• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
OP
OP
Maxime

Maxime

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,986
Last week, French Deputy Sebastien Leclerc publicly spoke about the strike at Eugen Systems (FR), blaming the strikers of a political agenda and referring to their actions as 'hostage taking'. He basically asked the Government to intervene to end the strike.

Today, Le Monde reveals that Sebastien Leclerc and the wife (Virginie Le Dressay) of Eugen Systems CEO (Cédric Le Dressay) know each others well(FR), creating a potential conflict of interest and an attempt to derail the strike:

[…] Problem, Sebastien Leclerc frequents the same politic places as ... the wife of Eugen Systems CEO, Virginie Le Dressay, adviser of the French Department of Calvados.

Former vice-president of the county council of the same Department, Sébastien Leclerc belongs to the same political family (UDI, DVD) as Virginie Le Dressay. Do they know each other? Yes. He is 'friend' with her on Facebook; they attended the same political instances, such as the administrative board of Calavados' 'Fire and Rescue Service' in 2014; and marched together in several public demonstrations, like the elected 'representatives of the country of Auge' march against the law Allur in 2015.

Is there a link of interest between them? Yes, also: Virginie Le Dressay was one of the political supporters of Sébastien Leclerc for his campaign in the 2017 elections.

According to the Rules of Professional Conduct of the French National Assembly, a conflict of interest is defined as 'a situation of interference between the duties of the Member and a private interest which, by nature and intensity, can reasonably be regarded as likely to influence or seem to influence the exercise of their parliamentary functions'.

Contacted by Le Monde, neither Sébastien Leclerc, nor Virginie Le Dressay, nor Cédric Le Dressay answered our questions. 'The CEO of Eugen system is a resident of my constituency, I am his deputy and he asked me as such,' said the deputy The Republicans to a journalist of Mediapart, Dan Israel.
 
OP
OP
Maxime

Maxime

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,986
New communiqué from the strikers of Eugen Systems, still relayed by French union STJV. They've been on strike for now 6 weeks and the management doesn't even hide anymore they won't do anything. 15 current and former employees decided to bring Eugen Systems in front of the Labour Court.

https://www.stjv.fr/en/2018/03/6-weeks-of-struggle-at-eugen-systems/

Escalation

After 6 weeks on strike and an obvious lack of will to change the situation, Eugen Systems's management finally show their true colours and aren't trying to hide the fact they have no intention negotiating anymore.
Our last meeting of Friday, March 23rd lasted only a quarter of an hour. And for good reason, confronted with systematic rejection from management, we asked whether they would accept to negotiate anything. Their answer was brief and precise: no.

The previous meeting happened on the 21st of March. Management had unilaterally written an end of strike agreement draft, with all our demands either ignored or denied and stating that the strike was useless because the discussion had always been open. Quite bold of them after having ignored the strikers for two weeks and most of the observations brought to them by the personnel's representatives for more than a year.

In this draft, management puts forward the efforts they agree to make that would justify the end of the strike. These promises are mainly legal obligations that should have been fulfilled without us asking for them.
  • Bring us proof that occupational medicine will be paid correctly next year. Contributing to occupational medicine is a legal obligation, we should not need such a promise to be sure it is done.
  • Install a break room at each floor of the premises to have room for enough people. This is once more a legal obligation and hadn't even been mentioned in the context of the strike.
  • A promise of a future company agreement on job classifications. A discussion on that point was already planned. Furthermore, before discussing new classifications maybe it would be better to start by respecting those which are due to us?
  • Detail the calculations for the few wages that were caught up and for the holiday bonuses over a span of 3 years. This is the length of the legal prescription a tribunal would impose, with compensation. Knowing that the bonuses have never been paid, what about the previous years?
  • Counting the hours of negotiation as hours worked for the 4 members of the workers' delegation. This is, once more, a legal obligation.
The strike began because of non-compliance with the law, management trying to pass its partial application as a charitable gesture on their part does not deceive us.

