I think it's more their development environment than the size preventing multiplatform development. they tend to aim low from the start (vita), making upper end systems easier to support. if they had an engine that supported Switch and PS4 from the start, I think we'd see multiplat games from themI'm not sure they are big enough for multiplatform development.
Since when has that ever happened. Expensive new consoles rarely ever kill off cheaper popular consoles especially in the US .They still say the port is more due to the Switch's popularity in the west. Given that the PS5(maybe even Xbox) will probably blow up the Switch's spot in the west I'd be surprised they don't ditch it and move to the PS5.
They still say the port is more due to the Switch's popularity in the west. Given that the PS5(maybe even Xbox) will probably blow up the Switch's spot in the west I'd be surprised they don't ditch it and move to the PS5.
Are they still using Sony's PhyreEngine?I think it's more their development environment than the size preventing multiplatform development. they tend to aim low from the start (vita), making upper end systems easier to support. if they had an engine that supported Switch and PS4 from the start, I think we'd see multiplat games from them
Said it before: Home console gaming's got their days counted. The current lifestyle is too volatile for gaming to be only available at home.
I didn't say it would kill it, but the PS5 will more than likely sell enough that they wouldn't need anything on the side.Since when has that ever happened. Expensive new consoles rarely ever kill off cheaper popular consoles especially in the US .
There is no reason for them to move to PS5 only .
There games don't use much system power and PS5 has BC .
Even if they don't move to PS5 there fans will still get to play the games .
Said it before: Home console gaming's got their days counted. The current lifestyle is too volatile for gaming to be only available at home.
True but that has nothing to do with what this thread is about right? I think it's pretty obvious that Falcon should eventually release for both but isn't the point of this thread to say that Western fans are moving to switch? In which case, isn't it a valid response to say some of that has to do with PS4 being on its last legs and Switch being in it's prime?
I think they're on their own engine now. while a agnostic engine doesn't guarantee multiplats, it does lower the barriers considerably. partners wouldn't have to jump through so many hoops to get games running on other systems. stuff like this game or Ys8 could have hit PS4/PC/Switch all at the same time with a capable partnerAre they still using Sony's PhyreEngine?
In an ideal world they would go multiplat to give people options and spread their fanbase but i'm not sure they have the resources to do it, even with the right engine it still takes people, time and money for it. Maybe with Nisa involved at least YsVIII might get a Switch port again. It seems unlikely for the Trails games though at this point I imagine.
The PS5 is obviously gonna do well lol. I'm talking PS6-PS7You'd have been wrong had you said this 15 years ago and you're wrong now. Looking forward to the PS5 blowing the doors off.
You say that as if they didn't already ditch a weaker platform (Vita) to be exclusive to a more powerful one.
Yeah me neither. I just don't like how some pretend like there isn't a bigger picture. Like yeah, the switch is absolutely an appealing product for JRPG fans (myself included since I've owned one since launch) but there is more to it than that. JRPGs will continue to sell well on home consoles too.There hasn't been any proof looking Westward that the Switch has negatively affected the PS4 or Xbox One. I don't even really think it's true in Japan either where the Switch and PS4 share many more games. Sales have largely been additive not shifted. So . . . I dont think the launch of next gen does anything to the Switch nor does the launch of Switch 2 do anything to next gen.
Lmao no. Where do these takes come from.
Eh, it mostly shares it with the PS4. Its a nice relationship too.
It may be more a reference to the audience for AA Japanese games is moving to the Switch in the West. Which may be accurate to an extent but that mostly just means they should release more Switch games. I dont anticipate the launchbof PS5 and Xbox Next suddenly making people rush back into buying AA Japanese games that look like high res PS3 titles.
Most of my friends play nothing but Playstation....Honestly, I see this. Most of my friends now play Switch only and due to the Switch I won't be purchasing a PS5 until the slim model. There's so much quality stuff to play on the Switch that appeals to me that I don't even need to think about spending money on another platform right now
That is because Vita was dying in Japan and had horrible sales in the west also .
Also they had to move on because there was no way for there fans to play there games once they move to PS4.
It not the same with PS5 since it got BC.
The article was posted yesterday, so it can't have been in response to that announcement.If it was really said during Falcom Financial results it's werid that we are hearing this now as that was a few months ago. Seems like reactionary article to the CSIII annoucment which is all NIS and not Falcom.
Seems iffy.
they have no problem pushing vita/ps3 graphics on ps4, they'll do the same on ps5.Might be a hot take, but I can see Falcom moving to Switch as they won't be able to continue offering PS3-looking games on the PS5 and the Switch will be the perfect platform for that after the PS4 is done.
in the west, yes.Did Ys 8 do better on Switch than PS4?
What's this "global performance for Ys 8" about?
Honestly, who'd pay attention to Falcom's financial statements until now?If it was really said during Falcom Financial results it's werid that we are hearing this now as that was a few months ago. Seems like reactionary article to the CSIII annoucment which is all NIS and not Falcom.
Seems iffy.
Honestly, who'd pay attention to Falcom's financial statements until now?
falcom fans are too busy stopping other people from playing falcom games.
Fan communities actually dissect them.Honestly, who'd pay attention to Falcom's financial statements until now?
ANYAtlus still has SMT coming... any day now.
Atlus just doesn't like to release their games on multiple consoles in general fsr.
It's because the graphical compromises are minimal and Switch adds more value to these type of games by virtue of being a portable console.Outside of the visually impressive graphical showcases, I prefer playing JRPGs on the Switch. Really don't know why.
How so? I'm part of that demographic and I see no reason why I should get a Switch when I already have a PS4.
there's also ni no kuni 1, which sold more on switch in every territory despite being the un-remastered version.Looking at sales of Vesperia or their own Ys confirms such a notion.