"Agency" in this sense really doesn't translate well to people who aren't already arguing from the same perspective. When people say that characters don't have "agency," it's not the idea that we should keep the fictional character's fictional feelings and fictional rights in mind, but that any in universe justification of a character's actions is ultimately arbitrary, since the author (be it a single writer of a book, or a whole production team for a video game) holds all the "agency" for all the characters.
Yeah my OP clearly fucked the tone of the thread, which I regret.
I never said dont play the game, unless youre talking about others
Yeah and some cultures, I think some parts of the US in example, eating horse is sometimes considered a taboo too. Horse meat is great, it's low fat. And while I've never eaten dog myself, I'd be hypocritical if I took an issue with it. I leave that to vegetarians who can call it out without being hypocrites and they can call me out too on my general meat consumption. Shouldn't matter that much if it's pig, cow or dog that I'm eating. Cows and pigs are cute too.
Attack dogs vs mutilated dogs bred from birth with suicide vests
I feel much more for the suffering of animals than I do for humans. I'd rather have dogs than kids, and I'd choose my dog over someone's child if I had to choose to save one from dying. There are plenty like myself that feel the same.
You're right only white people can care about animals. GOT HIM
It adds an enemy type, that moves fast and is harder to hit because of their size (so it's enemy variety, games are often criticized for the lack of it). It's also enemy type that kinda makes sense. As similar things have been used in real world.
You said your wife told you not to buy the game because of the dogs. So my comment was more on her opinion considering some people in this thread agree with her.
