Overwatch has considerably more diversity than most games, this isn't the game to be disappointed with.
I forgot how much harder it is to make black women over Hamsters. Glad we got that Hamster reprensation over with though.
I thought there is some kind of outrage, which is not case. My bad. It's okay wanting things in game.Why assume it's "wracked with despair and suffering" level of disappointment then? It's as if you're attempting to exaggerate how people feel about this matter, and then use that as justification to dictate and police their feelings, which seems ridiculous.
And do you not see how irrelevant and condescending it would be to state something as obvious as "Blizzard can't do everything" in response to someone saying they'd like to see a hippie-themed character or beach level in the game? People want things in games, especially when that something (in this case: diverse representation of cultures/ethnicities in the playable cast) has precedence.
This isn't a case of people wanting things like full environmental destruction or a dating sim mode that aren't already present in the game and aren't things that the devs have prioritised. This is wanting a character with a certain background/nationality/appearance alongside an already diverse cast.
What actually is your problem with that?
One can say the same for a playable black woman and yet the mere suggestion is receiving a ton of pushback ittAnd what is wrong with including a fun to play hamster character? Nothing.
One can say the same for a playable black woman and yet the mere suggestion is receiving a ton of pushback itt
It's not a long threadWhere is the push back? Not seen any. Although, to be fair I've not had time to review the full thread.
Relax. I don't think the hamster was chosen over a black woman.
And what is wrong with including a fun to play hamster character? Nothing.
Because the discussion is never made in good faith. Social media has made these types of discussions go from 'hey they do this to could improve' to 'they're being bigots for not doing this specific thing.'
Hell, in another Overwatch thread we had a poster try to bring up Genji and Hanzo's "racist accents" despite one VA being native Japanese and the other being Japanese American.
It's just become exhausting to have these conversations when people are so quick to go straight for the throat. I don't blame those who are upset over representation, what they feel are their real feelings. I just don't feel like the conversation will ever lead to anything better than "let's drag these people for this thing."
I thought there is some kind of outrage, which is not case. My bad. It's okay wanting things in game.
Not saying it was and there's nothing wrong with it. My point is that including a black woman shouldn't be looked at as for representation sake or an impossible task if they could fit in a Hamster of all things. Yet there are people in this thread acting like it's some sort of outrageous request.
Exactly. And Farah and Ana not considered black women is news to me. They've been in my mind since day one. And they're actual African women. The hell....Overwatch has such a diverse cast of characters, like doesn't it have more females at this point?
I think it's just a matter of time.
Exactly. And Farah and Ana not considered black women is news to me. They've been in my mind since day one. And they're actual African women. The hell....
They are Arab Egyptian. The dominant ethnic group in Egypt today are Arabs.Exactly. And Farah and Ana not considered black women is news to me. They've been in my mind since day one. And they're actual African women. The hell....
Don't be disingenuous. They're not white. I know there are shades of black and they definitely land on of of those shades of black. The fact that they're African is a bonus.You would describe Ana and Pharah as black? They're from an African country, but so are South African people who are white. Not all Africans are black.
How can you not believe people want particular types of representation in games? That it's never something discussed in good faith? I don't understand why you focus so much on the most extreme responses rather than the discussion as a whole.
Like, you're referencing an individual's opinion from some other thread—one person—and seemingly being exasperated over it as if that shapes the entire discussion of Genjo and Hanzo's portrayals.
Saying "the discussion is never made in good faith" completely contradicts "I don't blame those who are upset over representation, what they feel are their real feelings." Which is it?
And why are comments like Austin Walker's in regard to Blizzard's "fumbles on race so many times" such an extreme instance of "dragging" or "going or the throat" to you? Do you think that's a super harsh criticism, or are you ignoring that in lieu of the more fringe, extreme comments? I ask because it's weird to see such concern in regard to gamers' responses to a game when we have instances of devs directly receiving death threats and harassment over puddles in games looking different between previews and final builds.
Overwatch is already the most diverse game I've seen in recent memory. Also diverse in ages and body shapes as well. Sure they can always do more and better but, Jesus Christ, cut these guys some slack! Overwatch doesn't have Eskimo or Filipino women either but that doesn't mean Overwatch isn't trying. People sure like to complain.They are Arab Egyptian. The dominant ethnic group in Egypt today are Arabs.
I didn't say they were white. I'm using white South African people as an example of "people from an African country that aren't black." You said "they're actual African women..." as if they necessitated them being black, which isn't the case.Don't be disingenuous. They're not white. I know there are shades of black and they definitely land on of of those shades of black. The fact that they're African is a bonus.
Overwatch is already the most diverse game I've seen in recent memory. Also diverse in ages and body shapes as well. Sure they can always do more and better but, Jesus Christ, cut these guys some slack! Overwatch doesn't have Eskimo or Filipino women either but that doesn't mean Overwatch isn't trying. People sure like to complain.
Why do you believe it's an unwinnable situation, as if the only way to succeed is to do it 100% perfectly, and anything less is abject failure? Blizzard can have a really well put together, diverse cast of characters, and they can be one of the best in the business in that regard. They also have areas they can improve in.
