Correct. And for the reasons you've listed, we've seen a significant drop in patients year over year for the past 5 years. Our ER is equipped to handle 40k patients a year. Up until 2017, we were getting 60k+ a year but it's subsided a bit and continues to go down.
Just another day.
Well this left leaning think tank that isn't as left leaning as I am likes it and that means we have to scrap it entirely so it never even comes close to being passed even though it severely taxes the ultra wealthy and corporations and provides healthcare to everyone
I wish this were not a realistic comment. Sadly we spend a lot of time choking/woking ourselves to death.
It's a liberal think tank that had close ties with Obama and Clinton
It's John Podesta's think tank headed up by Neera Tanden. They're the most influential public policy research groups on the democratic side. There's a lot wrong with them so I'd say do you own research but for brevity, they're extremely neoliberal and are representative, and in some ways responsible for, everything that sucks about the democratic establishment.
Yeah the replies are mostly Bernie or Busters calling it bad now because it's a sell out plan or it's an establishment plan like that actually makes sense.
So would it be better for you if one of the biggest liberal think tanks was opposed to M4A and her plan had less support? Honestly
Lol you're so far up your own ass I'm not gonna even try with you.
So, let's be clear, CAP opposes the wall. Is that suspect? Because that's the extent of what you're saying without any specifics.
You're stanning a corrupt DC think tank. Why would any of your questions be worth answering?
Please point me to the post where I defended the think tank itself.
That's not even close to what's happening here. You're saying a policy is suspect because a DC think tank supports it without any substance. You're basically saying "these fuckers support it so it must be bad". That is psychoward's point.
Alright alright fine. There's two reasons CAP would support this.
Basically confirms what I thought though, that the reason for the dislike is conspiracies against Warren and not that the actual plan is bad
It's only "vague" if you arent paying attention lol. Those folks arent in the responses for no reason
Yep lol
Name two reasons why you personally don't like the plan that actually talks about the plan itself.
Which is why I still like her and will support her as a second choice. I don't believe she's a *fake leftist* but I don't trust that she's dedicated to the working class like Sanders. And even with the clear camaraderie between Sanders and Warren, I don't think it's one based on having the exact same ideologies.
It's fair game though. No one should trust what a politician has to say unless they give you a reason to trust them. I think Warren has done good work towards being trustable but shit like CAP giving her a wink and a nudge should be concerning to everyone.
In terms of how individuals (as opposed to corporations) are affected, this is what I'm reading:
The post I'm responding to has less to do about the plan and more about CAP being shady. Was that not obvious? Strange that people like Neera Tanden, CAP, and Third Way would dog Sanders at every turn, but suddenly, Liz's plan is good? Cmon.
Yes it would need to be a long term plan even if Bernie were to be in office. An immediate, overnight switch from a system that doesn't even have UHC to M4A is not feasible in any capacity. The ACA was also a gradual roll-out.
