Thats ur assumption . Nowhere in the article it mentions unlocked frame .
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Eurogamer.de: Assassin's Creed Valhalla will also be in 4K60FPS on PS5
- Thread starter Arubedo
- Start date
Honestly native 4K is overrated . 1440p and up with good AA still looks sharp on a 4K screen . I'd rather they target something like 1800p and use the headroom for performance and visual effects.
AC Valhalla comparison is going to be exciting to watch because we will see if PS5 faster SSD can manifest real benefits in an open world game.
AC Valhalla comparison is going to be exciting to watch because we will see if PS5 faster SSD can manifest real benefits in an open world game.
Same. I remember Digital Foundry mentioning that alot of games shown during the presentation looked like they were running at native 4k, and that was actually a waste of resorces since checkboard tech has evolded to the point it upscales to 4k wirh pretty much the same image quality, leaving more resorces available than pushing native 4k.
Why is it so hard to believe that a cross gen game would be able to run 4K/60fps on next gen consoles? It might not be on the highest settings or with ray-tracing, that a 4K/30fps mode would offer.
So is this game actually well optimized or something? Cuz I bet Odyssey couldn't even run at 4k 60 on the new consoles.
My only reason is because of how bad Odyssey and Origins run on modern PC hardware.
That's why he said he'd wait for performance testing. Killzone Shadowfall was "60fps" for MP. We remember how that turned out.
That depends. Even a blind person can spot the differences between RDR2 on Xbox One X and PS4 Pro.
ERA really hates to be happy. A big sprawling open world game will be running at 4K60 on a $399 machine and people still aren't satisfied. Many concern trolls here are offshoot from "RE8 PS5 development troubles" FUD.
Just going by past performance at native 4k. Also consoles have never run the game at 60 fps. So this would be a 1st for them.
I really do not understand why people would think otherwise. The consoles are not that far apart. Do people really think the Series X was going to blow the PS5 away?
I'll believe it when I see it. Have we seen Series X gameplay yet? I don't think there's any pc footage at 4K60. There are youtube videos at 4K60 but they look like 1080p footage uploaded to youtube at 4K.
Nice. It'll be interesting to see the direct comparison but it sounds like it'll be close enough.
Hopefully the game is good, too.
Hopefully the game is good, too.
same but I do think that lower dynamic res is gonna be more standard as the generation goes on. with how reconstruction techniques are shaping up, native resolution is the first thing devs should be sacrificing IMO
Im not seeing what would be so hard about taking a game that will easily hit at least 1440p 30fps on Pro and getting that to 4K60 on PS5 at equivalent settings.
and before that plenty figured even reaching 60 from an AC game, considering Odyssey, was not gonna happen. Great news.
odysey pc is also running on dx11 api which is completely choked by drawcalls for games this scale.
Anvil already got a vulkan patch with Breakpoint and it lifted up performance all across the board. Not dramatically, but if valhalla is built for dx12/vulkan from the get go, it could actually run better than odyssey.
Ironically the best thing next-gen could do for us is have everyone focus on reconstruction and using that additional perf in other ways (like additional IQ / RT / FPS etc)
That is gonna happen. We see it already now. And will happen more and more next gen. Its gonna be a no brainer.
i fully expect the mid gen refresh consoles to have a hardware based AI solution like dlss at this point
Didn't expect these responses this is great news oh well next generation launch is shaping up to be the best one yet third-party titles are looking strong
Low core CPUs have been pretty poor performance wise in recent AC games so it looks like the Devs are hitting the ground running tech wise. I think AC as a launch game is going to be quite the spectacle and a big "oh wow" for gamers who are use to 30fps. On my I5 4670k and 1080 I spent most of Odyssey at 45fps, so I'm very excited to try Valhalla out.
Yeah hoping we are getting vulkan/DX12 now on PC with these engines, with better multi-threaded CPU performance out of the gate. Will love to see what a 3080 can do on this game when not CPU bottlenecking like on Odyssey.
Of course it is. The UE 5 demo and TLoU II on Pro are here to prove it.
But I am not worried, it's a cross gen titles.
It depends though... it looks good on a TV from 8 feet away, but not on a monitor 3 feet away or on a large Tv from closer. But I think reconstruction techniques make a big difference as well. I do not know if the consopels will get something like DLSS in the future, but if they do, that's going to be the way to go for most games.
This does not tell the whole story by a long shot. We do not know what sort of concessions, if any need to be made to match these two specs accors sboth consoles. Certainly on paper you would think concessions must be made, but we will not know until we can compare.
Not sure anyone here is claiming this makes the PS5 dead though, even if there are concessions.
This is going to be the most boring generation ever in terms of tech face-offs but we'll still get pages upon pages of people yelling at each other in the DF threads.
People should remember that AC Unity was 900p on both PS4 and Xbox One, even though PS4 had much more stronger GPU.
Ubisoft went with parity, there was a "big outrage" about it because it and Destiny were the first games to do so a year after consoles launched. We got few gold GIFs about that parity "betrayal" event on old forum. lol
AC Valhalla could be 4K on both now, with Series X leaving performance on the table because Ubisoft wanted the same presentation on both platforms. We'll see soon enough.
Ubisoft went with parity, there was a "big outrage" about it because it and Destiny were the first games to do so a year after consoles launched. We got few gold GIFs about that parity "betrayal" event on old forum. lol
AC Valhalla could be 4K on both now, with Series X leaving performance on the table because Ubisoft wanted the same presentation on both platforms. We'll see soon enough.
I haven't even played an Assassin's Creed game since Black Flag, and I'm well aware that some of the critiques toward their design philosophy aren't necessarily to my taste. But if I purchase a PS5 before year's end, I think I might use this + Bloodborne as my launch titles.