Yeah, pretty much. I'm very cynical when it comes to Square. They've disappointed me so much in the last 15 or so years that I have virtually nothing but negative thoughts about them. I'm always expecting them to let me down, and they always do.But... why? Like, Square makes some bad decisions, I'll give you that. But what is the reason we believe that this would be one? Why would they cut a fan favorite character from the roster of a remake of their most prestigious game?
The decision makes sense in the first one because of Red's place in the story. But it would make no sense for him to not be playable in future games.
I don't mean to accuse, but it sounds like cynicism for the sake of cynicism to believe that.
So yeah, don't worry about the accusation. It's completely, 100% right.
Like this:
That's like saying you expect Square to cut out Vincent because he wasn't in the first game. Literally no reason to think such unless you're just being negative for the sake of being negative.
And this:
why use resources for an already costly game for a character that is
A: only playable for a few hours at best
B: would not come close to having the same amount of things to do with as the others do
He'll be in future games. Come on now. Iirc he is even listed in playable, just isn't yet
And this!:
someone really said they don't think red 13 will be playable in the next game
the thinking of some people, yikes