Edit: Update to this story. https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/...nant_12_year-old_girl_caused_offence/10269265
Plan International Finland has since removed video and photographic material related to the campaign from its website. Paola Suhonen the campaign designer still has the video uploaded on her own channel, changed the Youtube link for that in my original post.
Full story in the link, few quotes below and the campaign video https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/..._featuring_pregnant_12_year-old_girl/10180236
Plan International Finland has since removed video and photographic material related to the campaign from its website. Paola Suhonen the campaign designer still has the video uploaded on her own channel, changed the Youtube link for that in my original post.
Mkwesha subsequently met with representatives of Plan Finland International over the campaign. At the time the organisation acknowledged her concerns but did not issue an apology for the ads.
Following a meeting on Wednesday involving Mkwesha, two colleagues from Sahwira and representatives of both Plan International Finland and Plan International Global, the organisation said that it was sorry for causing offence.
"We do understand that parts of the campaign have been offensive to some. When we run campaigns, we always listen to feedback and take it seriously," Plan International Finland CEO Ossi Heinänen told Yle News on Friday.
He noted that in spite of the backlash from some quarters, the campaign inspired a positive response. “When the campaign was running, the feedback was hugely positive and we shouldn’t underestimate the ability of people to understand what they see," he remarked.
The NGO also said in a statement on its website that it would not accept any future awards for the ads, and that it would incorporate feedback on the campaign into its work in the future.
Full statement from Plan International Finland https://plan.fi/lausuntommeReacting what she perceived as an apology, Mkwesha told Yle News on Thursday that she was "relieved and happy" with the outcome. "This is good for black African girls and children who have been represented in this way by Finnish organisations for the purpose of raising money," Mkwesha said on Thursday.
Mkwesha added that she hopes the Plan case serves as an example to other organisations to remind them “not to use black children in this way without taking into account the dignity of the children, people and countries that they partner with.”
She noted that Plan Finland also pledged to work with partners to discuss how to develop future campaigns. Mkwesha said that her organisation, Sahwira International, will also provide its expertise to ensure that Plan Finland and other NGOs have broad representation.
In a separate statement issued late Wednesday, she said that she is optimistic that in the future, organisations "will be sensitive to the issue of racism, colonial history, racialized power relations; and avoid negative representations that perpetuate racism, prejudices and stereotypes."
She described the outcome as a major accomplishment for her fledgling NGO. "We are a small organisation so this is a big win for us. We have no money, no resources and no permanent staff, we are staffed with volunteers. This shows that we are needed in Finland and can contribute," she concluded.
Original post and article belowPlan International Finland ran a three-week campaign on teenage motherhood in August 2017. It featured a child mother from Zambia.
Approximately seven million girls around the world become mothers before the age of 18 every year, two million of them before they turn 15.
In Zambia it is estimated that one in three girls has a child before they turn 18.
While the campaign has garnered strong support from across the world for raising awareness on teenage motherhood and for its creative concept, it has also received criticism.
We acknowledge the concerns raised on the design and execution of the campaign and are sorry that some aspects of the campaign have caused offence.
As a child rights organisation we greatly value all feedback we receive and these play a major role in continuous evolution and improvement of our work.
Our teenage motherhood campaign concluded in Finland last year and our future campaigns will be informed by the feedback we have received. Also, in acknowledgement of the concerns, we will not accept any more awards for the campaign.
We are reminded that teenage motherhood is a lived reality of millions of girls who become mothers when they are still children themselves.
We firmly believe that girls must be able to enjoy their rights and grow to realise their full potential. Motherhood at an early age poses significant health risks, causes education interruptions and poses risks of child marriage and worsening poverty.
The childmother who voluntarily fronted the campaign is an active member of her community and very much part of Plan International’s programmes that promote girls’ rights. She received support from Plan International during her pregnancy and since giving birth to her baby several months ago. We will continue to work with her and her community to build skills and economic resilience and tackle teen pregnancy and child marriage.
Full story in the link, few quotes below and the campaign video https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/..._featuring_pregnant_12_year-old_girl/10180236
Is it ever right to use a pregnant child in an advert, even to boost awareness of a pressing children’s rights issue? That’s the question one activist is asking after a celebrity-led awareness campaign by Plan International Finland to highlight child pregnancy and advocate for girls’ rights abroad won a Vuoden Huiput award for best creative design in Finland.
Dr. Faith Mkwesha, founder and executive director of the newly-established Sahwira NGO says she was 'shocked' to see a young girl featured in this way, and adds that the campaign risks perpetuating negative stereotypes of black women. Plan Finland, on the other hand, says it wanted to create a shocking campaign and never intended to sexualise any child.
Anttila said that the decision to run with the depiction of young Fridah was discussed at length within the planning team and that there were no real disagreements on the approach. “We spoke with Plan Zambia and with Plan International. We thought that showing a real girl with a real story would better demonstrate the issue and help to try and change things.”
“We visited the girl and her family and spoke with the community and health workers. We tried to ensure that everyone understood what we were doing. In the end the final decision was guided by the fact that she has a strong support network in her family, the community and Plan Zambia,” Anttila explained.
Dr. Faith Mkwesha, a researcher affiliated with Åbo Akademi’s gender department recalled what she said was the confusion she initially felt when she first saw the ad. “I was shocked when I saw a young girl posing in a sexual manner. Alongside her there was a price tag, which was misleading. On closer inspection, I saw the text, which my [Finnish] husband translated into English,” she recounted.
Mkwesha said that her shock turned to anger when she found out more about the scope of the campaign. “What was disturbing was how the child was displayed. No one seems to see that she needs protection instead of being displayed on a bus stop, on YouTube and in Helsinki’s main shopping district. Is it ethical to display girls in this situation in this way?”
“Finnish people like to see this kind of image to donate money. But it promotes a certain view of black women and girls as hypersexualised and loose. It also creates more black-phobia and increases the fear that black men will sexually assault young girls,” Mkwesha declared.
“Eroticising and sexualising a 12 year-old is not the way. This kind of approach can be read as racism and exploitation. If you really want to help, get black people on your creative teams. Do not exhibit kids in a negative way or in ways that perpetuate stereotypes about black women that date back to slavery and colonialism.”
This was surprising to me, I couldn't have imagined the campaign causing this kind of criticism. I do understand that this portrays something racists can twist and turn to push their shit, but that's to be expected for pretty much anything. It's also a harsh reality that these things happen in millions every year so bringing awareness to it is really important to get these kids help, support and to do a change for the future. The accusation of sexualization in the campaign goes bit over my head. What do people in ERA think? Was this a wrong way to do the campaign? How should this subject be treated? Did the campaign designers overlook some serious and maybe obvious issues? I feel if we didn't want racists to hear about these issues, then it wouldn't be talked at all in any form.Responding to Mkwesha’s criticism, Plan’s Eva Anttila said that she agreed that children should always be protected. She stated that the organisation tried to ensure that the girl’s experience was positive and that her voice was heard. Anttila added that Plan supported the girl throughout her pregnancy with pre- and post-natal care and is still supporting her to return to school, which she quit due to the pregnancy.
With respect to the charge that the ads could be read as racist, she said she has recognised this view, but insisted that the campaign is not racist and Plan does not accept racism in any form. "Our aim is not to sexualise any child in this or in any other campaign. We understand the point that we need be more aware now and in the future. We were careful to represent Fridah and the issue in a respectful manner,” she added.
Last edited: