he followed it up with "first to admit it"
he did bring out his mom who got rich on slave labourHe's also the first son of a gem mine owner but he's probably not going to admit that.
Google says Dan Aykroyd hosted in 2003 sooo...
Volimar What’s the current terminology? As someone with Aspergers I’m out of the loop.
I mean if it's no longer use as a medical diagnosis it's outdated, it doesn't matter if people still use it, lots of people still use lots of outdated terms.People with Asperger's are now generally considered to be part of the autism spectrum. The most significant difference is that those with autism usually have developmental struggles (like speaking) the first few years of life and those with Asperger's often don't. Looking online real quick there's still a lot of people using the term so maybe it's not so outdated.
For sure.I mean if it's no longer use as a medical diagnosis it's outdated, it doesn't matter if people still use it, lots of people still use lots of outdated terms.
A good example is Down Syndrome, not used anymore and has been replaced with IDD.
If he grew up using the old terminology, chances are he’ll keep using it out of habit. It’s not a demeaning term afaik.I mean if it's no longer use as a medical diagnosis it's outdated, it doesn't matter if people still use it, lots of people still use lots of outdated terms.
It's generally preferred by a lot of folks than just being called autistic.I mean if it's no longer use as a medical diagnosis it's outdated, it doesn't matter if people still use it, lots of people still use lots of outdated terms.
Oh ok, for some reason I read your comment more as “we have a new term such as “so and so” disorder to describe people on that part of the spectrum. Gotcha though. Thanks.People with Asperger's are now generally considered to be part of the autism spectrum. The most significant difference is that those with autism usually have developmental struggles (like speaking) the first few years of life and those with Asperger's often don't. Looking online real quick there's still a lot of people using the term so maybe it's not so outdated.
Of course, it largely depends on intent, outdated is outdated but it can be seen as permissible given certain criteria.If he grew up using the old terminology, chances are he’ll keep using it out of habit. It’s not a demeaning term afaik.
Just like older canadian people keep using the imperial system even though everything is in metric now
I have it, I know. Things have gotten better but the Autism Boogeyman is still there in the background to some degree.It's generally preferred by a lot of folks than just being called autistic.
Not to defend Musk, but I was always intrigued by this and whether he had mining money backing him growing up. Turns out its not true, his family did not get wealthy from it. In fact, his father's mining efforts were a complete failure.He's also the first son of a gem mine owner but he's probably not going to admit that.
www.forbes.com
Where did you hear that? Down sydrome is still the standard term AFAIK and IDD is a different thing entirely. Down syndrome is not just an intellectual disabilty, it's a complex gentic condition.A good example is Down Syndrome, not used anymore and has been replaced with IDD.
Thanks for correcting me then, hmm where did I hear that now, I heard this years ago so I'm a bit unsure honestly, but I know I definitely did not come up with it on my own.Where did you hear that? Down sydrome is still the standard term AFAIK and IDD is a different thing entirely. Down syndrome is not just an intellectual disabilty its a complex gentic condition.
Why would one desire Musk to have a particular MBTI personality type?I once got into a discord fight with an MBTI focused channel because I asserted musk was not intp like they desired but an autistic entj.
i had this argument in the first place because obviously i too am of the autisms.
Yes totally
I mean isn’t that whole test complete bullshit with no basis in psychology at all and wasn’t even made by psychologists?I once got into a discord fight with an MBTI focused channel because I asserted musk was not intp like they desired but an autistic entj.
i had this argument in the first place because obviously i too am of the autisms.
Yes, but it's a newer form of astrology so people are still into that.I mean isn’t that whole test complete bullshit with no basis in psychology at all and wasn’t even made by psychologists?
It is.Musk's still a dumbass though, but the idea he's a rich daddy boy is not true.
Let's also not forget about one of the most important things in life: connections. All the rich kinds I've known did really well for themselves partly (greatly I'd argue, since most people don't have that) because they simply knew whoever was important in a particular field. People who have landed excellent jobs, got generous loans or hard to get permits for their business, etc.It is.
Even if his dad didn't owned a mine, he still was a sucessfull enginner and they still lived in a mansion on south africa (some places reports that it was the top3 biggest houses of the country) and his mom is a model AND a doctor
It all points to his dad fucking up and loosing most of his part after Elon was in college but he still got a very privileged and rich life before it, just not stupidly rich
People with Asperger's are now generally considered to be part of the autism spectrum. The most significant difference is that those with autism usually have developmental struggles (like speaking) the first few years of life and those with Asperger's often don't. Looking online real quick there's still a lot of people using the term so maybe it's not so outdated.
These, & I'm also someone who happens to have part Asperger's/Autism when I was small.I mean if it's no longer use as a medical diagnosis it's outdated, it doesn't matter if people still use it, lots of people still use lots of outdated terms.
Here's the thing: People have cited bizarre behaviours and mannerisms on Musk's part as of their misgivings about him. Shit like him making a basic gesture of cradling his arms like holding a baby and going 'baby'. To me, a basic shorthand with an accompanying gesticulation. To others, a sign he isn't to be trusted because he's weeeeeird.I'm sure when people give him shit, it has nothing to do with his Asperger's. He's bad in a public setting, that's fine. It's everything else he does. The romanticizing of Mars, spitting on Carl Sagan's remarks about caring for this earth. The lack of unions and crunch culture at Tesla he champions as something for "the vision." Calling a dude who rescued trapped kids a pedophile and sending PIs after him because he didn't like your submarine idea. Poking fun at a potential coup.
Him hosting SNL is going to be a perfect reformation campaign for him. His condition will be presented as the "real thing" people don't like about Musk, that his controversies really amount to smoking weed on a Joe Rogan podcast, and his pretty poor performance will be "the radical left hates the visionary" or something of the kind, when the more honest answer is he isn't funny at all, and that could be his humor, the script he's given, his condition, or a combination of those factors.
Nah, lot's of people go after his "awkward" "mannerisms", how poor he is at public speaking, etc. Not all of it, for sure, but a significant portion.I'm sure when people give him shit, it has nothing to do with his Asperger's. He's bad in a public setting, that's fine. It's everything else he does.