A lot of my fellow Americans can't wrap their heads around the idea of doing things that benefit the greater society and not themselves personally. It's an intentional effect of the supreme fetishization of the individualism in the US.
"Also, nobody should get free healthcare because I had to pay for a really expensive surgery a few years back. I had no idea we'd get free healthcare years later!"
Seriously. Maybe calling it "Fuck you, got mine" is inaccurate, but instead lets call it "I got fucked, so should you". Really doesn't sound any better.Exactly.
The system should stay shitty because I got fucked by it, so everyone else should too. Time for some self reflection when that's what you're arguing.
I don't plan on having kids (people in massive debt now should probably reflect on this life decision too). If higher education even works like this in 18 years I'll be surprised. This policy doesn't negatively impact me, never said it did.
I went to a community college I could afford, budgeted tuition and living expenses against income, and paid my credit cards off each month. That is objectively more responsible than accumulating debt.
Edit:
To clarify, I never went into debt getting my degree.
The same uneducated poor people who are generally against programs specifically aimed at them because they "don't want handouts"?
Many people did the same thing but still accumulated debt
Many people probably also didn't have the same resources as you did in terms of managing debt, choosing which loans to take, and hell even planning which schools to go to
"Also, nobody should get free healthcare because I had to pay for a really expensive surgery a few years back. I had no idea we'd get free healthcare years later!"
If you ever plan on having kids then this would benefit you as well. The only way this has no benefit to you is if:
1. You have already paid off your student loan debt/never had student loan debt in the first place
2. Your significant other has paid off their student loan debt/never had student loan debt in the first place
3. You do not have children and never plan on having any children
4. You can never forsee yourself going back to school
In which case this policy does not negatively impact you in any way either.
A lot of my fellow Americans can't wrap their heads around the idea of doing things that benefit the greater society and not themselves personally. It's an intentional effect of the supreme fetishization of the individualism in the US.
Do you want Warren to propose a time machine to help you invest earlier?That's not true as the money spent paying back student loans could have been invested or used as a down payment towards a home. Allowing you to be further along in life and more financially secured. Personally I made my peace with it a few years ago but there was a time when I resented the idea having paid back a boatload in student loans.
If it doesn't harm you in any way but helps other Americans, what good reason do you have not to support it? I don't use welfare/unemployment/food stamps, but I support those policies because they help people who do need them.I don't plan on having kids (people in massive debt now should probably reflect on this life decision too). If higher education even works like this in 18 years I'll be surprised. This policy doesn't negatively impact me, never said it did.
I went to a community college I could afford, budgeted tuition and living expenses against income, and paid my credit cards off each month. That is objectively more responsible than accumulating debt.
Edit:
To clarify, I never went into debt getting my degree.
"Also, nobody should get free healthcare because I had to pay for a really expensive surgery a few years back. I had no idea we'd get free healthcare years later!"
Do you want Warren to propose a time machine to help you invest earlier?
Many people did the same thing but still accumulated debt
Many people probably also didn't have the same resources as you did in terms of managing debt, choosing which loans to take, and hell even planning which schools to go to
Oh, so you're talking from a position of absolute ignorance, got it
Good for you. That does not make anyone else irresponsible though. Which is the point I'm trying to make here.
If your only justification is that you should be rewarded because youve seemed yourself responsible as opposed to the masses who should have been better with their money...you're just a crab man.
...yes, your student loans impacted you, but THIS SPECIFIC POLICY IN NO WAY NEGATIVELY IMPACTS YOU. It doesn't directly HELP you if you've already paid your loans, but it doesn't HARM you either. This policy is not the reason you had student loans in the first place.That's not true, as the money spent paying back student loans could have been invested or used as a down payment towards a home. Allowing you to be further along in life and more financially secured. Personally, I made my peace with it a few years ago but there was a time when I resented the idea having paid back a boatload in student loans.
Pretty much.ANDDDDD there it is everyone.
Six pages in and this is why this will never fly. A combination of "what about me" and "I got fucked so should you".
