was a game that the Ally only dislikes one particular aspect about.
Trash show.
Three episodes in. Two of those have been games that they've never played, and one of them was a game that the Ally only dislikes one particular aspect about.
Trash show.
This. Like, why did they not play The Last of Us. That's the obvious pick surely.A better game for Ian to play would be The Last of Us, heck they even talked about it in that very episode.
You have to go that way to get to the Elite 4. The victory road and the league is the same location as the one in red and blue. Once you beat it the Professor straight up tells you, you can go challenge all the Kanto Gyms now. Unless he's stupid, which he isn't, he will figure it out by himself.
That's not how jokes work.It was a joke because Ian called film games trash.
Jesus fucking Christ!
How is that a joke? It is a trash show so far.It was a joke because Ian called film games trash.
Jesus fucking Christ!
I'm really trying for Huber's sake but I'm two episodes in to Life is Strange 2 and I'm just kinda... bored.
That's not how jokes work.
Going through it as well, though I seem to be getting more out of it than you are. I'm trying my best, but I'm slowly ruining this kid. It stresses me out.I'm really trying for Huber's sake but I'm two episodes in to Life is Strange 2 and I'm just kinda... bored.
Jesus h christ people are so fucking rude about living breathing human beings
Offer constructive criticism not bitching about it being shitty
EZA Era is only one step behind reddit for being an awful EZA community
Because they have their real names and faces attached to their negative opinions, e.g. they're giving their take but staking some personal reputation on the line to give it.Why is it perfectly acceptable for a member of Easy Allies to call something "trash" but it's a complete no no to call something they do "trash"
OK I have my real name as a username over here. Prison of Love is trash. Its still a fun show to watch but when it comes to what it was promised to be, it's trash. No need to worry though, I'm sure if there is season 2 Huber will retool it or retool the purpose of the show.Because they have their real names and faces attached to their negative opinions, e.g. they're giving their take but staking some personal reputation on the line to give it.
Meanwhile, people like yourself voice their negative opinions with no repercussions under the guise of a fictional character's headwear
Trash is way too strong of a word for a show that is, in your own words, fun to watch, but doesn't follow its concept like it should. If it's a fun show, then it's not trash. You can just say you're disappointed (or even hate) that it doesn't follow the concept, and most people would agree with you. Instead, it's "trash," a term that has no redeeming nor constructive value.OK I have my real name as a username over here. Prison of Love is trash. Its still a fun show to watch but when it comes to what it was promised to be, it's trash. No need to worry though, I'm sure if there is season 2 Huber will retool it or retool the purpose of the show.
You misunderstand my point -- even if your real name is attached to an opinion, you don't have a *reputation* that you're staking on your take. You're shouting mean things without consequence whether or not you're attaching your name to it, because the fact of the matter is that even with a real name attached to your opinion, you're still functionally anonymous if you have no reputation.OK I have my real name as a username over here. Prison of Love is trash. Its still a fun show to watch but when it comes to what it was promised to be, it's trash. No need to worry though, I'm sure if there is season 2 Huber will retool it or retool the purpose of the show.
Trash is way too strong of a word for a show that is, in your own words, fun to watch, but doesn't follow its concept like it should. If it's a fun show, then it's not trash. You can just say you're disappointed (or even hate) that it doesn't follow the concept, and most people would agree with you. Instead, it's "trash," a term that has no redeeming nor constructive value.
I think you guys are missing the point. Ian uses the word trash to describe things he doesn't like. Yet we would all agree he's not being toxic or hateful on things. The point it people use different words to express themselves and attach different meanings to them. If Ian can be given the benefit of the doubt then the poster who clearly stated that his post was in jest can be as well.You misunderstand my point -- even if your real name is attached to an opinion, you don't have a *reputation* that you're staking on your take. You're shouting mean things without consequence whether or not you're attaching your name to it, because the fact of the matter is that even with a real name attached to your opinion, you're still functionally anonymous if you have no reputation.
Anyway: I like Prison of Love, it's a good show. Well, at least the Bosman and Jones episodes were, I haven't watched #3 yet. I have no idea what it was "promised to be", so maybe that's why I like it(???)
The concept of it was taking a game one of the allies hates but Huber loves, and he tries to convince them to love the game too. So it already started a little weird, since Kyle likes 3D World, but at least he hates co-op in platforming, so there was still that thing in the game that Huber was trying to turn Kyle around on. In episode 2, Huber showed Brandon The Saboteur, a game that not only Brandon doesn't hate, but hasn't even played. So it already abandoned the concept all together and Huber just tries to get him to enjoy an open world game he hasn't tried before? In episode 3, same thing basically. A game Ian has never played nor has any opinion on. Especially weird since the theme of the episode was cinematic games, and there's already a perfect game that is both cinematic AND that Ian dislikes while Huber loves: The Last of Us.You misunderstand my point -- even if your real name is attached to an opinion, you don't have a *reputation* that you're staking on your take. You're shouting mean things without consequence whether or not you're attaching your name to it, because the fact of the matter is that even with a real name attached to your opinion, you're still functionally anonymous if you have no reputation.
Anyway: I like Prison of Love, it's a good show. Well, at least the Bosman and Jones episodes were, I haven't watched #3 yet. I have no idea what it was "promised to be", so maybe that's why I like it(???)