*chucles*When you see it 5 seconds ahead of a Ferrari after 3 laps, you'll say "wow"
*chucles*When you see it 5 seconds ahead of a Ferrari after 3 laps, you'll say "wow"
And he didn't even deserve it... :PMe.
I don't care. It's been what? 12 years since the Kimi brought us to the promised land?
I was kidding, of course he did, don't know why I said that.
Vettel would have to beat Leclerc first and I don't know if that's a sure thing.
They didn't let Leclerc pass Vettel in the very first race. I'm pretty sure Vettel won't have any problems beating him when they won't even let him race.
How'd that work out again?...Shall I remind you of early 2010 in which Alonso was told not to attack Massa in the first races of the season whenever he was behind
Not gonna go into this again but that is absolutely standard procedure at this point. Shall I remind you of early 2010 in which Alonso was told not to attack Massa in the first races of the season whenever he was behind? There was no point in switching positions at that point considering Leclerc was never gonna catch the drivers in front.
My god, people still complaining about the Leclerc thing. I wonder if these people were around when Schumacher tried to make an intentional photo finish so Barichello could win but fucked up and ended up winning himself. These people would rend the flesh from the faces in the "horror" of what is happening to the most honourable f1 *eye roll*
edit: Actually, my mistake. Barrichello did take that win. Same thing applies though, if not more so
They don't even have to go that far. Just look back to what Bottas did in Hungary for a wingman. How Piquet Jr. crashed into a wall intentionally to have his teammate capitalize on a safety car. Or if we want to go back to those days, how Coulthard intentionally took out Schumacher from the lead while getting lapped, which later handed the title to Hakkinen.
But yeah, not allowing two teammates to fight after the last pitstop on the first race of the season... the horror.
We laugh at them.It's a Ferrari thing. If it were Ferrari that perpetrated the 2007 spygate thing and not Mclaren we would STILL be hearing about it. But nah, it mysteriously is never brought up and people only hope for the best for them....
Only because they are an extremely arrogant team that refuses to admit they're midpack. Anyone would get laughed at for that.
Don't be silly, it's an F1 thing, happens every season.It's a Ferrari thing. If it were Ferrari that perpetrated the 2007 spygate thing and not Mclaren we would STILL be hearing about it. But nah, it mysteriously is never brought up and people only hope for the best for them....
Was looking through kimi's records and notable achievements earlier. Maybe I'm reading the "fandom" wrong but whenever people mention Alonso as an all time great driver Kimi never seems to be brought up. It's like people only think of post retirement Kimi and his personality and it overshadows his ability. The record for most consecutive fast laps, six consecutive fast laps in a race, 10 fastest laps in a season twice etc
Instead of asking, Leclerc should have gone for the overtake and only backed off if instructed.
Yeah Kimi is amazing. He's a world champion for a reason. He's nearly a multiple world champion a few times too. He's still top fucking tier too, just a little past his prime.
I'd honestly pick Kimi over Alonso in their prime in a one on one duel
Nope, I'd pick Kimi. Alonso would lose his cool and do something stupid
As part of your initiation you must now decide if you love or hate Lewis Hamilton lolHi IDK what F1 is/was but I watched the documentary so here I am let's go Red Bull
As part of your initiation you must now decide if you love or hate Lewis Hamilton lol
And first race in he retires...same as it ever was...So in the Red Bull episode of that Netflix Documentary it seemed like the engines Renault was supplying to Red Bull we not suitable. So Daniel Ricciardo decides to leave Red Bull....for Renault?
So in the Red Bull episode of that Netflix Documentary it seemed like the engines Renault was supplying to Red Bull we not suitable. So Daniel Ricciardo decides to leave Red Bull....for Renault?
It was the best non-RBR ride he could get. Abiteboul seemed to sign him almost purely out of spite. Does anyone, who isn't French, root for Renault?So in the Red Bull episode of that Netflix Documentary it seemed like the engines Renault was supplying to Red Bull we not suitable. So Daniel Ricciardo decides to leave Red Bull....for Renault?
I do now.It was the best non-RBR ride he could get. Abiteboul seemed to sign him almost purely out of spite. Does anyone, who isn't French, root for Renault?
As others have said, the best none red bull ride he could get. But even then, you can see his long term logic as Renault makes the car and the engine, which Redbull does not. He even said in the doc he's thinking two, three years down the lineSo in the Red Bull episode of that Netflix Documentary it seemed like the engines Renault was supplying to Red Bull we not suitable. So Daniel Ricciardo decides to leave Red Bull....for Renault?
I don't go out of my way to favor Renault, but I do want to see non-Merc/Fer/RB teams on the podium and being competitive for the championships.It was the best non-RBR ride he could get. Abiteboul seemed to sign him almost purely out of spite. Does anyone, who isn't French, root for Renault?
I think that was a big part of them signing Ricciardo. He's arguably the most popular driver on the F1 grid and he's PR gold.
Do you mean Honda? They'd be the only one who could possibly be bigger. But considering that Renault is aligned with nissan and Mitsubishi to the point they have a shared board. Even then...
Do you mean Honda? They'd be the only one who could possibly be bigger. But considering that Renault is aligned with nissan and Mitsubishi to the point they have a shared board. Even then...
Your questionable choice of an NFL team should have reminded me of your low standards :-P
I sleep better at night knowing I'm not supporting the team that employs Jameis Winston 😊