Being good or the best at something doesn't mean you're perfect, and it doesn't absolve you of facing criticism. In fact, it's that Blizzard has generally been good about diversity and that they clearly strive for it that makes people believe discussing the matter is worthwhile. No one is going to discuss how Custer's Revenge could have done better at having more mindful diversity and better treatment of its subject matter because it never even tried in the first place.
Why do you characterize the entire discussion as being so extreme?
They could easily solve this by allowing Efi to pilot Orisa like Dva.
I mean, how old is Dva? 17? 18?
Whatever. It is what it is I guess. Up until now I always thought of them as black but I guess I didn't analyzed them that closely. News to me then.I didn't say they were white. I'm using white South African people as an example of "people from an African country that aren't black." You said "they're actual African women..." as if they necessitated them being black, which isn't the case.
And they're definitely not white, but they would not generally be considered black either. Not sure how else to describe it ...
Im not advocating for blizzards offices to be picketed and protested until a black woman shows up in overwatch. Why do y'all take the mere expression of disappointment and equate it with hysterical and disproportionate outrage? Nothing in that Kotaku article in OP is unreasonable and yet here we are.Overwatch is already the most diverse game I've seen in recent memory. Also diverse in ages and body shapes as well. Sure they can always do more and better but, Jesus Christ, cut these guys some slack! Overwatch doesn't have Eskimo or Filipino women either but that doesn't mean Overwatch isn't trying. People sure like to complain.
Indians can't be black either, apparently.Muslims can't be black and Egypt isn't Africa? Was this written be a white person?
They would be considered Middle Eastern who do not define themselves as "black". It's like when people say Italians or Spanish are PoC when the majority very much see themselves as white. It's not about stereotype but how the people themselves refer to themselves. I don't think I've ever heard of Egyptians refering to themselves as black, it's mostly arabic or middle-eastern. We shouldn't tell others what they are, specially when it seems there's alot of black woman that don't see them as such. We don't get to tell them what is "black".Race remains a societal concept, not a biological one. That's why people constantly deny, shift and question the race of some. Ana and Pharah by all means are black, North African women. Even if they don't fit the stereotype some have created for what a black person is. That does not mean, however, that Overwatch could not use more central African, South African women in their cast, or a black woman living anywhere else on the planet. We should be able to ask for and receive all of that.
That was the original idea. Then Blizzard realized it might not be a good idea for a 12 year old black girl to get shot and blown up in a video game.
D.Va's 19 btw.
Safety Pod?
Like if the robot blows up, it would shoot up a pod and a worm hole will spawn in the sky, allowing her to safely be at the spawn point while we watch the broken robot body blowing up with similar death camera until timer is up.
Mexican can't be black either or something to that effect.
You can feel a way and still discuss in bad faith. You don't really want to have a conversation, but just want to drag or criticize something/someone because of said feelings.
I referenced one example as an example of the kind of leaps in logic to be able to justify their take. And Walker's comments are a bit eye-raising, but nowhere near the level of death threats and harassment. That comparison doesn't even make sense and just tries to devalue the whole point that you can't make everyone happy all the time.
I'm sure there'll be a black woman in Overwatch relatively soon, and don't have a problem with it at all. Hell, I don't really have a problem with people bringing up wanting a black woman character.
I'm merely pointing out that someone's always going to have a gripe no matter what Blizzard does with this game because it catered to someone before them.
It's not quite that simple. Using Inuit as a general term erases Yupik.I know you mean no harm, but the term Eskimo has been considered offensive for some time now. Please use the term Inuit instead.
Is the correct term First Nations?It's not quite that simple. Using Inuit as a general term erases Yupik.
We do have some stuff in the OP but most people in this topic have basically decided to say they are wrong and don't know what a black character is - which is unfortunate as I feel that last link was put in the OP for people not to do that.You know what, maybe we need more black women who would give their opinions on the matter.
It's not quite that simple. Using Inuit as a general term erases Yupik.
Yeah, no shit. People are gonna have things they want and Blizzard isn't above criticism. What you're doing here is you're pretending that the people asking for a Black Woman character in the game are A) making unreasonable requests and B) are hysterical and disproportionately outraged. Going by that Kotaku article this thread is created from there's nothing that indicates to me that this isn't anything more than mere disappointment. No one is calling Blizzard racist company for not having black women in the game. No one is demanding that Blizzard's offices be picketed and protested until their demands are met. You just have a few people on social media who are disappointment with what could have been and what hasn't happened yet. there's no reason for such a response and in doing so you're purposely silencing people who have that opinionI'm merely pointing out that someone's always going to have a gripe no matter what Blizzard does with this game because it catered to someone before them.
That I do not know. My knowledge about the matter is very limited unfortunately. Obviously using the term Inuit instead of Eskimo doesn't come with an intent for offense or malice (does intention matter is up to debate), but it does ignore the existence and identity of Yupik people.
Because they don't want black women in this game and are doing their best to shroud their disdain for anything black by painting a want for an unrepresented character as an insult to the people who work on the game.Im not advocating for blizzards offices to be picketed and protested until a black woman shows up in overwatch. Why do y'all take the mere expression of disappointment and equate it with hysterical and disproportionate outrage? Nothing in that Kotaku article in OP is unreasonable and yet here we are.