This is a good idea and I would be in.Is there an ERA league for fantasy critic? If not, should we start one?
Is there an ERA league for fantasy critic? If not, should we start one?
I think he'd be more stoked if the Giants were going, but yes, I'm sure he's excited about this too.Cant imagine how stoked bosman is right now. Mahomes is going to the superbowl!
well because they only choose 8, and this time had the list of big games right in front of themI feel they went a bit too safe honestly, IMO it's more fun to pick more actual outsiders.
Also, Assassin's Creed was definitely a good counterpick.
well because they only choose 8, and this time had the list of big games right in front of them
and there's only 3 in the league.
ignoring some of the sure hitters wouldn't be that smart.
Maybe if they chose like 12 and draft 6 it would address your concern?
i feel like there should be more of a reward for picking games that aren't expected to be great but i guess that's hard to do. fantasy sports works because they keep performing over the season, here it is just a one time thing and most things land between 80-89 anyway. maybe some sort of bonus if it isn't a sequel of a 80+ game or something like that.
the way to win here is just picking up as many ultra safe games as possible.
Easy Update 2020 Fantasy Critic ep. was a blast.
I'd be spending a significant amount of $Don Bucks$ to pick up Dreams ASAP if I were any one of them.
I know this isn't a strict schedule or anything but TLOU2 is coming out on the 29th of May, so it'll be more of a June game.For me it's looking like:
January: get around to finishing Outer Wilds and some other backlog stuff
February: replay Fire Emblem Three Houses when all the DLC is out
March (?): Black Mesa full release (plus I'll go back through the other Half-Life/Portal games)
March or whenever it gets delayed to: Half-Life Alyx
March 20: Doom Eternal
April: RE3 and FF7
May: Last of Us Pt. II
June: replay Control when all the DLC is out
July/August: Ghost of Tsushima?
I'm all good.
It was fantastic but I do kinda feel like something is lost when they're just picking games from the website's own "most popular" list. I think it would've been better if they'd each come up with a list beforehand, like Don did, and voted based on those.Easy Update 2020 Fantasy Critic ep. was a blast.
I'd be spending a significant amount of $Don Bucks$ to pick up Dreams ASAP if I were any one of them.
The guy's a machine. If anyone can break that 49ers Defence it's him...Cant imagine how stoked bosman is right now. Mahomes is going to the superbowl!
But the full version releases in February 2020. So it should be able to select, no?Dreams is in early access, it's ineligible based on their settings.
No. The rule is "Games that are available on Early Access aren't eligible games to be drafted."But the full version releases in February 2020. So it should be able to select, no?
If you check "Allow Early Access Games", then there's no restrictions on early access at all. If you don't check it, then once a game enters early access (as in, once you can play it), then it is no longer eligible. You never get points until reviews come in. That part, I don't decide. The idea of the rule is to prevent people from taking games that are playable now, despite not having review scores. It's not much of a prediction if you can go play it at the time you are picking it.
Oh ok, thanks for the infoNo. The rule is "Games that are available on Early Access aren't eligible games to be drafted."
The idea is that it's kind of unfair to be able to play a game that's somewhat representative of the final product but that there isn't reviews for.
The exact text on the FAQ is:
To be honest, I think this posits and interesting question about Showfloor Demos, normal Demos, etc. I mean Bosman literally said himself "Don't pick Biomutant. People have played that, you will lose points."
I don't know, singling out early access only seems a bit inconsistent imo.
No. The rule is "Games that are available on Early Access aren't eligible games to be drafted."
The idea is that it's kind of unfair to be able to play a game that's somewhat representative of the final product but that there isn't reviews for.
The exact text on the FAQ is:
To be honest, I think this posits and interesting question about Showfloor Demos, normal Demos, etc. I mean Bosman literally said himself "Don't pick Biomutant. People have played that, you will lose points."
I don't know, singling out early access only seems a bit inconsistent imo.
incredibly important and thought-provoking editorial on Scoop of Troop today. 2 paws up.
Oh and I'm surprised they didn't bring up the obvious reason why Sony's porting Horizon to PC: The MLB made them do it (:P Mikey Jr. ).
Did Minecraft staying multiplat mean every Microsoft first party game went multiplat?
Isn't one of them Vegito?Whoever designed the back cover of Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot screwed us out of the chance to see Jones' reaction to the panel pondering the ancient philosophical dilemma of "How many Saiyajins is one Gotenks?"
The guy's a machine. If anyone can break that 49ers Defence it's him...
Doesn't look like they are gonna need more Sports Guy questions any time soon.
Mario Strikers is some of the most fun I have had in multiplayer. This is sure to be a blast.
People gave me crap for playing 2016 doom on a ps4 instead of a pc better watch out saying that shit in the streets
I can take the heatPeople gave me crap for playing 2016 doom on a ps4 instead of a pc better watch out saying that shit in the streets
Still think Sports Guy should be replaced with an Anime monster.
(frantically scribbles down notes)Totally agree.
Anime question seems like it has more of a place then History, Vocabulary or Sports.
Hopefully it will be added in the version 3.0.
I assume some of those categories are there so they can ask normies to be on the show.