I love her response. As a pansexual I'd be more than okay with her as president.
That said... gotta agree, even as a member of the LGBTQ+ community, the thread title kind of oversells it, as do a lot of the responses in the thread. I think if it was presented differently I wouldn't feel this lingering feeling of confusion in the back of my head.
I also beg people who were enthralled by this response to check out her
actual plans, which are really good and thought out. My only qualm is that she still refuses to clarify what M4A means to her. Is it single payer? Is it a public option available for anyone? Is it something you default to if you don't have a private plan? What? Everything else though, is solid gold, and I sincerely hope other candidates put out similar plans soon. I mean, there's even a specific section about ending the murder of trans WoC. It's good stuff.
My rights as a person are not "frivolous".
Good thing they didn't say our rights as people were frivolous. I think it's a bit far to say what she said is frivolous, but I definitely agree with them that what people should really be excited about are her plans for policy, not a soundclip. But, I mean, if you really are floored positively by her response, don't let me or anyone take that from you. My feelings, I guess, are more directed at the cis straight people who are getting overexcited.