And yet we see no meaningful pushback from within conservative movements to defend black people. We see no traction within conservative movements for women's rights. Again, you can say it's a mischaracterization, but there is zero punitive action from within right wing circles against such beliefs. They can say it's not their views, yet they continually support these policies with their vote.Those aren't their views though. That's literally the whole problem with your position.
You don't get to say that because alt rightists think black people are biologically inferior that most conservatives have that belief, for example, because most don't. So being harsh on them and mischaractarizing them is not just being harsh; it's being wrong. I prefer to not do that. You are confusing two issues I have here.
If I was inaccurately describing these voters, this is something I would consider. But I look at the political landscape and the continued behavior of conservative politics, and I see zero inconsistency.I don't care who the onus falls on. You're not answering my question.
You said conservative voices don't like being generalized for extreme right wing politics. Okay. What standard then should they be judged by if not for the way that they vote? Because you're saying leftist critics are calling them murderers:
So I ask you, when has scientific data, statistical evidence of social inequality, testimonies from victims of marginalization, etc. ever mattered to conservative voters? Because if that were the case, America would not be in the state it is now. With all the data available, when have conservative politicians looked at the numerous detailed reports indicating wildly uneven and biased patterns of arrests and convictions against minorities resulted in someone saying "This is not okay, we need to do better"? Where is the conservative progress on that front?Like literally man, we learned this since I was young, that missionaries who go around teaching everyone they meet are bad people, have a bad time. If you tell someone they are bad, they instantly get on the defensive, and you've already lost. Instead, you will be a much more effective missionary if you talk to someone, understand their motivation, and then lead them in a different direction. It won't happen in one conversation. It takes a while. You have to plant doubt in their mind so that they have the motivation to go search it out and be convinced themselves. Like. I physically saw that. In practice. That works. I have NEVER seen "you are a bad person and you suck and you probably want to kill people" work. It doesn't. Ever. I don't care how right you think it is; it is counterproductive. That's the seemingly contradictory part, but that's how it is. You will never convince someone to change to your position by attacking them. And if that is the case, why are you doing it? To feel better about yourself?
Making them out to be murderers is so stupid. Because instantly every single one will go "Hey, I'm not a murderer. These liberals are just making me out to be a bad guy! See how screwed up their view is of me? The idiots."
You see, you can keep saying conservatives are painted with too wide a brush, but there are no signs that these same people would act or vote any differently in response to the garbage of the grander right wing movement.
Considering the mountains of problems Islamist nations face in regards to rights of women, rights of LGBT individuals, etc., yeah, we pretty openly condemn that notion under the basis of "the separation of church and state." And these same criticisms can and should be levied against law-makers basing policy off of Christian fundamentalism.What does "Islamist" motivations mean? If someone who is Muslim wants to affect law, guided by their Islamic beliefs, do we say that's wrong and attack them just because someone else took those believes and used them horribly?
If we're going to round this back to Far Cry 5, the game using loaded religious or nationalistic imagery bears a weight and responsibility. The game saying nothing can still mean it's "fine," but it made its pitch and it wants to use the coding of which to evoke a reaction. Both the way FC5 and Infinite choose to engage with their language can only be described as cowardly.
Last edited: