In reality, it's "You have two options, tell us how you hacked your way into this restricted area using a banned third party app or be permanently banned. I hope you make the right decision."
What is wrong about the developers banning people who are using illicit means to gain access to developer only areas?
IIRC Blizzard wasn't banning people for glitching into old Ironforge, but I could be remembering wrong.
Sonic 06. And while that of course wasn't the game's actual title, another _6 becomes a disaster!
No, Blizzard has never banned people for glitching into Old Ironforge, behind Stormwind, GM Island or really anywhere that was not intended via natural means, only if using actual 3rd party exploits. The only time Blizzard has ever banned people due to glitches is excessive use of things like farming for gold or items that would actually ruin the economy. Because they actually have an economy, unlike 76 which with natural duping people seem to think will affect some mysterious economy this game has.
There's a lot that can go wrong by using this room. You might break certain questlines for yourself and then log bugs that support can't reasonably deal with. You could grab tonnes of stuff and grief other players in PVP. You could get things that help you earn Atoms (the item shop currency) at an abnormally fast rate. The list goes on. It's in everyone's best interest that this exploit is sealed off so that only BGS QA and devs can access it. Normally I'd say this kind of room shouldn't exist at all but it implies that BGS probably didn't have the tools/time to implement a safer cheat setup for their QA and devs who need it.
Oh they most likely did have a safer way, I mean the fact that it runs off the same engine code as FO4 means you could very easily open the console to game asset importing but that would need to be sealed in similar fashion to other MMO commands. I'd also have thought they would seal that sort of stuff off once shipped and use an internal local build for dev sandboxing but hey there is a lot of things I'd thought they'd do here.
and it's funny, because I'm a singeplayer guy who will always advocate for more singleplayer titles, but Bethesda wouldn't be going through so much shit if their pipeline wasn't absolute trash. You can tell the problem stems from there directly. No matter how many games they put out from now onwards developed by Bethesda internally, if they don't shake things up, all of their games will be met with the same reception
You could atleast rationalize that catastophe with the understanding that it was in development hell for god knows how longHow quickly we forget
Ripley's flamethrower? did she have her own personalized flamethrower in the director's cut of the director's cut special edition and I missed it?How quickly we forget
I know I'm nitpicking here, I'm just not a fan of that type of marketing-lingo in general. she duct-taped two guns together, she didn't engineer a super weapon.
they stopped caring and just wanted easy money through gaas and microtransactions
it's not yet available because people are making a lot of money out of this by just selling virtual items got through this room
