No it's not. They went into a dangerous environment to kill innocent animals for money.
You serious?Yeah. Fuck poachers. There's no difference in taking a human life, or that of a Lion.
It is only fitting a Lion killed them. Sometimes you just get what you deserve.
I don't understand how you can sympathize with poachers.
Oh my God, imagine if we actually did win it and Skinner, Baddiel and the Lightning Seeds made a sequel song. It's 2018, let's go full meme and full circle.
Saying it all comes down to poverty is simply not true. A lot of poachers are feeding into a market they know will bring them money and many aspects of poaching come from what it symbolizes.You are in a privileged position to say this. Poachers aren't hunters. They need to feed themselves and their families. Rather than killing humans, they choose to hunt animals.
By your logic, you should show zero sympathy to soldiers sent to Iraq and have died there. Since they had no reason to be there. This whole argument stops if you say you have no sympathy for these either and your logic is consistent. Otherwise, you show you have no understanding of African and poverty stricken regions at best.
So they eat Rhino horns and Elephant tusks do they?You are in a privileged position to say this. Poachers aren't hunters. They need to feed themselves and their families. Rather than killing humans, they choose to hunt animals.
By your logic, you should show zero sympathy to soldiers sent to Iraq and have died there. Since they had no reason to be there. This whole argument stops if you say you have no sympathy for these either and your logic is consistent. Otherwise, you show you have no understanding of African and poverty stricken regions at best.
Alisson, Fagner, Thiago Silva, Miranda e Marcelo; Fernandinho; Paulinho, Coutinho, Willian e Neymar; Gabriel Jesus.
No surprises here. Let's see what will be Tite plan against Belgium.
So soldiers, with guns and fighter jets went in there without the intent to kill human beings? And they accidentally just happened to kill tens of thousands?Saying it all comes down to poverty is simply not true. A lot of poachers are feeding into a market they know will bring them money and many aspects of poaching come from what it symbolizes.
Is there desperate families? Sure, but you cannot paint every poacher as being some poor desperate family trying to get by. Not only that but we as humans need to understand how much we are fucking our ecosystem and wildlife by letting greed run it. You might look for a reason to sympathize but when you do all it does is allow for more poaching to take place and destroy animals which in turn fucks over humans too.
Your Iran example is poor because the intention isn't going their to kill and sell Iranians. I also think context would matter on who I sympathize with because some soldiers are piece of shits while others it's tragic.
Oh yeah, good times XD. Was really expecting to Danilo instead of Fagner because he is much better defensively......... Oh well. Without Casemiro, having to stop Lukaku and Hazard on attack and the precise pass of De Bruyne. That will be a fun game.Fagner will never stop being a (sad) surprise
Remember when people defended his call up because "c'mon, he's the third option, he's never playing a single minute in the cup, stop bitching!"?
What the fuck kind of whatabouttery utter nonsense is this?So soldiers, with guns and fighter jets went in there without the intent to kill human beings? And they accidentally just happened to kill tens of thousands?
What makes the issue different here is something you're never going to acknowledge. Poachers are black and dirt poor africans, so the sympathy is simply not there. But those soldiers were primarily white, have largely the same values and lifestyle, you can relate, so there is sympathy.
Apart from the first half against Mexico, when Fagner was beaten everytime someone went at him, he's been solid on defense.Oh yeah, good times XD. Was really expecting to Danilo instead of Fagner because he is much better defensively......... Oh well. Without Casemiro, having to stop Lukaku and Hazard on attack and the precise pass of De Bruyne. That will be a fun game.
Who the fuck knows mate
Apart from the first half against Mexico, when Fagner was beaten everytime someone went at him, he's been solid on defense.
He's like 1.65m tho..
Poacher is also a type of striker, think Inzaghi, Van Nistelrooij etc. Not a lot of those around anymore.
Poacher is also a type of striker, think Inzaghi, Van Nistelrooij etc. Not a lot of those around anymore.
It's like you completely missed the fact I said context matters when it comes to these soldiers. I'm not saying all the soldiers are innocent but you're comparing poaching, something that is killing and causing the extinction of animals which in turn endagers humans as well(funny how you ignore the affect it has on humans?) to a war that had a lot of political issues and soldiers were forced to go there.So soldiers, with guns and fighter jets went in there without the intent to kill human beings? And they accidentally just happened to kill tens of thousands?
What makes the issue different here is something you're never going to acknowledge. Poachers are black and dirt poor africans, so the sympathy is simply not there. But those soldiers were primarily white, have largely the same values and lifestyle, you can relate, so there is sympathy.
The absolute best poacher of all time.
Already influencing the next generation of players, what a legend.
If we actually are deflecting this to goal poachers, isn't the goal poacher role effectively dead now?
Since strikers are expected to help out more etc