I've heard these arguments in real life.
Honestly, don't even run on this.
It's not asking for much, but apparently we're selfish fucks all the same.
It's fine to ask for it, but there are some people here saying it shouldn't be done at all if they aren't included.It's not asking for much, but apparently we're selfish fucks all the same.
It's more like, my mom mortgaged her house to pay for my operation because I was going to die, but we could have just had the surgery in the emergency room and keep it as debt because it was going to be forgiven anyway.
I think everyone is fine with the whole "going forward, tuition is free" thing, which is an even playing field, it's the debt forgiveness that has people a bit salty.
Has it ever been any other way? All the single issue voters that voted for Trump voted because of this same reasoning.Isn't this a little like buying votes? Like yeah if you give me 50 grand I'll vote for you? I'm not saying that student loans aren't enormous and a huge problem, but people here seem to be saying this is a good idea mainly because it directly affects them.
Which is completely irrational and selfish.It's more like, my mom mortgaged her house to pay for my operation because I was going to die, but we could have just had the surgery in the emergency room and keep it as debt because it was going to be forgiven anyway.
I think everyone is fine with the whole "going forward, tuition is free" thing, which is an even playing field, it's the debt forgiveness that has people a bit salty.
And the focus has been put on those select few because they're more easily dismissed for their unjust position (if I get nothing to relieve prior burdens, no one gets anything!), rather than defending the unjust position you and others (you get nothing to relieve prior burdens but it's okay because you're not made even worse off, how fortunate!) have put forth.It's fine to ask for it, but there are some people here saying it shouldn't be done at all if they aren't included.
...yes, your student loans impacted you, but THIS SPECIFIC POLICY IN NO WAY NEGATIVELY IMPACTS YOU. It doesn't directly HELP you if you've already paid your loans, but it doesn't HARM you either. This policy is not the reason you had student loans in the first place.
I wouldn't be mad if there's reimbursement but it shouldn't be a priority or necessityAnd the focus has been put on those select few because they're more easily dismissed for their unjust position (if I get nothing to relieve prior burdens, no one gets anything!), rather than defending the unjust position you and others (you get nothing to relieve prior burdens but it's okay because you're not made even worse off, how fortunate!) have put forth.
Why don't we do bothWhat percentage of people with student loan debt is actually "struggling"? My guess is 10-20%. I hope those people get help, I really do. But I'd much rather write 50k checks to homeless people and single black mothers. The amount of passion that this thread is generating seems to be because this is a giant check to middle class Gen Z white kids.
Of course not, if feasible that policy sounds great. I support pretty much any policy that involves the government providing assistance to those who need it though. I would be in favor of UBI as well.Would you be against a policy that in addition to offering loan forgiveness, offered reimbursements for the amounts paid for loans in the past few years (subject to the same limitations as this policy)?
It wouldn't harm you and in no way negatively impacts you.
Isn't this a little like buying votes? Like yeah if you give me 50 grand I'll vote for you? I'm not saying that student loans aren't enormous and a huge problem, but people here seem to be saying this is a good idea mainly because it directly affects them.
Isn't this a little like buying votes? Like yeah if you give me 50 grand I'll vote for you? I'm not saying that student loans aren't enormous and a huge problem, but people here seem to be saying this is a good idea mainly because it directly affects them.
What percentage of people with student loan debt is actually "struggling"? My guess is 10-20%. I hope those people get help, I really do. But I'd much rather write 50k checks to homeless people and single black mothers. The amount of passion that this thread is generating seems to be because this is a giant check to middle class Gen Z white kids.
Most people vote because of direct self interests, often financial. When you vote because you want a tax policy that will tax you less, it's the same thing.
75000 people would pay for debt cancellation and to set up a free public option for college. The "educational system" would not rely on 75000 people. This is nonsense.Relying on only 75.000 people to pay your educational system is a very bad idea. This is populistic nonsense.
Relying on only 75.000 people to pay your educational system is a very bad idea. This is populistic nonsense.