All our proposals have been denied, even those that did not create additional cost for the employer.
For example, they refused spreading the docking of wages from days on strike over several months, a standard compromise that would leave us with enough to live each month.
To justify this refusal, we were told that it was not a question of money.

Furthermore, after we insisted, management signed a written agreement the 5th of March to pay the mandatory contribution to occupational medicine and to bring us proof of payment as soon as it was done. The payment is dated the 12th of March, and management deigned to bring us proof only on the meeting of the 21st, so 9 days after the payment. Management seems to have a few difficulties respecting signed agreements.

Since neither negotiation nor strike seems to be affecting our employers and that compliance with the law seems to be an exaggerated demand from their point of view, we consider that it is time to harden our methods.
About fifteen previous and current employees of Eugen Systems have initiated a procedure with the prud'hommes (labour tribunal of justice). However, this only concerns previous litigations and will not help solve the background problems about working conditions and consideration for the work provided.

These 6 weeks of strike have not been entirely unsuccessful, however: we were able to consult each other, link up with organizations and people. Our situation is not unique, and many other companies take advantage of their employees' passion to put in place working conditions that are illegal.
We invite every person, group and association that see in our struggle a just fight to help us, however the means: mediatically by sharing the articles talking about our situation, financially via the strike fund, morally with your messages of support and by testifying to the legitimacy of this struggle on social networks, with your advice, support, etc. Any help you can bring is more than welcome.

About the strike fund

We have done a first repartition of the strike fund after a month on strike (mid-March). At that moment, the amount in the strike fund was of 8070€ from 182 contributors, and 550€ of direct donations. For complete transparency here is our method of distribution:

  • Integral compensation of the strike's cost to people that couldn't do without. These people were able to bring active support to our movement for a while despite their financial difficulties entirely thanks to you.
  • Counting number of days everyone was on strike, coming to a total of 292 days.
  • Every non-reimbursed striker was able to indicate how much of their share they wished to receive. This let people leave a part of their compensation for others, on a purely voluntary basis, everyone receiving all of their compensation as default. There was a total of 261 shares.
  • Individual compensation equivalent to the number of shares multiplied by the value of a share. This comes to, for someone having been on strike the whole month and who didn't redistribute their shares a sum of approximately 630€.
Thank you all for your messages of support and your donations. They help us to hold on and remind us that our cause is just, our action necessary.

A reminder that, if you can, there is a strike fund to help them.
 
OP
OP
Maxime

Maxime

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,986
New and probably last (for now) communiqué about Eugen Systems' strike. Indeed, the strike ended last week, though not thanks to management's cooperation and good will. Several employees (current and former) started a legal procedure, as said in the previous update. Here is the full statement:

Second Wave

As you were able to read in our previous statement, negotiations with management are at a standstill.
We do not think we will gain any additional ground with this strike, despite the fact our grievances are simply about conforming to labour laws and collective labour agreements.

Thus, we have stopped striking Tuesday, April 3rd, after more than a month a half, to conserve our resources for the future. But this clinical observation does not stop at all our determination: even if the strike is over, the struggle isn't. We will continue to fight for our rights with the legal means at our disposal. Therefore, approximately fifteen Eugen Systems employees and ex-employees have seized the prud'hommes (French labour tribunal). We do not forget also that this movement for a betterment of everyone's working conditions was shouldered by a collective of 24 employees out of 44 employed at the company.

It is thanks to the support we received that we were able to hold out for more than a month and a half, be it encouraging messages or donations from all of you.
The public interest (media, politicians, players…) for this novel social movement reinforces us in the idea that it was not in vain, and that we were right to fight for our rights. We want this industry to mature, to recognize the value of our work and of our skills.

And we will continue to do so, whatever the intimidation attempts.

Eugen Systems strike workers

About the strike fund, we have decided to leave it open to donations for a while still for those that still want to pitch in. We will close it in a few days.
We will then proceed with a similar distribution than the one we discussed in a previous statement.